The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Strategy choices in simple and complex addition: Contributions of working memory and counting knowledge for children with mathematical disability
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The episodic buffer: a new component of working memory?
Baddeley, A. (2000) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/s1364-6613(00)01538-2 · Cited by 7,359 · cited 2×
“According to Baddeley (1986, 2000), working memory is dependent on a central executive that is expressed as attention-driven control of information represented in three slave systems, a language-related phonetic system, a visuospatial sketch pad, and an episodic buffer.”
MethodThe Development of Working Memory in Normally Achieving and Subtypes of Learning Disabled Children
Siegel, L. S., & Ryan, E. B. (1989) · Child Development · doi:10.2307/1131037 · Cited by 842
Developmental change in speed of processing during childhood and adolescence
Kail, R. (1991) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.109.3.490 · Cited by 673 · cited 1×
“The latter include one or some combination of an improved ability to control the focus of attention , increased speed of processing information represented in the slave systems, or slower decay of information represented in the slave systems (e.g., Cowan, Saults, & Elliott, 2002; Kail, 1991).”
BackgroundBull, R., & Johnston, R. S. (1997) · Journal of Experimental Child Psychology · doi:10.1006/jecp.1996.2358 · Cited by 381 · cited 2×
“…has focused on how young children with MD solve simple problems (e.g., 4 + 5; Garnett & Fleischner, 1983; Geary, 1990; Jordan & Montani, 1997), and less commonly on the cognitive mechanisms that may underlie these performance characteristics (Bull & Johnston, 1997; Geary, Bow-Thomas, & Yao, 1992).”
Background
Cited by
Raghubar, K. P., Barnes, M. A., & Hecht, S. A. (2010) · Learning and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2009.10.005 · Cited by 975
Adaptive training leads to sustained enhancement of poor working memory in children
Holmes, J., Gathercole, S. E., & Dunning, D. L. (2009) · Developmental Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-7687.2009.00848.x · Cited by 961
Cognitive predictors of achievement growth in mathematics: A 5-year longitudinal study.
Geary, D. C. (2011) · Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0025510 · Cited by 836
Self-citationGeary, D. C., Hoard, M. K., Byrd-Craven, J., Nugent, L., & Numtee, C. (2007) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01069.x · Cited by 824
Self-citationWorking memory in children with reading disabilities
Gathercole, S. E., Alloway, T. P., Willis, C., & Adams, A.-M. (2006) · Journal of Experimental Child Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2005.08.003 · Cited by 795
Metadata
- Authors
- Geary, D. C., Hoard, M. K., Byrd-Craven, J., & Catherine DeSoto, M.
- Venue
- Journal of Experimental Child Psychology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2004-06
- Volume
- 88
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 121-151
- ISSN
- 0022-0965 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2017082119
- Cited by
- 575
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 10.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Strategy choices in simple and complex addition: Contributions of working memory and counting knowledge for children with mathematical disability. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jecp.2004.03.002
- The paper
- Geary, D. C., Hoard, M. K., Byrd-Craven, J., & Catherine DeSoto, M. (2004). Strategy choices in simple and complex addition: Contributions of working memory and counting knowledge for children with mathematical disability. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2004.03.002
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.