The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Why have breast cancer mortality rates declined?
Open accessAbstract
The recent decline in breast cancer mortality in the USA might be due to prevention or to screening mammography or to improved treatment protocols. We sought to determine which factors are likely to be responsible for the observed decline in breast cancer mortality. We used the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database to estimate incidence rates, mortality rates, and survival from breast cancer for white women who were diagnosed with invasive breast cancer from 1975 to 2011. From 1975 to 2010, the mortality of breast cancer declined from 32 per 100,000 per year to 21 per 100,000 per year (34%). At the same time, the incidence increased by 30%, in particular for localized breast cancers (62%) without a commensurate decline in the number of regional breast cancers. From 1975 to 2002, 10-year survival increased by 28% (from 64.9% to 82.8%). The increase in survival was greater for regional cancers (23%), than for localized (10%) or for distant cancers (3%). The decline in breast cancer mortality in the USA from 1975 to 2010 is unlikely to be the result of advances in prevention or screening. The large increase in the incidence of localized cancers without a corresponding decrease in advanced breast cancers suggests a prominent stage shift, due to overdiagnosis. The drop in the mortality rate could be accounted for by an improvement in cancer survival, likely due to increased use of adjuvant chemotherapy over the period.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Writing Group for the Women's Health Initiative Investigators (2002) · JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association · doi:10.1001/jama.288.3.321 · Cited by 15,889
Trastuzumab after Adjuvant Chemotherapy in HER2-Positive Breast Cancer
Piccart-Gebhart, M. J., Procter, M., Leyland-Jones, B., Goldhirsch, A., Untch, M., Smith, I., Gianni, L., Baselga, J., Bell, R., Jackisch, C., et al. (2005) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa052306 · Cited by 5,084
Cited by
Key steps for effective breast cancer prevention
Britt, K. L., Cuzick, J., & Phillips, K.-A. (2020) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/s41568-020-0266-x · Cited by 992
Breast-Cancer Tumor Size, Overdiagnosis, and Mammography Screening Effectiveness
Welch, H. G., Prorok, P. C., O’Malley, A. J., & Kramer, B. S. (2016) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1600249 · Cited by 699
Tumor-derived exosomes in the regulation of macrophage polarization
Baig, M. S., Roy, A., Rajpoot, S., Liu, D., Savai, R., Banerjee, S., Kawada, M., Faisal, S. M., Saluja, R., Saqib, U., et al. (2020) · Inflammation Research · doi:10.1007/s00011-020-01318-0 · Cited by 267
Mital, S., & Nguyen, H. V. (2022) · BMC Cancer · doi:10.1186/s12885-022-09613-1 · Cited by 38
Phenylpropanoids, eugenol scaffold, and its derivatives as anticancer
Fadilah, F., Yanuar, A., Arsianti, A., & Andrajati, R. (2017) · Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical and Clinical Research · doi:10.22159/ajpcr.2017.v10i3.16071 · Cited by 28
Metadata
- Authors
- Narod, S. A., Iqbal, J., & Miller, A. B.
- Venue
- Journal of Cancer Policy
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-09
- Volume
- 5
- Pages
- 8-17
- ISSN
- 2213-5383 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1852752264
- Cited by
- 192
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 4.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Why have breast cancer mortality rates declined? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jcpo.2015.03.002
- The paper
- Narod, S. A., Iqbal, J., & Miller, A. B. (2015). Why have breast cancer mortality rates declined? Journal of Cancer Policy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcpo.2015.03.002
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.