Cited by 55Airway Management and Intubation TechniquesHemodynamic Monitoring and TherapySepsis Diagnosis and Treatment

Evaluation of preintubation shock index and modified shock index as predictors of postintubation hypotension and other short-term outcomes

Trivedi, Sangita, Demirci, Onur, Arteaga, Grace, Kashyap, Rahul, Smischney, Nathan J.·2015·Journal of Critical Care

Abstract

Purpose Preintubation shock index (SI) and modified shock index (MSI) have demonstrated predictive capability for postintubation hypotension in emergency department. The primary aim was to explore this relationship in the critical care environment. The secondary aims were to evaluate the relationship of shock indices with other short-term outcomes like mortality and length of stay in intensive care unit. Materials and methods This is a nonconcurrent cohort study, conducted in eligible 140 adult intensive care unit (ICU) patients of a tertiary care medical center. Eligibility criterion was emergent endotracheal intubation in apparently hemodynamically stable patients. Results Preintubation SI ≥ 0.90 had a significant association with postintubation hypotension as defined by systolic blood pressure Conclusions Our findings indicate that preintubation SI greater than or equal to 0.90 is a predictor of postintubation hypotension (systolic blood pressure <90 mm Hg) and ICU mortality in emergently intubated adult patients in intensive care units.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jcrc.2015.04.013

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Patients with a shock index greater than 0.8 are at particular risk of developing significant hypotension in the postintubation period.

    “Patients with a shock index (defined as heart rate divided by SBP) of greater than 0.8 are at particular risk of developing significant hypotension in the postintubation period.82,95,96”

    From Airway Management in Trauma (2018) · cites this paper as [95]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Trivedi, S., Demirci, O., Arteaga, G., Kashyap, R., & Smischney, N. J.
Affiliations
Mayo Clinic (US)
Corresponding author
Trivedi, Sangita
Venue
Journal of Critical Care
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-08
Volume
30
Issue
4
Pages
861.e1-861.e7
ISSN
0883-9441 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1975011372
Cited by
55
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 1
FWCI
5.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Update notices
erratum (2015-10-01)
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Critical Care (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Airway Management and Intubation Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
Keywords
shock index, modified shock index, endotracheal intubation, ICU mortality, ICU length of stay, critically ill adults
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Blood Pressure, Critical Care, Emergency Service, Hospital, Female, Humans, Hypotension, Intensive Care Units, Intubation, Intratracheal, Male, Middle Aged, Postoperative Complications, Respiration, Artificial, Retrospective Studies, Severity of Illness Index, Shock, Cohort Studies, Multivariate Analysis, Hospital Mortality

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review