Cited by 12Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic ControlDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and LipoproteinsDiabetes Management and Research

Cardiovascular autonomic function and vibration perception threshold in type 2 diabetes mellitus

Goit, Rajesh Kumar, Khadka, Rita, Sharma, Sanjib Kumar, Limbu, Nirmala, Paudel, Bishnu Hari·2012·Journal of Diabetes and its Complications

Abstract

Objective The aim of this study was to compare cardiovascular autonomic function tests (AFT) and vibration perception threshold (VPT) of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) with controls.Research design/methods The study was conducted on 60 diabetic patients comparing with 30 controls. The cardiovascular AFT and VPT were assessed in both groups.Results Among cardiovascular AFT, E:I ratio [1.24 (1.2-1.32) vs 1.3 (1.24-1.4), p=0.001], and Valsalva ratio [1.28 (1.22-1.4) vs 1.6 (1.5-1.73), p=0.001], the indicators of parasympathetic reactivity were reduced in T2DM. Rise in DBP during handgrip, an indicator of sympathetic reactivity was lower in T2DM [12 (10-14) vs 16 (14-18) mmHg, p=0.001] whereas, fall in SBP during head up tilt [4 (4-8) vs 5 (4-8) mmHg] was comparable. VPT (somatic sensation) was comparable between T2DM and control.Conclusion Autonomic involvement is more marked than somatic, and parasympathetic involvement is more marked than the sympathetic, possibly reflecting severity and chronological pattern of their involvement.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2012.03.026

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The metaregression finding that time from diagnosis of T2DM was linked with higher SDNN is not contradictory to the decreased SDNN in T2DM but may simply highlight that cardiac parasympathetic activity in T2DM is affected before sympathetic activity.

    “Despite we demonstrated a decreased SDNN in T2DM patients, the metaregression is not contradictory but may simply highlights the fact that cardiac parasympathetic activity in T2DM is affected before sympathetic activity [80].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Goit, R. K., Khadka, R., Sharma, S. K., Limbu, N., & Paudel, B. H.
Affiliations
B.P. Koirala Institute of Health Sciences (NP)
Corresponding author
Goit, Rajesh Kumar
Venue
Journal of Diabetes and its Complications
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-07
Volume
26
Issue
4
Pages
339-342
ISSN
  • 0891-6632 (ISSN-L)
  • 1056-8727
OpenAlex
W2109852524
Cited by
12
References
18
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1
FWCI
0.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Diabetes and its Complications (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
Keywords
type 2 diabetes, cardiac autonomic dysfunction, vibration perception threshold, parasympathetic reactivity, sympathetic response, heart rate variability, E/I ratio, Valsalva ratio, somatic sensation
MeSH terms
Adult, Autonomic Nervous System, Blood Pressure, Cardiovascular System, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Sensory Thresholds, Sympathetic Nervous System, Vibration, Case-Control Studies, Tilt-Table Test, Hand Strength, Touch Perception, Respiratory Rate

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review