Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 346

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 274 of the 274 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Carbon dioxide removal through physical adsorption using carbonaceous and non-carbonaceous adsorbents: A review

Abd, Ammar Ali, Naji, Samah Zaki, Hashim, Atheer Saad, Othman, Mohd Roslee·2020·Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering

Abstract

Abstract Recently, the catastrophe of global warming by virtue of carbon dioxide emissions has turned into paramount anxiety. To overcome this issue, various carbon dioxide capture and separation processes have been presented so far. Absorption and adsorption are promising methods for carbon dioxide removal, however, the energy penalty drawback of the absorption technology makes the adsorption using solid adsorbents is the prevailing technology nowadays. Adsorption technologies using solid adsorbents eligible for CO2 removal from a gas mixture shown various potential features in comparison with other classic carbon dioxide removal using amine solvents. Thus, numerous groups of researchers have been involved in the modification of new solid adsorbents for carbon dioxide removal with high adsorption capacity and desired economics. Many promising physical adsorbents such as carbonaceous materials (activated carbons, carbon molecular sieve, carbon nanotubes, and graphene) and non-carbonaceous materials (Zeolite-based, silica-based, metal-organic framework materials) for capturing of carbon dioxide have been reviewed. The performance features of the solid adsorbents are evaluated in terms of some desired criteria such as CO2 uptake, CO2 selectivity, adsorbent regeneration, adsorption/regeneration kinetics, and durability. A comprehensive evaluation and analysis study of the literature on the physical solid adsorbents have been executed to update the new progress in this area. A brief comparison of some adsorbents at different stages is located. Finally, some recommendations have been presented for future research to advance the carbon dioxide capturing using physical solid materials.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jece.2020.104142

Cites

274 of 274 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 274 references

Cited by

See all 346

Metadata

Authors
Abd, A. A., Naji, S. Z., Hashim, A. S., & Othman, M. R.
Venue
Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-10
Volume
8
Issue
5
Pages
104142
ISSN
  • 2213-2929 (ISSN-L)
  • 2213-3437
OpenAlex
W3033309695
Cited by
346
References
274
FWCI
17.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Carbon dioxide removal through physical adsorption using carbonaceous and non-carbonaceous adsorbents: A review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jece.2020.104142
The paper
Abd, A. A., Naji, S. Z., Hashim, A. S., & Othman, M. R. (2020). Carbon dioxide removal through physical adsorption using carbonaceous and non-carbonaceous adsorbents: A review. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2020.104142

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.