Cited by 228Advanced Drug Delivery SystemsNanoparticle-Based Drug DeliveryInhalation and Respiratory Drug Delivery

Nanosystems in nose-to-brain drug delivery: A review of non-clinical brain targeting studies

Open access
Pires, Patrícia C., Santos, Adriana O.·2018·Journal of Controlled Release

Abstract

The treatment of neurodegenerative and psychiatric disorders remains a challenge in medical research. Several strategies have been developed over the years, either to overcome the blood-brain barrier or to achieve a safer or faster brain delivery, one of them being intranasal (IN) administration. The possibility of direct nose-to-brain transport offers enhanced targeting and reduced systemic side effects. Nevertheless, labile, low soluble, low permeant and/or less potent drugs might need a formulation other than the common solutions or suspensions. For that, the formulation of nanosystems is considered to be a promising approach, since it can protect drugs from chemical and/or metabolic degradation, enhance their solubility, or offer transport through biological membranes. However, the understanding of the factors promoting efficient brain targeting when using nanosystems through the nasal route is currently patchy and incomplete. The main purpose of the present review was to evaluate the association between brain delivery efficacy (in terms of brain targeting, brain bioavailability and time to reach the brain) and nanosystem type. For that, we performed a systematic bibliographic search and analysis. Furthermore, study designs, nanosystem properties, and reporting quality were also analyzed and discussed. It was found a high heterogeneity in how pre-clinical brain targeting studies have been conducted, analyzed and reported in scientific literature, which surely originates a significant degree of bias and data dispersion. This review attempts to provide some systematization recommendations, which may be useful for researchers entering the field, and assist in increasing the uniformity of future reports. The analysis of literature data confirmed that there is evidence of the advantage of the IN route (when compared to the intravenous route) and in using carrier nanosystems (when compared to IN solutions) for brain delivery of a large set of drugs. Among the most represented nanosystem classes, microemulsions had some of the lowest pharmacokinetic ratios values, while polymeric micelles had some of the best. Nevertheless, brain targeting efficacy comparisons between nanosystem groups had little statistical significance, and the superiority of the polymeric micelles group disappeared when nanosystems were compared to the respective IN drug solutions. In fact, some drugs reached the brain so efficiently, even as drug solutions, that further benefit from formulating them into nanosystems became less evident.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jconrel.2017.11.047

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Drugs can be directly administered through the IN route to the CNS via the olfactory mucosa.

    “Drugs can be directly administrated through the IN route to the CNS via the olfactory mucosa [249].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pires, P. C., & Santos, A. O.
Affiliations
University of Beira Interior (PT)
Corresponding author
Santos, Adriana O.
Venue
Journal of Controlled Release
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-01
Volume
270
Pages
89-100
ISSN
0168-3659 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2775238672
Cited by
228
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 36 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 38 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 8
FWCI
1.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Controlled Release (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • FEDER (POCI-01-0145-FEDER-007491)
  • National Foundation for Science and Technology (UID/Multi/00709/2013)
  • Centro2020 (CEBTRI-01-0145-FEDER-000013)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmaceutical Science › Advanced Drug Delivery Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Inhalation and Respiratory Drug Delivery
Keywords
nose-to-brain delivery, intranasal administration, nanosystems, brain targeting, blood-brain barrier, brain bioavailability, polymeric micelles, microemulsions, neurodegenerative diseases, mental illness, preclinical study design, reporting quality
MeSH terms
Administration, Intranasal, Animals, Biological Transport, Brain, Humans, Nasal Mucosa, Drug Delivery Systems, Nanostructures

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review