Cited by 201Computational Fluid Dynamics and AerodynamicsSolar and Space Plasma DynamicsNumerical Solvers for Ordinary Differential Equations

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The energy conserving particle-in-cell method

Open access
Markidis, Stefano, Lapenta, Giovanni·2011·Journal of Computational Physics

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jcp.2011.05.033

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Another set of works studied numerically ECR discharges with a grid extraction system using a simplified approach where the MW fields were calculated from Eqs. (10) and (11) but without taking into account the plasma contribution, i.e., with j = 0.

    “Another set of works 26,116,156-160 studied numerically ECR discharges with a grid extraction system. They used the aforementioned simplified approach, where the MW fields were calculated from Eqs. (10) and (11), but without taking into account the plasma contribution, i.e., with j = 0.”

    From Plasma propulsion modeling with particle-based algorithms (2023) · cites this paper as [157]

    The Algorithm (p. 4) describes an energy-conserving particle-in-cell method and calculates current density from particles; it does not describe ECR discharges, a grid extraction system, or microwave fields calculated with j = 0. Searches for those terms found no passage addressing the attributed approach. (LLM, conf=0.77)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Ref. 157 observed an azimuthally rotating instability in the discharge chamber, which breaks the azimuthal symmetry and produces an azimuthal electric field, causing an enhanced axial transport of electrons due to the E × B electron drift.

    “In Ref. 157, an azimuthally rotating instability in the discharge chamber was observed, which breaks the azimuthal symmetry and produces an azimuthal electric field, causing an enhanced axial transport of electrons due to the E × B electron drift with B the magnetic field with a finite radial component.”

    From Plasma propulsion modeling with particle-based algorithms (2023) · cites this paper as [157]

    Sections 7.2 and 7.3 (p. 20) discuss simulated two-stream and Weibel instabilities, not an observed rotating instability in a discharge chamber. Searches for an azimuthal electric field and enhanced axial electron transport by E × B drift found no passage addressing the claim in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 17

  1. Lewis, 1970, Energy-conserving numerical approximations for Vlasov plasmas, Journal of Computational Physics, 6, 136, 10.1016/0021-9991(70)90012-4 · DOI
  2. Langdon, 1973, ‘Energy-conserving’ plasma simulation algorithms, Journal of Computational Physics, 12, 247, 10.1016/S0021-9991(73)80014-2 · DOI
  3. Knoll, 2004, Jacobian-free Newton–Krylov methods: a survey of approaches and applications, Journal of Computational Physics, 193, 357, 10.1016/j.jcp.2003.08.010 · DOI
  4. Langdon, 1979, Analysis of the time integration in plasma simulation, Journal of Computational Physics, 30, 202, 10.1016/0021-9991(79)90099-8 · DOI
  5. S. Markidis, Development of implicit kinetic simulation methods, and their application to ion beam propagation in current and future neutralized drift compression experiments, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2010.
  6. Dawson, 1983, Particle simulation of plasmas, Reviews of Modern Physics, 55, 403, 10.1103/RevModPhys.55.403 · DOI
  7. Hyman, 1999, Mimetic discretizations for Maxwell’s equations, Journal of Computational Physics, 151, 881, 10.1006/jcph.1999.6225 · DOI
  8. Yee, 1966, Numerical solution of initial boundary value problems involving Maxwell’s equations in isotropic media, IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, 14, 302, 10.1109/TAP.1966.1138693 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Marder, 1987, A method for incorporating Gauss’ law into electromagnetic PIC codes, Journal of Computational Physics, 68, 48, 10.1016/0021-9991(87)90043-X · DOI
  10. Langdon, 1992, On enforcing Gauss’ law in electromagnetic particle-in-cell codes, Computer Physics Communications, 70, 447, 10.1016/0010-4655(92)90105-8 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Lindman, 1970, Dispersion relation for computer-simulated plasmas, Journal of Computational Physics, 5, 13, 10.1016/0021-9991(70)90049-5 · DOI
  12. Weibel, 1959, Spontaneously growing transverse waves in a plasma due to an anisotropic velocity distribution, Physical Review Letters, 2, 83, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.2.83 · DOI
  13. Arakawa, 1990, Energy conserving and potential-enstrophy dissipating schemes for the shallow water equations, Monthly Weather Review, 118, 1960, 10.1175/1520-0493(1990)118<1960:ECAPED>2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  14. C. Kelley, Matlab codes from iterative methods for linear and nonlinear equations, 2010. <http://www.siam.org/books/kelley/fr16/matlabcode.php> (August 2010).
  15. Morse, 1971, Numerical simulation of the Weibel instability in one and two dimensions, Physics of Fluids, 14, 830, 10.1063/1.1693518 · DOI
  16. Langdon, 1972, Some electromagnetic plasma simulation methods and their noise properties, Physics of Fluids, 15, 1149, 10.1063/1.1694042 · DOI
  17. W.T. Taitano, Development of a Jacobian-free-Newton–Krylov method with kinetic enslavement to implicitly solve Vlasov–Poisson system in plasma physics, Masters Thesis, Nuclear Engineering, University of Idaho, 2010.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Markidis, S., & Lapenta, G.
Affiliations
KU Leuven (BE)
Corresponding author
Markidis, Stefano
Venue
Journal of Computational Physics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-08
Volume
230
Issue
18
Pages
7037-7052
ISSN
0021-9991 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2079467040
Cited by
201
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 4
FWCI
9.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Computational Physics (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › Computational Fluid Dynamics and Aerodynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Solar and Space Plasma Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Numerical Analysis › Numerical Solvers for Ordinary Differential Equations
Keywords
energy conservation (physics), implicit midpoint rule, two-stream instability, Weibel instability, grid instability, plasma simulation, electromagnetic field equations

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review