Cited by 163Reading and Literacy DevelopmentSecond Language Acquisition and LearningLanguage Development and Disorders

Tracking the acquisition of orthographic skills in developing readers: Masked priming effects

Castles, Anne, Davis, Chris, Cavalot, Pauline, Forster, Kenneth·2007·Journal of Experimental Child Psychology

Abstract

A masked priming procedure was used to explore developmental changes in the tuning of lexical word recognition processes. Lexical tuning was assessed by examining the degree of masked form priming and used two different types of prime-target lexical similarity: one letter different (e.g., rlay-->PLAY) and transposed letters (e.g., lpay-->PLAY). The performance of skilled adult readers was compared with that of developing readers in Grade 3. The same children were then tested again two years later, when they were in Grade 5. The skilled adult readers showed no form priming, indicating that their recognition mechanisms for these items had become finely tuned. In contrast, the Grade 3 readers showed substantial form priming effects for both measures of lexical similarity. When retested in Grade 5, the developing readers no longer showed significant one letter different priming, but transposed letter priming remained. In general, these results provide evidence for a transition from more broadly tuned to more finely tuned lexical recognition mechanisms and are interpreted in the context of models of word recognition.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jecp.2007.01.006

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Development of parallel orthographic processing increases sensitivity to orthographic priming.

    “(3) an increased sensitivity to orthographic priming (e.g., Castles et al., 2007; Acha and Perea, 2008)”

    From A Dual-Route Approach to Orthographic Processing (2011) · cites this paper as Castles et al., 2007

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Castles, A., Davis, C., Cavalot, P., & Forster, K.
Affiliations
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
  • University of Arizona (US)
Corresponding author
Castles, Anne
Venue
Journal of Experimental Child Psychology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-07
Volume
97
Issue
3
Pages
165-182
ISSN
0022-0965 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2051032393
Cited by
163
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 16
FWCI
6.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Experimental Child Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
Keywords
spelling development, word recognition, masked priming, form priming, letter similarity, reading acquisition, developmental changes, children's reading
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Cognition, Humans, Learning, Perceptual Masking, Reading, Vocabulary, Recognition, Psychology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review