The DOI matches its Crossref record; 85 of the 85 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Survey of Projection-Based Model Reduction Methods for Parametric Dynamical Systems
Open accessAbstract
Numerical simulation of large-scale dynamical systems plays a fundamental role in studying a wide range of complex physical phenomena; however, the inherent large-scale nature of the models often leads to unmanageable demands on computational resources. Model reduction aims to reduce this computational burden by generating reduced models that are faster and cheaper to simulate, yet accurately represent the original large-scale system behavior. Model reduction of linear, nonparametric dynamical systems has reached a considerable level of maturity, as reflected by several survey papers and books. However, parametric model reduction has emerged only more recently as an important and vibrant research area, with several recent advances making a survey paper timely. Thus, this paper aims to provide a resource that draws together recent contributions in different communities to survey the state of the art in parametric model reduction methods. Parametric model reduction targets the broad class of problems for which the equations governing the system behavior depend on a set of parameters. Examples include parameterized partial differential equations and large-scale systems of parameterized ordinary differential equations. The goal of parametric model reduction is to generate low-cost but accurate models that characterize system response for different values of the parameters. This paper surveys state-of-the-art methods in projection-based parametric model reduction, describing the different approaches within each class of methods for handling parametric variation and providing a comparative discussion that lends insights to potential advantages and disadvantages in applying each of the methods. We highlight the important role played by parametric model reduction in design, control, optimization, and uncertainty quantification---settings that require repeated model evaluations over different parameter values.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Golub, G. (2012) · doi:10.56021/9781421407944 · Cited by 34,505
Jolliffe, I. (2005) · Encyclopedia of Statistics in Behavioral Science · doi:10.1002/0470013192.bsa501 · Cited by 14,310
Analysis of a complex of statistical variables into principal components.
Hotelling, H. (1933) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0071325 · Cited by 9,633
Turbulence and the dynamics of coherent structures. I. Coherent structures
Sirovich, L. (1987) · Quarterly of Applied Mathematics · doi:10.1090/qam/910462 · Cited by 6,224
Loève, M. (1963) · Andalas University Repository (Andalas University) · Cited by 5,938
Stochastic Finite Elements: A Spectral Approach
Ghanem, R., & Spanos, P. D. (1991) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-3094-6 · Cited by 5,851
Principal component analysis in linear systems: Controllability, observability, and model reduction
Moore, B. (1981) · IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control · doi:10.1109/tac.1981.1102568 · Cited by 5,282
The Wiener--Askey Polynomial Chaos for Stochastic Differential Equations
Xiu, D., & Karniadakis, G. E. (2002) · SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing · doi:10.1137/s1064827501387826 · Cited by 4,807
Bayesian calibration of computer models
Kennedy, M. C., & O'Hagan, A. (2001) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/1467-9868.00294 · Cited by 4,222
Doyle, J. C. (2002) · IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC) · doi:10.1109/cdc.1996.572756 · Cited by 3,742
Cited by
Digital twin: values, challenges and enablers from a modeling perspective
Rasheed, A., San, O., & Kvamsdal, T. (2020) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2020.2970143 · Cited by 1,952
Sun, L., Gao, H., Pan, S., & Wang, J.-X. (2020) · Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.cma.2019.112732 · Cited by 1,045
Data-driven discovery of coordinates and governing equations
Champion, K., Lusch, B., Kutz, J. N., & Brunton, S. L. (2019) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1906995116 · Cited by 909
(2018) · IEEE Control Systems · doi:10.1109/mcs.2018.2810460 · Cited by 518
Digital twin, physics-based model, and machine learning applied to damage detection in structures
Ritto, T. G., & Rochinha, F. A. (2021) · Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing · doi:10.1016/j.ymssp.2021.107614 · Cited by 367
Metadata
- Authors
- Benner, P., Gugercin, S., & Willcox, K.
- Venue
- SIAM Review
- Published
- 2015-01
- Volume
- 57
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 483-531
- ISSN
- 0036-1445 (ISSN-L)
- 1095-7200
- OpenAlex
- W2152896489
- Cited by
- 1,916
- References
- 85
- FWCI
- 53.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Survey of Projection-Based Model Reduction Methods for Parametric Dynamical Systems. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1137/130932715
- The paper
- Benner, P., Gugercin, S., & Willcox, K. (2015). A Survey of Projection-Based Model Reduction Methods for Parametric Dynamical Systems. SIAM Review. https://doi.org/10.1137/130932715
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.