Cited by 90Algal biology and biofuel productionCarbon Dioxide Capture TechnologiesFluid Dynamics and Mixing

CO2 capturing by chlorella vulgaris in a bubble column photo-bioreactor; Effect of bubble size on CO2 removal and growth rate

Barahoei, Malihe, Hatamipour, Mohammad Sadegh, Afsharzadeh, Saeed·2020·Journal of CO2 Utilization

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jcou.2019.11.023

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Barahoei, M., Hatamipour, M. S., & Afsharzadeh, S.
Affiliations
University of Isfahan (IR)
Corresponding author
Hatamipour, Mohammad Sadegh
Venue
Journal of CO2 Utilization
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-04
Volume
37
Pages
9-19
ISSN
2212-9820 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2990172931
Cited by
90
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 9
FWCI
1.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of CO2 Utilization (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Algal biology and biofuel production
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Fluid Dynamics and Mixing
Keywords
CO2 capture, Chlorella vulgaris, bubble column photobioreactor, bubble size, microalgae cultivation, CO2 fixation rate, microalgae growth rate, humidified air, CO2 utilization efficiency, air flow rate, light intensity, response surface methodology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review