Cited by 29Thermochemical Biomass Conversion ProcessesCatalysts for Methane ReformingSupercapacitor Materials and Fabrication

Upcycling of real-world HDPE plastic wastes into high-purity methane and hierarchical porous carbon materials: Influence of plastics additives

Zhou, Xiaoli, He, Pinjing, Peng, Wei, Lü, Fan, Shao, Liming, Zhang, Hua·2023·Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jece.2023.109327

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Zhou et al. converted actual HDPE waste containing calcium carbonate and carbon black additives into methane and hierarchical porous carbon via self-pressurized pyrolysis coupled with KOH activation; methane purity was >93%, HPC specific surface area was 2,785-2,913 m2/g, and HPC supercapacitors showed 301 F/g at 1 A/g, 89.1% capacitance retention at 20 A/g, and 82% capacity retention after 5,000

    “Addressing the issue of real-world plastic waste (PWs) containing additives, Zhou and colleagues utilized actual high-density polyethylene (HDPE) plastic waste containing calcium carbonate (CaCO 3 ), and carbon black additives [36] .The conversion of PWs into methane and hierarchical porous carbon (HPC) material was achieved through a self-pressurized pyrolysis process coupled with KOH activation.”
  • Zhou et al. found that additives had minimal impact on product distribution and methane content but significantly altered the structural morphology and performance of hierarchical porous carbon, increasing mesopores and macropores and surface functional groups while reducing graphitization.

    “The study found that although additives had minimal impact on the product distribution and methane content, they significantly altered the structural morphology and performance characteristics of the HPC.The HPC prepared from the additive-containing system showed an increased proportion of mesopores and macropores and richer surface functional groups, but a reduced degree of graphitization.”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 49 · Cited by 29

Authors
Zhou, X., He, P., Peng, W., Lü, F., Shao, L., & Zhang, H.
Affiliations
Tongji University (CN)
Corresponding author
Zhang, Hua
Venue
Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-04
Volume
11
Issue
2
Pages
109327
ISSN
  • 2213-2929 (ISSN-L)
  • 2213-3437
OpenAlex
W4316035395
Cited by
29
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 7
FWCI
2.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of environmental chemical engineering (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China
  • Postdoctoral Research Foundation of China
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
  • Physical Sciences › Chemical Engineering › Catalysis › Catalysts for Methane Reforming
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials › Supercapacitor Materials and Fabrication
Keywords
high-density polyethylene, plastic waste upcycling, methane production, hierarchical porous carbon, supercapacitors, polymer additives, calcium carbonate, carbon black, pyrolysis, KOH activation, specific capacitance, cycling stability, graphitization degree, surface functional groups

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review