Cited by 366School Choice and PerformanceIntergenerational and Educational Inequality StudiesLabor market dynamics and wage inequality

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

The effect of schooling and ability on achievement test scores

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jeconom.2003.10.011

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Heckman, Stixrud and Urzua [2006] allow lifetime experiences and investments to determine, in part, the coefficients of the factor model and to affect the factor itself.

    “Generalizing the analysis of Hansen, Heckman and Mullen [2004], Heckman, Stixrud and Urzua [2006] allow for lifetime experiences and investments to determine, in part, the coefficients of the factor model and to affect the factor itself.”

    From Personality Psychology and Economics (2011) · cites this paper as Hansen, Heckman and Mullen [2004]

  • Hansen, Heckman and Mullen [2004] and Heckman, Stixrud and Urzua [2006] show that schooling and other acquired traits substantially causally affect measured cognitive and personality test scores.

    “Hansen, Heckman and Mullen [2004], and Heckman, Stixrud and Urzua [2006] show how schooling and other acquired traits substantially causally affect measured cognitive and personality test scores.”

    From Personality Psychology and Economics (2011) · cites this paper as Hansen, Heckman and Mullen [2004]

  • Schooling in the high school years has moderate but positive effects on measures of cognition.

    “Schooling in the high school years has moderate but positive effects on the measures of cognition, consistent with previous research by Hansen, Heckman and Mullen [2004], Neal and Johnson [1996], and Winship and Korenman [1997].”

    From Personality Psychology and Economics (2011) · cites this paper as Hansen, Heckman and Mullen [2004]

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 45 · Cited by 366

Research works printed but not linked: 24

  1. Altonji, 2001, Employer learning and statistical discrimination, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116, 313, 10.1162/003355301556329 · DOI
  2. Ashenfelter, 1994, Estimates of the economic returns to schooling from a new sample of twins, American Economic Review, 84, 1157
  3. Cameron, 1993, The nonequivalence of high school equivalents, Journal of Labor Economics, 11, 1, 10.1086/298316 · DOI
  4. Cameron, 1998, Life cycle schooling and dynamic selection bias, Journal of Political Economy, 106, 262, 10.1086/250010 · DOI
  5. Cameron, 2001, The dynamics of educational attainment for black, hispanic, and white males, Journal of Political Economy, 109, 455, 10.1086/321014 · DOI
  6. Carneiro, 2003, Estimating distribution of treatment effects counterfactuals with an application to the returns to schooling and measurement of the effects of uncertainty on college choice, International Economic Review, 44, 361, 10.1111/1468-2354.t01-1-00074 · DOI
  7. Ceci, 1991, How much does schooling influence general intelligence and its cognitive components?: a reassessment of the evidence, Developmental Psychology, 27, 703, 10.1037/0012-1649.27.5.703 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Hanushek, E., 2002. Publicly provided education. In: Auerbach, A., Feldstein, M. (Eds.), Handbook of Public Economics, Vol. 4. North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 2045–2141. · DOI
  9. Heckman, 1974, Effects of child-care programs on women's work effort, Journal of Political Economy, 82, S136, 10.1086/260297 · DOI
  10. Heckman, J., 1980. Addendum to sample selection bias as a specification error. In: Stromsdorfer, E., Farkas, G. (Eds.), Evaluation Studies Review Annual, Vol. 5. Sage Publications, Beverley Hills, CA.
  11. Heckman, J., 1981. Statistical models for discrete panel data. In: Manski, C., McFadden, D. (Eds.), Structural Analysis of Discrete Data With Econometric Applications. MIT Press, Cambridge.
  12. Heckman, 1990, The empirical content of the Roy model, Econometrica, 58, 1121, 10.2307/2938303 · DOI
  13. Heckman, 1985, Alternative methods for evaluating the impact of interventions, Journal of Econometrics, 30, 239, 10.1016/0304-4076(85)90139-3 · DOI
  14. Heckman, J., Robb, R., 1986. Alternative methods for solving the problem of selection bias in evaluating the impact of treatments on outcomes. In: Wainer, H. (Ed.), Drawing Inferences from Self-selected Samples. Lawrence Erlbaum, New Jersey, Reprinted 2000. · DOI
  15. Heckman, 2001, The importance of noncognitive skills, American Economic Review, 91, 145, 10.1257/aer.91.2.145 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Heckman, 2001, Identifying the role of cognitive ability in explaining the level of and change in the return to schooling, Review of Economics and Statistics, 83, 1, 10.1162/003465301750159993 · DOI
  17. Kotlarski, 1967, On characterizing the gamma and normal distribution, Pacific Journal of Mathematics, 20, 69, 10.2140/pjm.1967.20.69 · DOI
  18. Manski, 1988, Identification of binary response models, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 83, 729, 10.2307/2289298 · DOI
  19. Matzkin, 1993, Nonparametric identification and estimation of polychotomous choice models, Journal of Econometrics, 58, 137, 10.1016/0304-4076(93)90116-M · DOI
  20. McCulloch, 1994, An exact likelihood analysis of the multinomial probit model, Journal of Econometrics, 64, 207, 10.1016/0304-4076(94)90064-7 · DOI
  21. McFadden, D., 1984. Econometric analysis of qualitative response models. In: Griliches, Z., Intriligator, M.D. (Eds.), Handbook of Econometrics, Vol. II. North-Holland, Amsterdam. · DOI
  22. Neal, 1996, The role of premarket factors in black–white wage differences, Journal of Political Economy, 104, 869, 10.1086/262045 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Olley, 1996, The dynamics of productivity in the telecommunications equipment industry, Econometrica, 64, 1263, 10.2307/2171831 · DOI
  24. Richardson, 2002, Mixture models in measurement error problems, with reference to epidemiological studies, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society), 165, 549, 10.1111/1467-985X.00252 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Hansen, K. T., Heckman, J. J., & Mullen, K. J.
Affiliations
  • Northwestern University (US)
  • American Bar Foundation (US)
  • University of Chicago (US)
Corresponding author
Heckman, James J.
Venue
Journal of Econometrics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2004-07
Volume
121
Issue
1-2
Pages
39-98
ISSN
0304-4076 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2169307545
Cited by
366
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 27 · 2013: 25 · 2012: 24
FWCI
84.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Econometrics (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › School Choice and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Intergenerational and Educational Inequality Studies
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Labor market dynamics and wage inequality
Keywords
returns to education, achievement test scores, latent ability, endogeneity of schooling, Armed Forces Qualification Test, ability distribution, educational attainment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review