The DOI matches its Crossref record; 94 of the 98 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The impact of entrepreneurship education in high school on long-term entrepreneurial performance
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“However, there is a dearth of research on entrepreneurial education in secondary schools (Sánchez, 2013; Moberg, 2014; Elert et al., 2015).”
From Impact of Entrepreneurship Training on Entrepreneurial Efficacy and Alertness among Adolescent Youth (2018) · cites this paper as Elert et al., 2015
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects
ROSENBAUM, P. R., & RUBIN, D. B. (1983) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/70.1.41 · Cited by 31,241
Sarasvathy, S. D. (2001) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2001.4378020 · Cited by 6,478
Matching as an econometric evaluation estimator: Evidence from evaluating a job training programme
Heckman, J. J., Ichimura, H., & Todd, P. E. (1997) · The Review of Economic Studies · doi:10.2307/2971733 · Cited by 5,486
Does matching overcome lalonde’s critique of nonexperimental estimators?
A. Smith, J., & E. Todd, P. (2005) · Journal of Econometrics · doi:10.1016/j.jeconom.2004.04.011 · Cited by 3,176
Reducing Bias in Observational Studies Using Subclassification on the Propensity Score
Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1984) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1984.10478078 · Cited by 3,082
Nonparametric Estimation of Average Treatment Effects Under Exogeneity: A Review
Imbens, G. W. (2004) · Review of Economics and Statistics · doi:10.1162/003465304323023651 · Cited by 2,994
Estimation of Average Treatment Effects Based on Propensity Scores
Becker, S. O., & Ichino, A. (2002) · The Stata Journal Promoting communications on statistics and Stata · doi:10.1177/1536867x0200200403 · Cited by 2,722
Sarasvathy, S. D. (2001) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/259121 · Cited by 2,544
The Emergence of Entrepreneurship Education: Development, Trends, and Challenges
Kuratko, D. F. (2005) · Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6520.2005.00099.x · Cited by 2,411
Causal effects in nonexperimental studies: Reevaluating the evaluation of training programs
Dehejia, R. H., & Wahba, S. (1999) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1999.10473858 · Cited by 2,395
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Nowiński, W., Haddoud, M. Y., Lančarič, D., Egerová, D., & Czeglédi, C. (2017) · Studies in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/03075079.2017.1365359 · Cited by 783
Dhahri, S., & Omri, A. (2018) · World Development · doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2018.01.008 · Cited by 361
Entrepreneurial orientation, entrepreneurial education and performance
Cho, Y. H., & Lee, J.-H. (2018) · Asia Pacific Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship · doi:10.1108/apjie-05-2018-0028 · Cited by 349
Comparing the impact of three different experiential approaches to entrepreneurship in education
Lackéus, M. (2020) · International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour & Research · doi:10.1108/ijebr-04-2018-0236 · Cited by 344
Untapped Riches of Meso-Level Applications in Multilevel Entrepreneurship Mechanisms
Kim, P. H., Wennberg, K. J., & Croidieu, G. P. A. (2016) · Academy of Management Perspectives · doi:10.5465/amp.2015.0137 · Cited by 166
Metadata
- Authors
- Elert, N., Andersson, F. W., & Wennberg, K.
- Affiliations
- Research Institute of Industrial Economics (SE)
- Statistics Sweden (SE)
- Linköping University (SE)
- Corresponding author
- Elert, Niklas
- Venue
- Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-03
- Volume
- 111
- Pages
- 209-223
- ISSN
- 0167-2681 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2055196048
- Cited by
- 290
- References
- 98
- Citations by year
- 2026: 16 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 36 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 54 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 3
- FWCI
- 19.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- papers.ssrn.com
- Locations
- Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- SSRN Electronic Journal (submittedVersion)
- KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Econstor (Econstor) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences
- Social Sciences › Education › Vocational and Entrepreneurial Education
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Firm Innovation and Growth
- Keywords
- entrepreneurship education, high schools, firm entry, business survival, entrepreneurial income, graduate follow-up, youth entrepreneurship
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
