Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 852

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Burden of Tricuspid Regurgitation in Patients Diagnosed in the Community Setting

Open access
Topilsky, Yan, Maltais, Simon, Medina Inojosa, Jose, Oguz, Didem, Michelena, Hector, Maalouf, Joseph, Mahoney, Douglas W., Enriquez-Sarano, Maurice·2019·JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging

Abstract

OBJECTIVES This study sought to analyze patients with tricuspid regurgitation (TR) diagnosed in the community setting (Olmsted County) by Doppler echocardiography to define the prevalence, characteristics, and implications of clinically significant (greater or equal to moderate) TR. BACKGROUND The prevalence, cause distribution, and significance of TR are mostly unknown. METHODS All adult residents of Olmsted County, Minnesota, who underwent clinically indicated Doppler echocardiography between 1990 and 2000 were evaluated for presence of greater or equal to moderate TR. The characteristics and outcome of TR carriers was then analyzed. RESULTS During the study period, 417 community residents were diagnosed with greater or equal to moderate TR corresponding to an U.S. age- and sex-adjusted prevalence of 0.55% with 95% confidence interval (0.50 to 0.60). TR adjusted prevalence was higher in women (p < 0.01) and strongly linked to age (p < 0.0001). Isolated TR (without significant comorbidities, structural left valve disease, pulmonary hypertension, or overt cardiac cause) represented 8.1% of patients with greater or equal to moderate TR. Isolated TR adjusted for age, sex, ejection fraction, atrial fibrillation, and Charlson comorbidity index independently predicted higher mortality (adjusted risk ratio: 1.68; 95% confidence interval: 1.04 to 2.60; p = 0.03) for qualitative definition. Mortality in patients with greater or equal to moderate isolated TR was higher than in the matched cases with trivial TR (p = 0.0014; matching for age, sex, atrial fibrillation, ejection fraction, comorbidity index). Only 2.6% of patients ever had tricuspid valve surgery during follow-up. CONCLUSIONS Clinically significant (greater or equal to moderate) TR is common in community residents diagnosed by Doppler echocardiography and increases with age. Isolated TR is associated with excess mortality, thus TR represents an important public health problem.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jcmg.2018.06.014

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 852

Metadata

Authors
Topilsky, Y., Maltais, S., Medina Inojosa, J., Oguz, D., Michelena, H., Maalouf, J., Mahoney, D. W., & Enriquez-Sarano, M.
Venue
JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-03
Volume
12
Issue
3
Pages
433-442
ISSN
  • 1876-7591 (ISSN-L)
  • 1936-878X
OpenAlex
W2885306372
Cited by
852
References
3
FWCI
32.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Burden of Tricuspid Regurgitation in Patients Diagnosed in the Community Setting. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jcmg.2018.06.014
The paper
Topilsky, Y., Maltais, S., Medina Inojosa, J., Oguz, D., Michelena, H., Maalouf, J., Mahoney, D. W., & Enriquez-Sarano, M. (2019). Burden of Tricuspid Regurgitation in Patients Diagnosed in the Community Setting. JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2018.06.014

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.