The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Multiple treatments with liposomal doxorubicin and ultrasound-induced disruption of blood–tumor and blood–brain barriers improve outcomes in a rat glioma model
Open accessAbstract
The blood-brain-barrier (BBB) prevents the transport of most anticancer agents to the central nervous system and restricts delivery to infiltrating brain tumors. The heterogeneous vascular permeability in tumor vessels, along with several other factors, creates additional barriers for drug treatment for brain tumors. Focused ultrasound (FUS), when combined with circulating microbubbles, is an emerging noninvasive method to temporarily permeabilize the BBB and the “blood-tumor barrier”. Here, we tested the impact of three weekly sessions of FUS and liposomal doxorubicin (DOX) in 9L rat glioma tumors. Animals that received FUS + DOX (N = 8) had a median survival time that was increased significantly (P < 0.001) compared to animals who received DOX only (N = 6), FUS only (N = 8), or no treatment (N = 7). Median survival for animals that received FUS + DOX was increased by 100% relative to untreated controls, whereas animals who received DOX alone had only a 16% improvement. Animals who received only FUS showed no improvement. No tumor cells were found in histology in 4/8 animals in the FUS + DOX group, and in two animals, only a few tumor cells were detected. Adverse events in the treatment group included skin toxicity, impaired activity, damage to surrounding brain tissue, and tissue loss at the tumor site. In one animal, intratumoral hemorrhage was observed. These events are largely consistent with known side effects of doxorubicin and with an extensive tumor burden. Overall this work demonstrates that multiple sessions using this FUS technique to enhance the delivery of liposomal doxorubicin has a pronounced therapeutic effect in this rat glioma model.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Progress and challenges towards targeted delivery of cancer therapeutics
Rosenblum, D., Joshi, N., Tao, W., Karp, J. M., & Peer, D. (2018) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-018-03705-y · Cited by 2,220
Nanomaterial-based blood-brain-barrier (BBB) crossing strategies
Xie, J., Shen, Z., Anraku, Y., Kataoka, K., & Chen, X. (2019) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.119491 · Cited by 604
Aryal, M., Arvanitis, C. D., Alexander, P. M., & McDannold, N. (2014) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2014.01.008 · Cited by 443
Self-citationProgress in brain targeting drug delivery system by nasal route
Khan, A. R., Liu, M., Khan, M. W., & Zhai, G. (2017) · Journal of Controlled Release · doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2017.09.001 · Cited by 402
Evolving Drug Delivery Strategies to Overcome the Blood Brain Barrier
S. Hersh, D., S. Wadajkar, A., B. Roberts, N., G. Perez, J., P. Connolly, N., Frenkel, V., A. Winkles, J., F. Woodworth, G., & J. Kim, A. (2016) · Current Pharmaceutical Design · doi:10.2174/1381612822666151221150733 · Cited by 387
Metadata
- Authors
- Aryal, M., Vykhodtseva, N., Zhang, Y.-Z., Park, J., & McDannold, N.
- Venue
- Journal of Controlled Release
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2013-07
- Volume
- 169
- Issue
- 1-2
- Pages
- 103-111
- ISSN
- 0168-3659 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1964956174
- Cited by
- 261
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Multiple treatments with liposomal doxorubicin and ultrasound-induced disruption of blood–tumor and blood–brain barriers improve outcomes in a rat glioma model. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jconrel.2013.04.007
- The paper
- Aryal, M., Vykhodtseva, N., Zhang, Y.-Z., Park, J., & McDannold, N. (2013). Multiple treatments with liposomal doxorubicin and ultrasound-induced disruption of blood–tumor and blood–brain barriers improve outcomes in a rat glioma model. Journal of Controlled Release. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2013.04.007
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.