Cited by 45Academic integrity and plagiarismscientometrics and bibliometrics researchPublishing and Scholarly Communication

Do journal authors plagiarize? Using plagiarism detection software to uncover matching text across disciplines

Sun, Yu-Chih·2013·Journal of English for Academic Purposes

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jeap.2013.07.002

Cites

61 of 61 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • An increased number of authors in a collaborative study enhances the chance for consecutive text matching, carefree attitude towards responsibility, authorship disputes and data integrity issues, which may lead to misconduct and retraction of collaborative articles.

    “an increased number of authors in a collaborative study was reported to enhance the chance for consecutive text matching, carefree attitude towards responsibility, authorship disputes and data integrity issues which may lead to misconduct and retraction of collaborative articles (Bennett and Taylor 2003; Sun 2013).”
  • Collaborations do not always guarantee ethical behaviour from each collaborator.

    “many studies also highlighted the limitations of collaborations as it always not guarantee ethical behaviour from each collaborator (Sun 2013; Parker and Kingori 2016).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

6 of the 67 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sun, Y.-C.
Affiliations
National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University (TW)
Corresponding author
Sun, Yu-Chih
Venue
Journal of English for Academic Purposes
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-12
Volume
12
Issue
4
Pages
264-272
ISSN
1475-1585 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2027459055
Cited by
45
References
67
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 4
FWCI
8.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of English for Academic Purposes (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Science Council
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Academic integrity and plagiarism
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › scientometrics and bibliometrics research
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Publishing and Scholarly Communication
Keywords
plagiarism, self-plagiarism, plagiarism detection software, Turnitin, number of authors, official languages, English as official language, disciplinary differences, social science journals

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review