The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
SnO2-based electron transporting layer materials for perovskite solar cells: A review of recent progress
Abstract
Abstract In recent years, due to their high photo-to-electric power conversion efficiency (PCE) (up to 23% (certified)) and low cost, perovskite solar cells (PSCs) have attracted a great deal of attention in photovoltaics field. The high PCE can be attributed to the excellent physical properties of organic–inorganic hybrid perovskite materials, such as a long charge diffusion length and a high absorption coefficient in the visible range. There are different diffusion lengths of holes in electrons in a PSC device, and thus the electron transporting layer (ETL) plays a critical role in the performance of PSCs. An alternative for TiO2, to the most common ETL material is SnO2, which has similar physical properties to TiO2 but with much higher electron mobility, which is beneficial for electron extraction. In addition, there are many facile methods to fabricate SnO2 nanomaterials with low cost and low energy consumption. In this review paper, we focus on recent developments in SnO2 as the ETL of PSCs. The fabrication methods of SnO2 materials are briefly introduced. The influence of multiple SnO2 types in the ETL on the performance of PSCs is then reviewed. Different methods for improving the PCE and long-term stability of PSCs based on SnO2 ETL are also summarized. The review provides a systematic and comprehensive understanding of the influence of different SnO2 ETL types on PSC performance and potentially motivates further development of PSCs with an extension to SnO2-based PSCs.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Kim, H.-S., Lee, C.-R., Im, J.-H., Lee, K.-B., Moehl, T., Marchioro, A., Moon, S.-J., Humphry-Baker, R., Yum, J.-H., Moser, J. E., et al. (2012) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep00591 · Cited by 8,092
Cited by
Tin oxide for optoelectronic, photovoltaic and energy storage devices: a review
Dalapati, G. K., Sharma, H., Guchhait, A., Chakrabarty, N., Bamola, P., Liu, Q., Saianand, G., Sai Krishna, A. M., Mukhopadhyay, S., Dey, A., et al. (2021) · Journal of Materials Chemistry A · doi:10.1039/d1ta01291f · Cited by 406
Carbon-based materials for stable, cheaper and large-scale processable perovskite solar cells
Fagiolari, L., & Bella, F. (2019) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/c9ee02115a · Cited by 355
She, C., Huang, Q., Chen, C., Jiang, Y., Fan, Z., & Gao, J. (2021) · Journal of Materials Chemistry A · doi:10.1039/d1ta08194b · Cited by 59
Carani, L. B., Eze, V. O., Iwuagwu, C., & Okoli, O. I. (2020) · Journal of Composites Science · doi:10.3390/jcs4040190 · Cited by 12
Metadata
- Authors
- Chen, Y., Meng, Q., Zhang, L., Han, C., Gao, H., Zhang, Y., & Yan, H.
- Venue
- Journal of Energy Chemistry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-08
- Volume
- 35
- Pages
- 144-167
- ISSN
- 2095-4956 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2912190016
- Cited by
- 197
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: SnO2-based electron transporting layer materials for perovskite solar cells: A review of recent progress. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jechem.2018.11.011
- The paper
- Chen, Y., Meng, Q., Zhang, L., Han, C., Gao, H., Zhang, Y., & Yan, H. (2019). SnO2-based electron transporting layer materials for perovskite solar cells: A review of recent progress. Journal of Energy Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jechem.2018.11.011
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.