The DOI matches its Crossref record; 274 of the 274 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Carbon dioxide removal through physical adsorption using carbonaceous and non-carbonaceous adsorbents: A review
Abstract
Abstract Recently, the catastrophe of global warming by virtue of carbon dioxide emissions has turned into paramount anxiety. To overcome this issue, various carbon dioxide capture and separation processes have been presented so far. Absorption and adsorption are promising methods for carbon dioxide removal, however, the energy penalty drawback of the absorption technology makes the adsorption using solid adsorbents is the prevailing technology nowadays. Adsorption technologies using solid adsorbents eligible for CO2 removal from a gas mixture shown various potential features in comparison with other classic carbon dioxide removal using amine solvents. Thus, numerous groups of researchers have been involved in the modification of new solid adsorbents for carbon dioxide removal with high adsorption capacity and desired economics. Many promising physical adsorbents such as carbonaceous materials (activated carbons, carbon molecular sieve, carbon nanotubes, and graphene) and non-carbonaceous materials (Zeolite-based, silica-based, metal-organic framework materials) for capturing of carbon dioxide have been reviewed. The performance features of the solid adsorbents are evaluated in terms of some desired criteria such as CO2 uptake, CO2 selectivity, adsorbent regeneration, adsorption/regeneration kinetics, and durability. A comprehensive evaluation and analysis study of the literature on the physical solid adsorbents have been executed to update the new progress in this area. A brief comparison of some adsorbents at different stages is located. Finally, some recommendations have been presented for future research to advance the carbon dioxide capturing using physical solid materials.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Graphene and Graphene Oxide: Synthesis, Properties, and Applications
Zhu, Y., Murali, S., Cai, W., Li, X., Suk, J. W., Potts, J. R., & Ruoff, R. S. (2010) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201001068 · Cited by 10,522
Selective gas adsorption and separation in metal–organic frameworks
Li, J.-R., Kuppler, R. J., & Zhou, H.-C. (2009) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/b802426j · Cited by 8,932
Design and synthesis of an exceptionally stable and highly porous metal-organic framework
Li, H., Eddaoudi, M., O'Keeffe, M., & Yaghi, O. M. (1999) · Nature · doi:10.1038/46248 · Cited by 8,554
Carbon capture and storage (CCS): the way forward
Bui, M., Adjiman, C. S., Bardow, A., Anthony, E. J., Boston, A., Brown, S., Fennell, P. S., Fuss, S., Galindo, A., Hackett, L. A., et al. (2018) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/c7ee02342a · Cited by 4,374
High-Throughput Synthesis of Zeolitic Imidazolate Frameworks and Application to CO 2 Capture
Banerjee, R., Phan, A., Wang, B., Knobler, C., Furukawa, H., O'Keeffe, M., & Yaghi, O. M. (2008) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1152516 · Cited by 4,205
Ultrahigh Porosity in Metal-Organic Frameworks
Furukawa, H., Ko, N., Go, Y. B., Aratani, N., Choi, S. B., Choi, E., Yazaydin, A. Ö., Snurr, R. Q., O’Keeffe, M., Kim, J., et al. (2010) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1192160 · Cited by 3,904
Millward, A. R., & Yaghi, O. M. (2005) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja0570032 · Cited by 2,876
Water Stability and Adsorption in Metal–Organic Frameworks
Burtch, N. C., Jasuja, H., & Walton, K. S. (2014) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr5002589 · Cited by 2,730
Synthesis, Structure, and Carbon Dioxide Capture Properties of Zeolitic Imidazolate Frameworks
Phan, A., Doonan, C. J., Uribe-Romo, F. J., Knobler, C. B., O’Keeffe, M., & Yaghi, O. M. (2010) · Accounts of Chemical Research · doi:10.1021/ar900116g · Cited by 2,618
Adsorbent Materials for Carbon Dioxide Capture from Large Anthropogenic Point Sources
Choi, S., Drese, J. H., & Jones, C. W. (2009) · ChemSusChem · doi:10.1002/cssc.200900036 · Cited by 2,596
Cited by
Recent advances in carbon capture storage and utilisation technologies: a review
Osman, A. I., Hefny, M., Abdel Maksoud, M. I. A., Elgarahy, A. M., & Rooney, D. W. (2021) · Environmental Chemistry Letters · doi:10.1007/s10311-020-01133-3 · Cited by 862
Adsorption of Carbon Dioxide for post-combustion capture: a review
Raganati, F., Miccio, F., & Ammendola, P. (2021) · Energy & Fuels · doi:10.1021/acs.energyfuels.1c01618 · Cited by 661
Shafawi, A. N., Mohamed, A. R., Lahijani, P., & Mohammadi, M. (2021) · Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.jece.2021.106869 · Cited by 187
Abd, A. A., Othman, M. R., Shabbani, H. J. K., & Helwani, Z. (2022) · Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.jece.2022.107169 · Cited by 38
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Abd, A. A., Naji, S. Z., Hashim, A. S., & Othman, M. R.
- Venue
- Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-10
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 104142
- ISSN
- 2213-2929 (ISSN-L)
- 2213-3437
- OpenAlex
- W3033309695
- Cited by
- 346
- References
- 274
- FWCI
- 17.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Carbon dioxide removal through physical adsorption using carbonaceous and non-carbonaceous adsorbents: A review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jece.2020.104142
- The paper
- Abd, A. A., Naji, S. Z., Hashim, A. S., & Othman, M. R. (2020). Carbon dioxide removal through physical adsorption using carbonaceous and non-carbonaceous adsorbents: A review. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2020.104142
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.