The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Dimensionality reduction and polynomial chaos acceleration of Bayesian inference in inverse problems
Open accessAbstract
We consider a Bayesian approach to nonlinear inverse problems in which the unknown quantity is a spatial or temporal field, endowed with a hierarchical Gaussian process prior. Computational challenges in this construction arise from the need for repeated evaluations of the forward model (e.g., in the context of Markov chain Monte Carlo) and are compounded by high dimensionality of the posterior. We address these challenges by introducing truncated Karhunen-Loeve expansions, based on the prior distribution, to efficiently parameterize the unknown field and to specify a stochastic forward problem whose solution captures that of the deterministic forward model over the support of the prior. We seek a solution of this problem using Galerkin projection on a polynomial chaos basis, and use the solution to construct a reduced-dimensionality surrogate posterior density that is inexpensive to evaluate. We demonstrate the formulation on a transient diffusion equation with prescribed source terms, inferring the spatially-varying diffusivity of the medium from limited and noisy data.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gelman, A., Carlin, J. B., Stern, H. S., & Rubin, D. B. (2003) · doi:10.1201/9780429258480 · Cited by 27,276
Gaussian Processes for Machine Learning
Rasmussen, C. E., & Williams, C. K. I. (2005) · doi:10.7551/mitpress/3206.001.0001 · Cited by 11,705
Inverse Problem Theory and Methods for Model Parameter Estimation
Tarantola, A. (2005) · doi:10.1137/1.9780898717921 · Cited by 6,585
Bayesian calibration of computer models
Kennedy, M. C., & O'Hagan, A. (2001) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/1467-9868.00294 · Cited by 4,222
Gelman, A. (2006) · Bayesian Analysis · doi:10.1214/06-ba117a · Cited by 4,050 · cited 1×
“Adopting a fully Bayesian approach, we let θ be a hyperparameter endowed with a conjugate inverse gamma hyperprior, θ ∼ IG(α, β) [53, 64, 65]:”
Method
Cited by
A Survey of Projection-Based Model Reduction Methods for Parametric Dynamical Systems
Benner, P., Gugercin, S., & Willcox, K. (2015) · SIAM Review · doi:10.1137/130932715 · Cited by 1,916
Simulation-based optimal bayesian experimental design for nonlinear systems
Huan, X., & Marzouk, Y. M. (2013) · Journal of Computational Physics · doi:10.1016/j.jcp.2012.08.013 · Cited by 438
“, [56, 57, 58]), and this is the approach we shall use.”
BackgroundMethodSelf-citationLaloy, E., Rogiers, B., Vrugt, J. A., Mallants, D., & Jacques, D. (2013) · Water Resources Research · doi:10.1002/wrcr.20226 · Cited by 264
Metadata
- Authors
- Marzouk, Y. M., & Najm, H. N.
- Venue
- Journal of Computational Physics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2009-04
- Volume
- 228
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1862-1902
- ISSN
- 0021-9991 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2074686342
- Cited by
- 418
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 8.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Dimensionality reduction and polynomial chaos acceleration of Bayesian inference in inverse problems. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jcp.2008.11.024
- The paper
- Marzouk, Y. M., & Najm, H. N. (2009). Dimensionality reduction and polynomial chaos acceleration of Bayesian inference in inverse problems. Journal of Computational Physics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2008.11.024
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.