Predictors of the complication of postintubation hypotension during emergency airway management
Abstract
Objective Arterial hypotension is a recognized complication of emergency intubation that is independently associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Our aim was to identify factors associated with postintubation hypotension after emergency intubation. Methods Retrospective cohort study of tracheal intubations performed in a large, urban emergency department over a 1-year period. Patients were included if they were older than 17 years and had no systolic blood pressure measurements below 90 mm Hg for 30 consecutive minutes before intubation. Patients were analyzed in 2 groups, those with postintubation hypotension (PIH), defined as any recorded systolic blood pressure less than 90 mm Hg within 60 minutes of intubation, and those with no PIH. Multiple logistic regression modeling was used to define predictors of PIH. Results A total 465 patients underwent emergency intubation during the study period, and 300 met inclusion criteria for this study. Postintubation hypotension occurred in 66 (22%) of 300 patients, and these patients experienced significantly higher in-hospital mortality (35% vs 20%; odds ratio [OR] 2.1; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.2-3.9). Multiple logistic regression analysis demonstrated that preintubation shock index (SI), chronic renal disease, intubation for acute respiratory failure, and age were independently associated with PIH. Of these, SI was the most strongly associated factor (OR, 55; 95% CI, 13-232). Receiver operating characteristic plot s…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The incidence of peri-intubation desaturation, hypocapnea, and hypotension in emergency intubations is relatively high.
“Given the relatively high incidence of peri-intubation desaturation, hypocapnea, and hypotension in emergency intubations”
From Airway Management in Trauma (2018) · cites this paper as [26]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Kovacs, G., & Sowers, N. (2018) · Emergency Medicine Clinics of North America · doi:10.1016/j.emc.2017.08.006 · Cited by 115 · see citing works
- Authors
- Heffner, A. C., Swords, D. S., Nussbaum, M. L., Kline, J. A., & Jones, A. E.
- Affiliations
- Carolinas Medical Center (US)
- Carolinas Healthcare System (US)
- Corresponding author
- Heffner, Alan C.
- Venue
- Journal of Critical Care
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2012-12
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 587-593
- ISSN
- 0883-9441 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2013124743
- Cited by
- 156
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 4
- FWCI
- 8.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Critical Care (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Airway Management and Intubation Techniques
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy
- Keywords
- emergency intubation, emergency airway management, shock index, rapid sequence intubation, neuromuscular blockade, chronic kidney disease, acute respiratory failure, in-hospital mortality, risk prediction
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Age Factors, Aged, Blood Pressure, Emergency Service, Hospital, Female, Humans, Hypotension, Intubation, Intratracheal, Male, Middle Aged, Postoperative Complications, Retrospective Studies, ROC Curve, Time Factors, Comorbidity, Incidence, Logistic Models, Hospital Mortality, Risk Assessment
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review