Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 433

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Journal of Consumer Psychology: The Official Journal of The Society for Consumer Psychology

Maheswaran, Durairaj·2009·Journal of Consumer Psychology

Abstract

This is the last issue featuring articles accepted by the editorial team under the editorship of Durairaj Maheswaran. During the tenure of this editorial team (2005–2008), the team has published 12 Research Dialogues and around 70 articles. The Research Dialogue section, which was originally scheduled to appear in every alternate issue, grew dramatically under the guidance and initiative of Norbert Schwarz and became a regular feature. The Research Dialogue section started with a discussion on “The Horizontal/Vertical Distinction in Cross-Cultural Consumer Research” (Shavitt, Lalwani, Zhang & Torelli, 2006; Shavitt, Zhang, Torelli, Lalwani, 2006) and culminates in this issue with a discussion on Self and Identity (Oyserman 2009a, 2009b). The Research Dialogue section was able to fulfill its primary mission of featuring research topics from Psychology that were novel to consumer behavior, but highly relevant to the research in this domain: Self regulation (Bauemeister, 2008; Baumeister, Sparks, Stillman, & Vohs, 2008), Regret regulation (Inman, 2007; Pieters & Zeelenberg, 2007; Zeelenberg & Pieters, 2007), Cognitive appraisal (Han, Lerner & Keltner, 2007; Lerner, Han & Keltner, 2007), and Self-image motives (Dunning, 2007a, 2007b). Many researchers from the field of Psychology enthusiastically contributed their views on emerging research topics (Gollwitzer & Oettingen, 2008; Liberman, Trope & Wakslak, 2007; Trope, Liberman & Wakslak, 2007). Interestingly, as the relevance and contribution of the Research Dialogue section came to be recognized in the field, several consumer related researchers have come forward to present their ideas on topics that are unique to the consumer in the applied settings: “Question – Behavior Effect” explored the consequences of asking questions on subsequent behavior in a public health context (Fitzsimons & Moore, 2008; Sherman, 2008; Spangenberg, Greenwald & Sprott, 2008). Most important, some of the Research Dialogues such as CLT were able to stimulate follow up research in their domains (Kim & John, 2008). The enormous contribution of Norbert Schwarz to the field in consistently presenting a wide variety of topics and bringing various well-known scholars together is gratefully acknowledged. The research articles featured during this period covered a large array of topics that represented several research domains in social psychology and consumer behavior. The primary focus of most research that appeared was on demonstrating substantive phenomenon of theoretical interest such as meta-cognition (Rucker, Petty & Brinol, 2008), Implicit theories (Hung & Wyer, 2008), and analytic versus holistic thinking (Monga & John, 2008). Also, several articles examined normatively ambiguous behavior such as buying embarrassing products or engaging in embarrassing behavior (Lau-Gesk & Drolet, 2008), and gratuitous sex appeals (Sengupta & Dahl, 2008). In addition, emerging research that extends consumer behavior principles in to new contexts such as art (Hagtvedt & Patrick, 2008) also figured in the portfolio of published articles. Apart from substantive research, several articles that addressed methodological issues such as scale development (Dimofte & Yalch, 2007) and analytical procedures (Iacobucci, Saldanha, & Deng, 2007) were also published. Finally, mention must be made of two articles that addressed very unique social issues such as poverty (Charkravarti, 2006) and illiteracy (Viswanathan, Torelli, Xia & Gau, 2009). One of my objectives at the Journal of Consumer Psychology was to work with young scholars, especially during the early stages of their career and help them develop a viable and rigorous stream of research. The editorial team has worked with several doctoral students and their advisors to help them publish their work in the journal. The young scholars represent the cutting edge of knowledge development and the Journal of Consumer Psychology was proud to participate in the process of emerging and potentially impactful research. Three of these articles were selected for the JCP Young Contributor award (Shen & Wyer, 2008; Kramer & Song-Oh, 2007; Yoon, Gurhan-Canli & Schwarz, 2006). I wish the new editorial team headed by C.W. Park great success in furthering the mission of the Journal of Consumer Psychology and continuing to advance our understanding of Consumer Behavior.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jcps.2009.06.003

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 433

Metadata

Authors
Maheswaran, D.
Venue
Journal of Consumer Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-07
Volume
19
Issue
3
Pages
247-248
ISSN
  • 1057-7408 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-7663
OpenAlex
W2065145736
Cited by
433
References
4
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Journal of Consumer Psychology: The Official Journal of The Society for Consumer Psychology. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jcps.2009.06.003
The paper
Maheswaran, D. (2009). Journal of Consumer Psychology: The Official Journal of The Society for Consumer Psychology. Journal of Consumer Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2009.06.003

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.