Cited by 29Skin Protection and AgingFacial Rejuvenation and Surgery TechniquesDermatology and Skin Diseases

Characterization of comprehensive appearances of skin ageing: An 11-year longitudinal study on facial skin ageing in Japanese females at Akita

Miyamoto, Kukizo, Inoue, Yasuko, Hsueh, Kesyin, Liang, Zhiwu, Yan, Xianghong, Yoshii, Takashi, Furue, Masutaka·2011·Journal of Dermatological Science

Abstract

Background Facial appearance is regarded as a typical index of ageing. However, people of the same age do not necessarily show the same degree of the facial appearance. The ageing of facial skin proceeds relatively slowly and therefore requires long-term follow-up to elucidate the mechanism of ageing changes. Objectives The purpose of this study was to identify facial skin parameters contributing the subjective impression of the overall ageing and characterize the degree of skin ageing by a 11 year longitudinal skin monitoring. Methods One-hundred-eight healthy Japanese females excluded outside workers aged 5-64 at 1999, and lived in Akita, Japan till 2010 were enrolled. Facial images were collected to quantify various skin optical parameters. Skin colour, hydration and barrier function were measured with Chromameter, Corneometer and TEWAmeter, respectively. The visual evaluation of the overall facial skin ageing impression was also carried out. The skin parameters contributing visible impression of skin ageing were identified by variable importance in projection analysis, and the degree of facial skin ageing over 11 years was statistically classified by a cluster analysis. Results Facial skin parameters that comprehensively influenced visible skin ageing, including hyperpigmented spots, wrinkles and texture were studied. The Skin Ageing Score calculated from these three skin factors was used to classify the subjects into a mild, age-appropriate, and severe skin ageing group.…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jdermsci.2011.09.009

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Miyamoto, K., Inoue, Y., Hsueh, K., Liang, Z., Yan, X., Yoshii, T., & Furue, M.
Affiliations
Kyushu University (JP)
Venue
Journal of Dermatological Science
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-12
Volume
64
Issue
3
Pages
229-236
ISSN
0923-1811 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2021952544
Cited by
29
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
0.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Dermatological Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Skin Protection and Aging
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Facial Rejuvenation and Surgery Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Dermatology and Skin Diseases
Keywords
skin hydration, skin barrier function, hyperpigmentation, wrinkles, skin texture, Japanese women
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Age Factors, Aged, Analysis of Variance, Child, Child, Preschool, Face, Female, Humans, Japan, Longitudinal Studies, Middle Aged, Permeability, Sex Factors, Skin Pigmentation, Water Loss, Insensible, Skin Aging, Cluster Analysis, Least-Squares Analysis, Asian People, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review