Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,002

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Detection and diagnosis of dental caries using a deep learning-based convolutional neural network algorithm

Open access
Lee, Jae-Hong, Kim, Do-Hyung, Jeong, Seong-Nyum, Choi, Seong-Ho·2018·Journal of Dentistry

Abstract

OBJECTIVES Deep convolutional neural networks (CNNs) are a rapidly emerging new area of medical research, and have yielded impressive results in diagnosis and prediction in the fields of radiology and pathology. The aim of the current study was to evaluate the efficacy of deep CNN algorithms for detection and diagnosis of dental caries on periapical radiographs. MATERIALS AND METHODS A total of 3000 periapical radiographic images were divided into a training and validation dataset (n = 2400 [80%]) and a test dataset (n = 600 [20%]). A pre-trained GoogLeNet Inception v3 CNN network was used for preprocessing and transfer learning. The diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, and area under the curve (AUC) were calculated for detection and diagnostic performance of the deep CNN algorithm. RESULTS The diagnostic accuracies of premolar, molar, and both premolar and molar models were 89.0% (80.4-93.3), 88.0% (79.2-93.1), and 82.0% (75.5-87.1), respectively. The deep CNN algorithm achieved an AUC of 0.917 (95% CI 0.860-0.975) on premolar, an AUC of 0.890 (95% CI 0.819-0.961) on molar, and an AUC of 0.845 (95% CI 0.790-0.901) on both premolar and molar models. The premolar model provided the best AUC, which was significantly greater than those for other models (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS This study highlighted the potential utility of deep CNN architecture for the detection and diagnosis of dental caries. A deep CNN algorithm provided considerably good performance in detecting dental caries in periapical radiographs. CLINICAL SIGNIfiCANCE: Deep CNN algorithms are expected to be among the most effective and efficient methods for diagnosing dental caries.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jdent.2018.07.015

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Cited by

See all 1,002

Metadata

Authors
Lee, J.-H., Kim, D.-H., Jeong, S.-N., & Choi, S.-H.
Venue
Journal of Dentistry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-10
Volume
77
Pages
106-111
ISSN
0300-5712 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2883741661
Cited by
1,002
References
5
FWCI
56.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Detection and diagnosis of dental caries using a deep learning-based convolutional neural network algorithm. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jdent.2018.07.015
The paper
Lee, J.-H., Kim, D.-H., Jeong, S.-N., & Choi, S.-H. (2018). Detection and diagnosis of dental caries using a deep learning-based convolutional neural network algorithm. Journal of Dentistry. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2018.07.015

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.