Evaluation of preintubation shock index and modified shock index as predictors of postintubation hypotension and other short-term outcomes
Abstract
Purpose Preintubation shock index (SI) and modified shock index (MSI) have demonstrated predictive capability for postintubation hypotension in emergency department. The primary aim was to explore this relationship in the critical care environment. The secondary aims were to evaluate the relationship of shock indices with other short-term outcomes like mortality and length of stay in intensive care unit. Materials and methods This is a nonconcurrent cohort study, conducted in eligible 140 adult intensive care unit (ICU) patients of a tertiary care medical center. Eligibility criterion was emergent endotracheal intubation in apparently hemodynamically stable patients. Results Preintubation SI ≥ 0.90 had a significant association with postintubation hypotension as defined by systolic blood pressure Conclusions Our findings indicate that preintubation SI greater than or equal to 0.90 is a predictor of postintubation hypotension (systolic blood pressure <90 mm Hg) and ICU mortality in emergently intubated adult patients in intensive care units.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Patients with a shock index greater than 0.8 are at particular risk of developing significant hypotension in the postintubation period.
“Patients with a shock index (defined as heart rate divided by SBP) of greater than 0.8 are at particular risk of developing significant hypotension in the postintubation period.82,95,96”
From Airway Management in Trauma (2018) · cites this paper as [95]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Kovacs, G., & Sowers, N. (2018) · Emergency Medicine Clinics of North America · doi:10.1016/j.emc.2017.08.006 · Cited by 115 · see citing works
- Authors
- Trivedi, S., Demirci, O., Arteaga, G., Kashyap, R., & Smischney, N. J.
- Affiliations
- Mayo Clinic (US)
- Corresponding author
- Trivedi, Sangita
- Venue
- Journal of Critical Care
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-08
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 861.e1-861.e7
- ISSN
- 0883-9441 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1975011372
- Cited by
- 55
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 5.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Update notices
- erratum (2015-10-01)
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Critical Care (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Airway Management and Intubation Techniques
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
- Keywords
- shock index, modified shock index, endotracheal intubation, ICU mortality, ICU length of stay, critically ill adults
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Blood Pressure, Critical Care, Emergency Service, Hospital, Female, Humans, Hypotension, Intensive Care Units, Intubation, Intratracheal, Male, Middle Aged, Postoperative Complications, Respiration, Artificial, Retrospective Studies, Severity of Illness Index, Shock, Cohort Studies, Multivariate Analysis, Hospital Mortality
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review