Cited by 87Diabetes Management and ResearchDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchDiabetes Management and Education

Clinically significant cognitive impairment in older adults with type 1 diabetes

Chaytor, Naomi S., Barbosa-Leiker, Celestina, Ryan, Christopher M., Germine, Laura T., Hirsch, Irl B., Weinstock, Ruth S.·2019·Journal of Diabetes and its Complications

Abstract

Aims Little is known about cognition in older adults with type 1 diabetes. The aim of this study was to identify correlates of clinically significant cognitive impairment. Methods Neuropsychological, diabetes-related and glycemic (HbA1c, Continuous Glucose Monitoring; CGM) data were collected from 201 older adults (≥60 years) with longstanding type 1 diabetes. Results Clinically significant cognitive impairment (≥2 cognitive tests ≥1.5 SD below normative data) occurred in 48% of the sample. After controlling for age, gender, education and diabetes duration, we found that hypoglycemia unawareness, recent severe hypoglycemic events, any microvascular complication, higher HbA1c and CGM average nocturnal glucose were all associated with increased odds of clinically significant cognitive impairment (ORs = 1.01-2.61), while CGM nocturnal % time below 60 mg/dL was associated with a decreased odds of cognitive impairment (OR = 0.94). Diabetes duration, diagnosis age, daytime CGM, and lifetime severe hypoglycemic events were not related to cognitive impairment status. Conclusions Clinically significant cognitive impairment was common in older adults with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes-related correlates of cognitive impairment were identified, including hypoglycemia unawareness, recent severe hypoglycemic events, and CGM variables. Longitudinal research is needed to determine if these variables predict cognitive decline and if their modification alters outcomes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2018.04.003

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chaytor, N. S., Barbosa-Leiker, C., Ryan, C. M., Germine, L. T., Hirsch, I. B., & Weinstock, R. S.
Affiliations
  • Washington State University Spokane (US)
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
  • University of Washington (US)
  • SUNY Upstate Medical University (US)
Corresponding author
Chaytor, Naomi S.
Venue
Journal of Diabetes and its Complications
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-01
Volume
33
Issue
1
Pages
91-97
ISSN
  • 0891-6632 (ISSN-L)
  • 1056-8727
OpenAlex
W2797996586
Cited by
87
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 1
FWCI
6.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Diabetes and its Complications (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Leona M. and Harry B. Helmsley Charitable Trust
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
Keywords
type 1 diabetes, older adults, cognitive impairment, hypoglycemia unawareness, severe hypoglycemia, glycemic variability, continuous glucose monitoring, HbA1c, microvascular complications, nocturnal hypoglycemia, diabetes duration
MeSH terms
Age Factors, Aged, Blood Glucose, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Female, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents, Insulin, Male, Middle Aged, Neuropsychological Tests, Cognitive Dysfunction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review