Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,210

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

NSFnets (Navier-Stokes flow nets): Physics-informed neural networks for the incompressible Navier-Stokes equations

Open access
Jin, Xiaowei, Cai, Shengze, Li, Hui, Karniadakis, George Em·2021·Journal of Computational Physics

Abstract

We employ physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) to simulate the incompressible flows ranging from laminar to turbulent flows. We perform PINN simulations by considering two different formulations of the Navier-Stokes equations: the velocity-pressure (VP) formulation and the vorticity-velocity (VV) formulation. We refer to these specific PINNs for the Navier-Stokes flow nets as NSFnets. Analytical solutions and direct numerical simulation (DNS) databases provide proper initial and boundary conditions for the NSFnet simulations. The spatial and temporal coordinates are the inputs of the NSFnets, while the instantaneous velocity and pressure fields are the outputs for the VP-NSFnet, and the instantaneous velocity and vorticity fields are the outputs for the VV-NSFnet. These two different forms of the Navier-Stokes equations together with the initial and boundary conditions are embedded into the loss function of the PINNs. No data is provided for the pressure to the VP-NSFnet, which is a hidden state and is obtained via the incompressibility constraint without splitting the equations. We obtain good accuracy of the NSFnet simulation results upon convergence of the loss function, verifying that NSFnets can effectively simulate complex incompressible flows using either the VP or the VV formulations. We also perform a systematic study on the weights used in the loss function for the data/physics components and investigate a new way of computing the weights dynamically to accelerate training and enhance accuracy. Our results suggest that the accuracy of NSFnets, for both laminar and turbulent flows, can be improved with proper tuning of weights (manual or dynamic) in the loss function.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jcp.2020.109951

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Cited by

See all 1,210

Metadata

Authors
Jin, X., Cai, S., Li, H., & Karniadakis, G. E.
Venue
Journal of Computational Physics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-02
Volume
426
Pages
109951
ISSN
0021-9991 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3010839048
Cited by
1,210
References
5
FWCI
44.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: NSFnets (Navier-Stokes flow nets): Physics-informed neural networks for the incompressible Navier-Stokes equations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jcp.2020.109951
The paper
Jin, X., Cai, S., Li, H., & Karniadakis, G. E. (2021). NSFnets (Navier-Stokes flow nets): Physics-informed neural networks for the incompressible Navier-Stokes equations. Journal of Computational Physics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2020.109951

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.