Cited by 82Crystallization and Solubility StudiesCalcium Carbonate Crystallization and InhibitionOrigins and Evolution of Life

Experimental evidence of chiral symmetry breaking in crystallization from primary nucleation

Open access
Viedma, Cristobal·2004·Journal of Crystal Growth

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2003.09.031

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 8 · Cited by 82

Authors
Viedma, C.
Venue
Journal of Crystal Growth
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2004-01
Volume
261
Issue
1
Pages
118-121
ISSN
0022-0248 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2062346927
Cited by
82
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 4
FWCI
1.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Crystal Growth (publishedVersion)
  • Library Open Repository (Universidad Complutense Madrid) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Crystallization and Solubility Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Calcium Carbonate Crystallization and Inhibition
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Origins and Evolution of Life
Keywords
chiral symmetry breaking, primary nucleation, sodium chlorate, instantaneous nucleation, crystal growth mechanism

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review