Cited by 76Selenium in Biological SystemsClinical Nutrition and GastroenterologySepsis Diagnosis and Treatment

Selenium supplementation in critically ill patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Landucci, Francesco, Mancinelli, Paola, De Gaudio, A. Raffaele, Virgili, Gianni·2014·Journal of Critical Care

Abstract

Purpose The oxidative stress is recognized as a constant feature in critical illness. Nevertheless, the use of antioxidant therapy remains controversial. We tried to demonstrate that intravenous selenium supplementation could promote antioxidant status and help protect against infection and organ failure, improving outcome in critically ill patients. Materials and methods We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the exogenous supplementation of selenium versus standard therapy without any adjuvant in critically ill adults. Results Nine RCTs met inclusion criteria. Selenium supplementation was associated with a reduction in 28-day mortality of borderline statistical significance (risk ratio = 0.84, 95% confidence interval 0.71-0.99, P = .04). The analysis of pre-defined subgroups detected no significant effects regarding the supplementation with doses of selenium ≤ 500 μg/d, administration of a load dose with a bolus and duration of treatment. Only 2 studies analyzed 6-month mortality and could not show a difference. No effects could be demonstrated on hospital length of stay, pulmonary infections, or renal failure. Conclusions The use of high-dose selenium might be associated with a beneficial effect on 28-day mortality in critically ill patients. Nevertheless, the use of selenium as adjuvant therapy needs further evaluations.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jcrc.2013.08.017

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Three meta-analyses showed a beneficial effect of selenium supplementation on mortality in septic patients.

    “Three meta-analyses showed a beneficial effect of selenium supplementation on mortality in septic patients [72,73,74].”

    From Nutrition in Sepsis: A Bench-to-Bedside Review. (2020) · cites this paper as [73]

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 36 · Cited by 76

Authors
Landucci, F., Mancinelli, P., De Gaudio, A. R., & Virgili, G.
Affiliations
University of Florence (IT)
Venue
Journal of Critical Care
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-02
Volume
29
Issue
1
Pages
150-156
ISSN
0883-9441 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1998568899
Cited by
76
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 1
FWCI
1.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Critical Care (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Florence Research (University of Florence) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Selenium in Biological Systems
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
Keywords
selenium supplementation, critically ill patients, oxidative stress, antioxidant therapy, 28-day mortality, organ failure, infection, adjuvant therapy
MeSH terms
Antioxidants, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Humans, Selenium, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Critical Illness, Oxidative Stress, Dietary Supplements

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review