A Dual-Route Approach to Orthographic Processing
Open accessAbstract
In the present theoretical note we examine how different learning constraints, thought to be involved in optimizing the mapping of print to meaning during reading acquisition, might shape the nature of the orthographic code involved in skilled reading.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
10 of 107 cited sources checked · 7 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
The differential time-course of orthographic and phonological effects has been revealed in masked priming studies.
“This differential time-course of effects has been revealed on several occasions in studies of masked orthographic and phonological priming (Ferrand and Grainger, 1994; Ziegler et al., 2000).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked - Interpretationcitation
Development of parallel orthographic processing reduces phonological effects that arise principally via phonological recoding.
“(2) a reduction in phonological effects that arise principally via phonological recoding (e.g., Sprenger-Charolles et al., 2003)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Sprenger-Charolles et al., 2003 source
The Development of Reading and Spelling Skills section reports that the expected fading of the regularity effect—a measure of reliance on phonological processing—appeared in reading latencies only, from the end of Grade 3. It did not appear in spelling, and phonological effects persisted in other measures. The unqualified claim of a reduction is therefore broader than the paper's findings. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Sublexical morpho-orthographic processing is performed by neural structures in fusiform gyrus.
“With respect to the role of fusiform gyrus in fine-grained orthographic processing as defined in our account, it is important to note that there is evidence suggesting that sublexical morpho-orthographic processing is performed by neural structures in this region (Bick et al., 2011; Solomyak and Marantz, 2009).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites Bick et al., 2011 source
The Discussion (page unavailable) says the left occipito-temporal region is involved in a structural level of morphological processing that is mainly morpho-orthographic. It does not identify the region showing that effect specifically as the fusiform gyrus, so the claim’s precise anatomical location is not established by our copy. (LLM, conf=0.83)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites Solomyak and Marantz, 2009 source
- Findingown data
Intact derived primes produced significant priming.
“we found significant priming from intact derived primes (e.g., farmer–farm) and TL derived primes (e.g., faremr–farm), as well significant priming from intact pseudo-derived primes (e.g., corner–corn), but most important, no priming from TL pseudo-derivations (e.g., corenr–corn).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Intact pseudo-derived primes produced significant priming.
“we found significant priming from intact derived primes (e.g., farmer–farm) and TL derived primes (e.g., faremr–farm), as well significant priming from intact pseudo-derived primes (e.g., corner–corn), but most important, no priming from TL pseudo-derivations (e.g., corenr–corn).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- Findingown data
TL pseudo-derived primes produced no priming.
“we found significant priming from intact derived primes (e.g., farmer–farm) and TL derived primes (e.g., faremr–farm), as well significant priming from intact pseudo-derived primes (e.g., corner–corn), but most important, no priming from TL pseudo-derivations (e.g., corenr–corn).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
TL derived primes produced significant priming.
“we found significant priming from intact derived primes (e.g., farmer–farm) and TL derived primes (e.g., faremr–farm), as well significant priming from intact pseudo-derived primes (e.g., corner–corn), but most important, no priming from TL pseudo-derivations (e.g., corenr–corn).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
During reading acquisition, optimizing the mapping from print to meaning also involves detecting letter combinations that match pre-existing sublexical phonological and morphological representations (the chunking constraint).
“and on the other hand to involve the detection of letter combinations that correspond to pre-existing sublexical phonological and morphological representations (chunking constraint)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
The BIAM accounts for a wide range of visual word recognition phenomena, including rapid involvement of phonological codes in silent word reading.
“The specific architecture of the BIAM allows it to account for a wide range of phenomena associated with visual word recognition, and in particular, the rapid involvement of phonological codes in the process of silent word reading”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Braun et al., 2009
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Diependaele et al., 2010
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Grainger and Ziegler, 2008
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
A flexible orthographic code such as open-bigram coding is unlikely to provide appropriate input for sublexical translation of orthography to phonology.
“As pointed out by Goswami and Ziegler (2006), however, this kind of flexible orthographic code is unlikely to provide an appropriate input for the sublexical translation of orthography to phonology.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Goswami and Ziegler (2006)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
The fine-grained route enables chunking of frequently co-occurring contiguous letter combinations that serve as units for morpho-orthographic processing (prefixes and suffixes) and for sublexical print-to-sound conversion (multi-letter graphemes).
“This enables the chunking of frequently co-occurring contiguous letter combinations that form relevant units for morpho-orthographic processing (prefixes and suffixes) and for the sublexical translation of print to sound (multi-letter graphemes).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation
For location-invariant word recognition, the location-specific map must be transformed into a word-centered code that ties letter identity to within-word position independently of retinal location.
“However, for the purposes of location-invariant word recognition, this location-specific map must be transformed into a “word-centered” code such that letter identity is tied to within-word position (where a word is defined as a string of letters separated by spaces) independently of retinal location”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Caramazza and Hillis, 1990 source
- Premisecitation
The dual-route approach provides a comprehensive account of reading aloud in skilled adult readers and dyslexics.
“In its most recent form, the dual-route approach provides a comprehensive account of phenomena related to the process of reading aloud in skilled adult readers and dyslexics”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Perry et al., 2007, 2010
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationcitation
Knowing only that S is somewhere before H would generate too many false positive coding or binding errors, such as detecting 'sh' in 'sahara'.
“Knowing that S is somewhere before H (as in an open-bigram coding scheme) would generate too many false positive coding errors or binding errors (von der Malsburg, 1999), such as identifying the presence of the complex grapheme “sh” in the word “sahara.””
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites von der Malsburg, 1999 source
- Premisereasoning
An open-bigram representation is activated by words containing the two letters in that order regardless of how many letters intervene.
“Therefore, exactly the same open-bigram representation (e.g., T–A) would be activated by words containing these two letters in that order independently of how many intervening letters there are”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisereasoning
Processing at the alphabetic array is insensitive to the orthographic regularity of letter strings.
“Thus, processing at the level of the alphabetic array is insensitive to the orthographic regularity of letter strings.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Many models of visual word recognition, including the BIAM, use a single type of sublexical orthographic code.
“One key feature of many models of visual word recognition, including the BIAM, is that there is a single type of sublexical orthographic code.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites McClelland and Rumelhart, 1981 source
- Premisecitation
In the Grainger and van Heuven model, the alphabetic array codes for a letter's presence at a location relative to eye fixation along the horizontal meridian, independently of other letters.
“In the Grainger and van Heuven model of orthographic processing (Figure 2), the alphabetic array codes for the presence of a given letter at a given location relative to eye fixation along the horizontal meridian.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Grainger and van Heuven (2003)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
The present dual-route approach postulates two fundamentally different kinds of location-invariant, word-centered, sublexical orthographic codes.
“In the present article, we describe a dual-route approach to orthographic processing that postulates the existence of two fundamentally different kinds of location-invariant, word-centered, sublexical, orthographic codes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Computing the identity of a complex grapheme such as 'sh' requires knowing that H immediately follows S.
“In order to compute the identity of complex graphemes such as “sh,” you need to know that H immediately follows S.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The coarse-grained route codes combinations of the most visible letters that best constrain word identity.
“That is, the strategy of this route is to code for combinations of the most visible letters that best constrain word identity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Letter combinations encountered less often in other words are more diagnostic of the identity of the word being processed.
“Letter combinations that are encountered less often in other words are more diagnostic of the identity of the word being processed.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The alphabetic array should feed into two different types of location-invariant sublexical codes.
“This observation suggests that the initial phase of orthographic processing in the Grainger and van Heuven (2003) model, the alphabetic array, should feed into two different types of location-invariant sublexical codes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Rigid slot-coding schemes cannot account for transposed-letter effects.
“Rigid slot-coding schemes cannot account for transposed-letter effects (see Grainger, 2008, for review).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Grainger, 2008
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationcitation
The system needs to know the precise ordering of letter identities in the stimulus word.
“That is, the system needs to know precisely the ordering of the different letter identities in the stimulus word”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Goswami and Ziegler, 2006
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
The fine-grained code enables coding of multi-letter graphemes and their precise ordering in the string.
“This fine-grained code enables the coding of multi-letter graphemes and their precise ordering in the string.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
The shift from precise slot-coding to flexible coding was mainly motivated by letter transposition effects in masked priming and in unprimed lexical decision.
“Now, one key empirical phenomenon provided the principal motivation for the theoretical shift from overly precise letter position coding schemes, such as the slot-coding scheme of the interactive-activation model (McClelland and Rumelhart, 1981), to more flexible coding schemes such as open-bigram coding. That was the effects of letter transpositions observed in masked priming experiments”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Perea and Lupker, 2004
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Schoonbaert and Grainger, 2004
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Chambers, 1979
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisenone given
Processing pseudo-homophones involves some form of sublexical conversion of print-to-sound.
“Pseudo-homophone effects represent one key empirical signature of fine-grained orthographic processing, since it is generally agreed that the processing of such stimuli involves some form of sublexical conversion of print-to-sound.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given
The coarse-grained route computes a code to rapidly identify a unique word and its semantic representations.
“In one route, a coarse-grained orthographic code is computed in order to rapidly home in on a unique word identity and the corresponding semantic representations (the fast track to semantics).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The multiple-route model predicts that a transposed-letter manipulation should eradicate pseudo-homophone priming effects.
“Our multiple-route model makes one key prediction with respect to effects of pseudo-homophone primes. These effects should be eradicated by a transposed-letter manipulation, since precise letter order information is required along the fine-grained processing route that generates a sublexical phonological code.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given
Frequency of co-occurrence enables the formation of higher-order representations (chunking) that reduce the amount of information processed via data compression.
“On the other hand, frequency of co-occurrence enables the formation of higher-order representations (chunking) in order to diminish the amount of information that is processed, via data compression.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationcitation
The reduced transposed-letter effects with legal non-words likely reflect more efficient computation of a phonological code.
“We agree with Frankish and Turner (2007) and Frankish and Barnes (2008), that the reduced TL effects seen with legal non-words most likely reflect the more efficient computation of a phonological code with this kind of non-word compared with the illegal non-words.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Frankish and Turner (2007)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Frankish and Barnes (2008)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
Precise letter order is required for pseudo-homophone priming because phoneme representations are activated via the fine-grained orthographic code.
“That is, according to our approach, precise letter order information is required in order to generate a pseudo-homophone priming effect because phoneme representations are activated via the fine-grained orthographic code.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
In the model, the route from print to meaning via sublexical phonological representations involves fine-grained orthographic processing.
“According to the model depicted in Figure 4, the route from print to meaning via sublexical phonological representations, involves fine-grained orthographic processing.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
When top-down constraints are absent, the slower fine-grained route provides disambiguating information.
“In the absence of such additional top-down constraints, processing along the slower fine-grained route will also provide disambiguating information when necessary”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Frequently co-occurring letter combinations can be grouped into higher-level orthographic representations such as multi-letter graphemes and morphemes, linking to pre-existing phonological and morphological representations.
“Letter combinations that often occur together can be usefully grouped to form higher-level orthographic representations such as multi-letter graphemes (th, ch) and morphemes (ing, er), thus providing a link with pre-existing phonological and morphological representations during reading acquisition.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Pseudo-homophone effects are a key empirical signature of fine-grained orthographic processing.
“Pseudo-homophone effects represent one key empirical signature of fine-grained orthographic processing, since it is generally agreed that the processing of such stimuli involves some form of sublexical conversion of print-to-sound.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The motivation for the two routes in this approach is not the traditional direct orthographic versus indirect phonological pathway distinction.
“However, contrary to alternative dual-route accounts of orthographic processing (e.g., Whitney and Cornelissen, 2005, 2008), the motivation behind the two routes in our approach is not based on the traditional distinction between direct “orthographic” and indirect “phonological” pathways in reading”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Whitney and Cornelissen, 2005, 2008
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
ERP research compared priming from transposed-letter primes with priming from pseudo-homophone primes.
“Most important is that the latter research compared priming from transposed-letter primes (e.g., barin–BRAIN vs. bolin–BRAIN) with priming from pseudo-homophone primes (e.g., brane–BRAIN vs. brans–BRAIN).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Grainger et al., 2006b
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Effects of transposed-letter primes appeared in ERP waveforms about 50 ms before pseudo-homophone priming effects.
“Effects of transposed-letter primes were seen in the ERP waveforms about 50 ms before the emergence of pseudo-homophone priming effects.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Grainger et al., 2006b
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationnone given
Even in spoken language, diagnosticity and chunking can be distinguished.
“However, even in the domain of spoken language one can draw a distinction between diagnosticity and chunking.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisenone given
Frequency of occurrence determines the probability that a given letter combination belongs to the word being read.
“On the one hand, frequency of occurrence determines the probability with which a given combination of letters belongs to the word being read.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Masked priming evidence supports coarse orthographic coding: transposed-letter primes, subset primes, and superset primes produce robust priming effects.
“Empirical evidence in favor of this type of coarse orthographic coding has been obtained using the masked priming paradigm in the form of robust priming effects with transposed-letter primes (e.g., gadren-GARDEN: Perea and Lupker, 2004; Schoonbaert and Grainger, 2004), and subset and superset primes”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Perea and Lupker, 2004
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Schoonbaert and Grainger, 2004
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Peressotti and Grainger, 1999
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationnone given
The fine-grained orthographic code provides more precise information about the ordering of letters in the string.
“On the right-hand side of Figure 3, the fine-grained orthographic code provides more precise information about the ordering of letters in the string.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Experiments manipulating orthographic regularity and pronounceability of transposed-letter non-words provide another line of evidence for the dual-route approach.
“Another line of evidence in favor of this dual-route approach comes from experiments manipulating the orthographic regularity and pronounceability of non-word stimuli created by a letter transposition”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Frankish and Turner, 2007
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Frankish and Barnes, 2008
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
Precise ordering is particularly important for extracting contiguous letter combinations that form multi-letter grapheme representations.
“This is particularly important for extracting contiguous letter combinations that form multi-letter grapheme representations, such as the “ch” and “ai” in the word “chair.””
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Derived suffixed primes facilitate recognition of stem targets relative to unrelated primes in masked priming.
“A large number of masked priming studies have shown that derived suffixed primes facilitate the recognition of stem targets (worker–work) relative to unrelated primes (e.g., Grainger et al., 1991).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Grainger et al., 1991
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationcitation
Given variations in letter visibility, computing order and identity information for the most visible letters is the most efficient way to obtain a fast guess at word identity.
“The key idea behind this proposal is that given variations in letter visibility across a string of letters (e.g., Stevens and Grainger, 2003), the most efficient means of obtaining a fast guess at word identity is to compute order and identity information for the most visible letters.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Stevens and Grainger, 2003
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
Open-bigram coding is one possible implementation of the coarse-grained orthographic processing route.
“We nevertheless point out that open-bigram coding is only one possible implementation of the coarse-grained orthographic processing route of our dual-route approach.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Whitney, 2001
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Grainger and van Heuven, 2003
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Grainger and Whitney, 2004
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
This phonological code, generated via the fine-grained route, interferes with the coarse-grained route's output, reducing evidence for the baseword.
“This phonological code, generated via the fine-grained processing route in our model, would interfere with the output of the coarse-grained processing route, therefore reducing the evidence in favor of the presence of the baseword”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given
The two routes differ notably in the precision with which they code letter position information.
“The two routes differ notably in terms of the level of precision with which letter position information is coded.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Semantically opaque complex primes and pseudo-complex primes produce priming similar to semantically transparent complex primes.
“Both these prime types show priming that is similar to that of semantically transparent complex primes (worker–work; see Rastle and Davis, 2008 for review)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Rastle and Davis, 2008
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
Development of parallel orthographic processing enables emergence of morpho-semantic and morpho-orthographic representations via combination of coarse-grained and fine-grained processing.
“and (3) the emergence of both morpho-semantic and morpho-orthographic representations via the combination of coarse-grained and fine-grained orthographic processing.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation
Affix detection is the key mechanism underlying morpho-orthographic segmentation.
“More precisely, we propose that affix detection is the key mechanism underlying morpho-orthographic segmentation (see Andrews and Davis, 1999, for a concrete proposal).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Andrews and Davis, 1999
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
Reduced efficiency in morpho-orthographic processing of pseudo-root Hebrew words allows development of coarse-grained processing without reaching non-Semitic efficiency.
“Within our dual-route approach, the likely reduced efficiency in morpho-orthographic processing of such words compared with root-derived words, would allow the development of coarse-grained processing, without actually reaching the same level of efficiency as achieved when processing non-Semitic words in the coarse-grained route.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Fine-grained optimization involves detection of frequently co-occurring letter combinations, the chunking constraint.
“Given the nature of these pre-existing representations, this optimization is thought to involve detection of frequently co-occurring letter combinations (the chunking constraint).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Affix detection requires precise letter position coding and therefore can only be performed via fine-grained orthographic processing.
“Therefore, since the detection of affixes, just like complex graphemes, requires precise letter position coding (e.g., to distinguish between the real suffix “ion” and the non-suffix ending “oin”), it can only be performed via fine-grained orthographic processing.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Whole-word form activation is constrained by top-down feedback from morpho-semantic representations.
“Activation in whole-word form representations (both orthographic and phonological, not shown in Figure 5) is further constrained by top-down feedback from morpho-semantic representations”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The priming results indicate sublexical morpho-orthographic processing that segments stem and affix, allowing activation of a stem orthographic representation.
“These results all point to some form of sublexical morpho-orthographic processing that, when presented with a fully decomposable stimulus, segments the stem and affix thereby allowing activation of an orthographic representation of the stem.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Letter transpositions disrupt processing of Semitic root morphemes as much as letter substitutions.
“Letter transpositions would therefore disrupt the processing of these root morphemes, causing as much damage as letter substitutions because of the fine-grained nature of the coding.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation
Both coarse-grained and fine-grained orthographic processing are performed by neural structures in the ventral occipital-temporal junction, specifically the left fusiform gyrus.
“Within the framework of our dual-route approach to orthographic processing, we would argue that both coarse-grained and fine-grained orthographic processing is performed by neural structures in the VOT junction, and specifically in the left fusiform gyrus (the VWFA, Cohen et al., 2002).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Cohen et al., 2002 source
- Interpretationreasoning
Coarse-grained coding would produce too many false affix detections, such as detecting the suffix "er" in "their."
“Just as is the case with complex graphemes, coarse-grained coding would give rise to too many false affix detections (binding errors), such as detecting the suffix “er” in “their.””
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation
Development of parallel fine-grained orthographic coding is particularly important for extracting suffixes or rhymes.
“The development of a parallel version of this fine-grained orthographic coding is particularly important for the extraction of suffixes or rhymes, for which the positions of the component letters are defined with respect to word endings (e.g., Treiman et al., 1995).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Treiman et al., 1995
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
Development of parallel letter processing leads to two types of location-invariant sublexical orthographic codes.
“It is the development of parallel letter processing, thought to involve some form of location-specific letter code, that then leads to the development of the two types of location-invariant, sublexical, orthographic codes that form the basis of skilled silent reading according to our dual-route approach.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Development of parallel orthographic processing enables faster access to semantic representations via a coarse-grained orthographic code.
“According to this account, the development of parallel orthographic processing will enable (1) faster access to semantic representations via the development of a coarse-grained orthographic code”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
No priming is found when the prime is formed by a stem plus a non-suffix ending.
“while again no priming is found when the prime is formed by the stem plus a non-suffix ending (cornal–corn; Longtin and Meunier, 2005, but see Morris et al., 2011, for possible limits of such a finding).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Longtin and Meunier, 2005
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Morris et al., 2011
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Masked priming studies show an advantage for semantically transparent derived primes over semantically opaque and/or pseudo-derived primes.
“Evidence in favor of this approach, and against purely morpho-orthographic accounts (Rastle and Davis, 2008), comes from masked priming studies showing an advantage for semantically transparent derived primes relative to semantically opaque and/or pseudo-derived primes (Diependaele et al., 2005, 2009; Morris et al., 2007).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Diependaele et al., 2005
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Diependaele et al., 2009
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Morris et al., 2007
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
The coarse-grained processing route provides direct access to semantics via orthographic information alone.
“This is the coarse-grained processing route that provides direct access to semantics via orthographic information alone.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation
Attention may play a different role in learning coarse-grained versus fine-grained representations.
“Furthermore, although learning of coarse-grained and fine-grained representations may well both largely involve implicit, unsupervised learning algorithms, attention might play a different role in these two cases.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationcitation
Development of parallel orthographic processing increases sensitivity to orthographic priming.
“(3) an increased sensitivity to orthographic priming (e.g., Castles et al., 2007; Acha and Perea, 2008)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Castles et al., 2007 source
- cites Acha and Perea, 2008
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
Development of parallel orthographic processing enables greater efficiency in sublexical translation of orthography to phonology via a fine-grained orthographic code.
“(2) greater efficiency in the sublexical translation of orthography to phonology via the development of a fine-grained orthographic code”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
True morphological relations still benefit from morpho-semantic facilitation obtained via coarse-grained coding.
“On the other hand, true morphological relations (e.g., farmer–farm) still benefit from morpho-semantic facilitation obtained via coarse-grained coding, such that the prime “faremr” strongly activates the whole-word orthographic representation “farmer” which connects with the whole-word orthographic representation for the word “farm” via shared morpho-semantic representations.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Morphologically simple Hebrew words of non-Semitic origin show standard letter transposition effects.
“Furthermore, Velan and Frost (2011) have recently demonstrated that morphologically simple Hebrew words of non-Semitic origin show the standard effects of letter transpositions seen with words in languages like English and French.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Velan and Frost, 2011
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationcitation
Exposure to printed words during phonological recoding enables setting up the specialized parallel orthographic processing system.
“Inspired by the self-teaching hypothesis of Share (1995), we propose that it is during this relatively slow and painstaking process of phonological recoding that exposure to printed words enables the setting-up of the specialized system for parallel orthographic processing that is hypothesized in our model of orthographic processing.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Share, 1995 source
- Interpretationreasoning
The boost in activation of the stem representation generates facilitation when the stem is the following target word.
“It is this boost in activation of the representation of the stem that generates facilitation during processing of the stem as the following target word.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Prioritizing fine-grained over coarse-grained processing is not on-line but arises per word from relative efficiency of mapping orthographic information onto semantics along each route.
“As noted above, such prioritizing is not thought to occur on-line, but arises for each individual word as a function of the relative efficiency of the process of mapping orthographic information onto semantics along each of the two routes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The two processing routes are not subject to any on-line control mechanism that could disable one or the other route.
- Interpretationcitation
Development of parallel orthographic processing increases sensitivity to morphological structure.
“and (4) an increased sensitivity to morphological structure (e.g., Colé et al., 2011).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Colé et al., 2011
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
Supervision of orthographic-phonological associations can be external or internal.
“However, this supervision can be both externally driven (teacher) and internally driven, by using the output of the letter-by-letter strategy to modify the mapping of the parallel orthographic code onto phonology.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Semantically opaque and pseudo-complex primes produce larger facilitation than stem-plus-non-suffix primes.
“and significantly larger facilitation than primes consisting of the stem plus a non-suffix ending (scandal–scan).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Rastle and Davis, 2008
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Meta-analyses show that across studies, semantically transparent primes produce significantly larger effects than opaque primes.
“Although these reports of significant effects of semantic transparency appear isolated relative to the numerous reports of non-significant differences, recent meta-analyses by Feldman et al. (2009) and Davis and Rastle (2010) show that despite the non-significance in the majority of individual studies, the effect of semantically transparent primes is indeed significantly larger than that of opaque”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Feldman et al., 2009
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Davis and Rastle, 2010
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
True derived word primes and complex pseudoword primes show similar priming effects.
“Furthermore, similar effects have also been found when comparing true derived word primes (worker–work) and complex pseudoword primes (cornity–corn)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Longtin and Meunier, 2005
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Morris et al., 2011
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationcitation
Associations between sublexical orthographic and phonological representations arise via supervised learning.
“Finally, we follow Zorzi et al., (1998) and Perry et al. (2007) in proposing that the associations established between sublexical orthographic and phonological representations (such as graphemes and phonemes) arise via supervised learning.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Zorzi et al., 1998 source
- cites Perry et al., 2007
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
Within the dual-route approach, Semitic words are processed via fine-grained orthographic processing, enabling accurate detection of tri-consonantal roots.
“Within the framework of our dual-route approach, this would imply that Semitic words are processed via fine-grained orthographic processing, which would enable the accurate detection of tri-consonantal roots.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The two processing routes are not subject to any on-line control mechanism that could disable one or the other route.
- Premisecitation
Apart from initial sight vocabulary, phonological recoding is the essential first step in reading acquisition.
“Apart from the initial acquisition of a small sight vocabulary (involving the most frequently occurring words), we agree with Share (1995) and others that phonological recoding is the essential first step in reading acquisition (e.g., Ehri, 1992).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Share, 1995 source
- cites Ehri, 1992
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Standard TL priming effects are not found in Semitic languages for true Semitic words.
“Finally, it is interesting to note the fact that standard TL priming effects are not found in Semitic languages, at least for the true Semitic words of these languages (Velan and Frost, 2009, 2011; Perea et al., 2010).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Velan and Frost, 2009
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Velan and Frost, 2011
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Perea et al., 2010
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationcitation
Development of parallel orthographic processing reduces word length effects.
“Among the empirical consequences of the development of parallel orthographic processing are: (1) a reduction in the effects of word length (e.g., Aghababian and Nazir, 2000; Bijeljac-Babic et al., 2004; Acha and Perea, 2008)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Aghababian and Nazir, 2000
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Bijeljac-Babic et al., 2004
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Acha and Perea, 2008
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
The distinction between Semitic and Indo-European reading is quantitative rather than qualitative.
“This is therefore more a quantitative than a qualitative distinction”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Unsupervised learning algorithms such as Self-Organizing Maps and Adaptive Resonance Theory provide mechanisms for orthographic chunking from parallel letter input.
“Unsupervised learning algorithms, such as implemented in Self-Organizing Maps (e.g., Kohonen, 1982; Dufau et al., 2010) or Adaptive Resonance Theory (e.g., Grossberg, 1987; Glotin et al., 2010), provide specific mechanisms for performing orthographic chunking on the basis of a parallel letter input.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked - Interpretationreasoning
Semitic root-derived words are predominantly processed via the fine-grained route.
“Semitic root-derived words, on the other hand, would be predominantly processed via the fine-grained route.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The nature of the two sublexical codes is determined by constraints from optimizing letter-to-meaning mapping during reading.
“The nature of the two types of sublexical location-invariant orthographic codes that are hypothesized in our approach, is thought to be determined by the constraints imposed by the general goal of optimizing the mapping of letters onto meaning while learning to read.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The nature of the two sublexical location-invariant orthographic codes is determined by constraints from the general goal of optimizing the mapping of letters onto meaning during reading acquisition.
- Premisecitation
Morphology influences visual word recognition through fast and automatic morpho-orthographic segmentation.
“On the basis of these results, it is commonly agreed that morphology influences visual word recognition through fast and automatic morpho-orthographic segmentation (see Rastle and Davis, 2008, for a review of the findings).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Rastle and Davis, 2008
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Hebrew words with an existing verbal pattern and a non-productive or pseudo-root produce priming effects intermediate between root-derived and morphologically simple non-Semitic words.
“Velan and Frost (2011) reported the results of an interesting intermediate case of Hebrew words that have an existing verbal pattern combined with a non-productive or pseudo-root. These words were found to produce a pattern of priming effects lying in between the root-derived words and the morphologically simple non-Semitic words.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Velan and Frost, 2011
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
The mechanism for coarse-grained letter-position coding and the mechanism for fine-grained affix detection are not the same.
“In sum, the key idea behind our dual-route proposal when applied to morphological processing, is that the mechanism that learns that the presence of the letter F somewhere before the letter R is a good indication that the whole-word being processed is “farmer” or “farm,” is not the same mechanism that learns that there is an E just before a final R, and that this combination of letters has a”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisereasoning
Frequently co-occurring groups of letters often represent the orthographic equivalent of phonemes and morphemes.
“Frequently co-occurring groups of letters often represent the orthographic equivalent of phonemes and morphemes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Attention is a critical factor in learning dependencies among elements.
“Recent research suggests that attention might be a critical factor in learning dependencies among elements (e.g., Pacton and Perruchet, 2008; see Le Pelley, 2010, for a review of the evidence).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Pacton and Perruchet, 2008 source
- cites Le Pelley, 2010
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationnone given
Coarse-grained orthographic processing feeds activation to whole-word orthographic representations independently of morphological structure.
“At the same time, coarse-grained orthographic processing also feeds forward activation to whole-word orthographic representations, but independently of the morphological structure of the stimulus.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The fine-grained processing route provides access to semantics via phonological and morphological representations.
“This is the fine-grained processing route that provides access to semantics via phonological and morphological representations.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given
Morpho-orthographic segmentation is achieved via fine-grained orthographic processing, which feeds activation to compatible whole-word orthographic representations.
“Morpho-orthographic segmentation is achieved via fine-grained orthographic processing, which then feeds activation forward to compatible whole-word orthographic representations.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The utility of a ventral-dorsal distinction in describing projections is called into question because phonological processing is associated with both frontal and dorsal projections.
“Given that phonological processing is associated with both projections from fusiform to frontal regions (pars opercularis) and projections from fusiform to dorsal regions, the utility of a ventral–dorsal distinction in describing these projections is called into question.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The mechanisms for sublexical conversion of print to sound in skilled reading are not the same as the early serial mechanisms used by beginning readers.
“In line with this proposition, and as argued in our account of reading development (see above), the mechanisms involved in sublexical conversion of print to sound in skilled reading are thought not to be the same as the very early serial mechanisms used by beginning readers.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Increased sensitivity to orthographic structure could reflect increases in the size of both coarse-grained and fine-grained orthographic representations.
“The increased sensitivity to orthographic structure could reflect both an increase in the size of coarse-grained orthographic representations (e.g., open n-grams, with increasing n), and the increase in size of fine-grained orthographic representations (e.g., graphemes and morphemes of increasing length).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 35
- May combine two claims. 28
- The quote only partly states this claim. 2
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationOpen-bigram coding represents ordered pairs of letters independently of their contiguity.
“In Grainger and van Heuven's scheme, open-bigrams code for the presence of ordered pairs of letters independently of their contiguity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checked- cites Mozer (1987)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Whitney (2001) source
Section 2.4, “Bigram and Word Levels,” says bigram nodes recognize ordered pairs of letters and can be activated by noncontiguous letters. That supports the description of open-bigram coding, but the passage describes Whitney’s SERIOL framework, not Grainger and van Heuven’s scheme; our copy does not establish that attribution. (LLM, conf=0.83)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites Grainger and van Heuven (2003)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningOpen-bigram coding is only one possible implementation; replacing it with another scheme would not harm the approach if the new mechanism is flexible and maximizes diagnostic information under visibility constraints.
“Replacing this mechanism with an alternative coding scheme (e.g., Gomez et al., 2008) would not be detrimental to our approach, as long as the new mechanism exhibits the key properties of flexibility, and maximizing the use of diagnostic information given constraints in letter visibility.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Gomez et al., 2008 source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationPseudo-homophones are harder to reject as non-words in lexical decision, generate more semantic categorization errors, and are more effective primes than matched orthographic controls.
“These stimuli are harder to reject as non-words in a lexical decision task (e.g., Goswami et al., 2001; Ziegler et al., 2001), generate more semantic categorization errors (e.g., Van Orden, 1987), and are more effective primes compared with carefully matched orthographic controls”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checked- cites Goswami et al., 2001
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Ziegler et al., 2001
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Van Orden, 1987 source
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationcitationThe dual-route architecture may emerge because visual word recognition mixes a spatial world of visual objects and a temporal world of spoken language.
“As suggested by Grainger and Holcomb (2009), it is possible that this dual-route architecture emerges from the fact that visual word recognition is a mixture of two worlds: one whose main dimension is space – the world of visual objects; and the other whose main dimension is time – the world of spoken language.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Grainger and Holcomb (2009) source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationOrthographic processing proceeds in a posterior-anterior sweep through left fusiform gyrus, with increased location-invariance and increased sensitivity to orthographic structure.
“The evidence at present suggests that orthographic processing proceeds in a posterior–anterior sweep through left fusiform gyrus, with an increase in location-invariance (Dehaene et al., 2004) accompanied by increased sensitivity to orthographic structure (Vinckier et al., 2007).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites Dehaene et al., 2004
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Vinckier et al., 2007 source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationMorpho-semantic representations are supralexical and impose a morphological organization on whole-word form representations.
“As shown in Figure 5, morpho-semantic representations are supralexical representations that impose a morphological organization on whole-word form representations (Grainger et al., 1991; Giraudo and Grainger, 2001).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites Grainger et al., 1991
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Giraudo and Grainger, 2001 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone givenIn the non-lexical route, sublexical orthographic information is first converted into a sublexical phonological code before contacting phonological output units, whole-word phonological representations, and semantics.
“Along the so-called indirect, non-lexical route, sublexical orthographic information is first transformed into a sublexical phonological code before making contact with phonological output units, whole-word phonological representations, and semantics.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe diagnosticity and chunking constraints produce two distinct kinds of prelexical orthographic code, coarse-grained and fine-grained, which correspond to the two routes of a dual-route architecture.
“These two constraints give rise to two different kinds of prelexical orthographic code, a coarse-grained and a fine-grained code, associated with the two routes of a dual-route architecture.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisereasoningIn dual-route models of reading, this single sublexical orthographic code feeds both whole-word orthographic representations and sublexical phonological representations.
“In dual-route models of reading, this unique sublexical orthographic code feeds activation forward to both whole-word orthographic representations (direct route) and sublexical phonological representations (indirect route).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningIdentifying a unique orthographic word requires knowing where a letter is within the word, not where it is on the retina.
“However, identifying a unique orthographic word requires knowledge about where a given letter is in the word, not on the retina.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenDuring reading acquisition, optimizing the mapping from print to meaning involves selecting letter combinations that are most informative about word identity (the diagnosticity constraint).
“On the one hand, optimization is hypothesized to involve selecting combinations of letters that are the most informative with respect to word identity (diagnosticity constraint)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationcitationThese two orthographic codes are hypothesized to have developed because of the constraints that shape orthographic representations during reading acquisition.
“These two types of orthographic codes are hypothesized to have developed as a result of the nature of the constraints that fashion the formation of orthographic representations during reading acquisition”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Grainger and Dufau, 2011
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationThe traditional dual-route model of reading aloud distinguishes a lexical route and a non-lexical route for transforming print to sound.
“The starting point of the present endeavor is the traditional dual-route model of reading aloud, that distinguishes between a lexical route and a non-lexical route for transforming print to sound”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Ellis and Young, 1988
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Coltheart et al., 1993, 2001
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Zorzi, 2010 source
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisereasoningThe hard problem of orthographic processing is transforming location-specific retinotopic visual information into a location-invariant word-centered orthographic code.
“These models therefore avoid the hard problem of orthographic processing, that is, the transformation of location-specific retinotopic visual information into a location-invariant word-centered orthographic code.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe fine-grained route is sensitive to the exact order of letters and to their position relative to word beginnings and endings.
“Processing along the fined-grained route, on the other hand, is sensitive to the precise ordering of letters, as well as to position with respect to word beginnings and endings.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe coarse-grained route supports fast access to semantics by using minimal letter subsets that maximize word-identity information, and it codes approximate within-word letter position without requiring letter contiguity.
“Processing along the coarse-grained route optimizes fast access to semantics by using minimal subsets of letters that maximize information with respect to word identity, while coding for approximate within-word letter position independently of letter contiguity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe BIAM is a localist implementation of the triangle approach to visual word recognition, with direct and indirect (via phonology) routes from orthography to semantics.
“The BIAM can be seen as a localist implementation of the generic division of labor or “triangle” approach to visual word recognition, in which there are two routes from orthography to semantics – a direct route and an indirect route via phonology”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone givenIn the lexical route, sublexical orthographic information contacts whole-word orthographic representations, which then provide access to whole-word phonology and higher-level semantics.
“The lexical route is often referred to as the direct route, whereby sublexical orthographic information makes direct contact with whole-word orthographic representations, which then provide access to whole-word phonology on the one hand, and higher-level semantic information on the other.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationreasoningThe multiple-route model in Figure 4 extends the BIAM by incorporating the distinction between two types of sublexical orthographic code.
“Figure 4 describes a multiple-route model of printed word recognition that is basically an extension of the BIAM that incorporates the distinction drawn between two types of sublexical orthographic code.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationreasoningThis allows orthographic information to contact pre-existing sublexical phonological and morphological representations.
“This allows orthographic information to make contact with pre-existing sublexical phonological and morphological representations.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationLike the BIAM, the multiple-route model resembles dual-route models of reading aloud and especially the CDP+ model.
“Like the BIAM, our multiple-route model of word recognition has many similarities with dual-route models of reading aloud (Coltheart et al., 2001) and particularly the CDP+ model (Perry et al., 2007, 2010).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Coltheart et al., 2001 source
- cites Perry et al., 2007, 2010
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationAcha and Perea found standard transposed-letter priming for transposed-letter word primes but no priming for transposed-letter pseudo-homophone primes, as predicted.
“They found the standard TL priming effect for TL word primes, but no priming effect for TL pseudo-homophone primes, as predicted by our dual-route approach.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Acha and Perea (2010)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationFrankish and colleagues found that illegal non-words were more readily misperceived as the baseword, took longer to reject in lexical decision, and were more effective primes.
“Frankish and colleagues found that the illegal non-words were more readily misperceived as the corresponding baseword in a perceptual identification task, took longer to reject as a non-word in the lexical decision task (Frankish and Turner, 2007), and were more effective primes for the corresponding baseword targets in a masked priming experiment (Frankish and Barnes, 2008).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Frankish and Turner, 2007
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Frankish and Barnes, 2008 source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationPhonological influences on visual word recognition are fast acting but require more processing than purely orthographic effects.
“Furthermore, in line with the architecture of the BIAM and its extension in the form of the multiple-route model shown in Figure 4, we know that phonological influences on visual word recognition are fast acting (Braun et al., 2009), but nevertheless require more processing than that required to obtain purely orthographic effects.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Braun et al., 2009
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
The quote only partly states this claim.
InterpretationreasoningA dual-route approach follows naturally from this distinction because learning the two types of code likely involves fundamentally different mechanisms.
“A dual-route approach follows naturally from this distinction to the extent that fundamentally different mechanisms are likely to be involved in learning these two types of code.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisenone givenTransposing two letters of 'storm' can generate either a regular non-word such as 'strom' or an irregular non-word such as 'sotrm'.
“Transposing two letters of the baseword “storm,” for example, can generate either an orthostatically and phonotactically regular non-word such as “strom” or an orthostatically and phonotactically irregular non-word such as “sotrm.””
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningPurely orthographic constraints need to be supplemented with phonological constraints to optimize sublexical print-to-sound conversion.
“Here we imply that purely orthographic constraints need to be supplemented with phonological constraints in order to optimize the sublexical conversion of print-to-sound.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationreasoningThe fine-grained orthographic processing route is not limited to processing grapheme representations.
“However, in the present theoretical approach, the fine-grained orthographic processing route is not limited to the case of processing grapheme representations.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationSlot-coding with both beginning and end anchor points, as proposed by Jacobs et al., is one solution for fine-grained letter position coding.
“One solution would be to adopt slot-coding with both beginning and end anchor points, such as proposed by Jacobs et al. (1998), a variant of which has been adopted in recent work on letter position coding in written language production”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Jacobs et al. (1998)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningUnder the hypothesis that phonemes are good candidates for sublexical phonological representations, single-letter representations are required to contact phonemes written with a single letter.
“Furthermore, under the hypothesis that phonemes are a good candidate for such sublexical phonological representations, single-letter representations are required in order to make contact with the numerous phonemes that are written with a single letter.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: Phonemes are a good candidate for sublexical phonological representations.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningOpen-bigram coding naturally explains flexible orthographic processing and, with letter visibility and informativity, accounts for variations in orthographic priming by overlap position and letter type.
“Not only does open-bigram coding provide a natural explanation for these empirical demonstrations of flexible orthographic processing, but when combined with the constraints of letter visibility and informativity it can also account for more subtle variations in orthographic priming effects as a function of the position of orthographic overlap and the precise letters involved”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Grainger, 2008
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationFischer-Baum et al. showed that this coding scheme provided a superior account of spelling errors in two dysgraphic persons compared with alternative letter position coding schemes.
“Fischer-Baum et al. (2010) showed that this type of coding scheme provided a superior account of the patterns of spelling errors in two dysgraphic persons, compared with alternative letter position coding schemes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Fischer-Baum et al. (2010) source
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningTwo types of constraints affect processing along the two routes, and both are driven by the frequency with which letter combinations occur in printed words.
“The dual-route approach acknowledges that two different types of constraints affect processing along the two routes. Both types of constraints are driven by the frequency with which different combinations of letters occur in printed words.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Interpretationnone givenThe dual-route approach can be integrated within the BIAM framework.
“Our dual-route approach to orthographic processing can be easily integrated within the more general framework of a BIAM of visual word recognition.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenThese constraints push the system to develop diagnostic letter combinations for word identity and clusters of highly co-occurring letters of functional significance.
“It is hypothesized that these constraints push the system to develop diagnostic features (letter combinations) for word identity on the one hand, and clusters of highly co-occurring letters of functional significance, on the other.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe model explicitly describes print-to-meaning processing via orthographic representations alone and distinguishes location-specific from location-invariant codes.
“The model proposed in Figure 4 provides a more explicit description of the processing involved in getting from print to meaning via orthographic representations alone, and draws a key distinction between location-specific and location-invariant (word-centered) orthographic codes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe two routes use frequency of occurrence in opposite ways and perform fundamentally different types of orthographic processing.
“Fundamentally different types of orthographic processing are performed by the two routes of our dual-route approach, since they are geared to use frequency of occurrence in diametrically opposite ways.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningSkilled readers might capitalize on this by using spatial structure to map orthography to semantics and temporal structure to map orthography to phonology.
“Skilled readers might therefore have learned to capitalize on this particularity, using structure in space in order to optimize the mapping of an orthographic form onto semantics, and using structure in time in order to optimize the mapping of an orthographic form onto phonology.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThis fast guess is not foolproof but provides rapid bottom-up activation of whole-word representations that can combine with contextual constraints.
“This is not intended to be a foolproof means of knowing what word is present, but a means to provide rapid bottom-up activation of whole-word representations that can be combined with contextual constraints in order to home-in on the correct word meaning during reading comprehension.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenThe same mechanism is responsible for extracting other highly recurring contiguous letter combinations, such as affixes.
“It is also thought to be the mechanism responsible for extracting other types of highly recurring contiguous letter combinations, such as affixes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationMorphological priming is larger than both form priming and semantic priming.
“Critically, morphological priming is larger than both form priming (scandal–scan) and semantic priming (giraffe–horse; see Diependaele et al., 2011 for review).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Diependaele et al., 2011
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted), S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenThe best way to optimize performance is to adapt processing to constraints imposed by variations in letter visibility and in the amount of information carried by different letter combinations.
“Given variations in visibility across letters in a string, the key hypothesis here is that the best way to optimize performance is to adapt processing to the constraints imposed by variations in letter visibility and variations in the amount of information carried by different letter combinations.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationGraphemes activate corresponding phonemes, which then activate the appropriate whole-word phonological representation and semantic representations.
“These graphemes then activate the corresponding phonemes, which in turn lead to activation of the appropriate whole-word phonological representation and the corresponding semantic representations”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Perry et al., 2007 source
The quote only partly states this claim.
PremisecitationReading morphologically complex words involves sublexical segmentation into constituent morphemes.
“There is growing evidence that part of the process of reading morphologically complex words involves the sublexical segmentation of the word into its constituent morphemes (e.g., work + er).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: A large proportion of words encountered in daily reading are morphologically complex, about 75% in French and 85% in English.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningOptimization of identification processes generally involves extracting diagnostic information and simplifying processing via data compression.
“Therefore, a more general answer to the above question would be that optimization of identification processes (for any kind of object) involves extraction of diagnostic information on the one hand, and a simplification of processing via data compression on the other”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationFischer-Baum et al. proposed 'both ends' letter position coding, in which each letter is represented twice, relative to word beginning and relative to word end.
“Fischer-Baum et al. (2010) propose that letter position is coded both from the beginning to the end, and from the end to the beginning of the string (a scheme referred to as “both ends” letter position coding).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Fischer-Baum et al. (2010) source
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationcitationPhonological constraints could operate at the level of individual phonemes and phonological syllables, as in CDP++.
“These phonological constraints could operate at the level of individual phonemes and phonological syllables, as in CDP++ (Perry et al., 2010).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Perry et al., 2010 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted), S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningThe fine-grained route is dedicated to precisely specifying within-string positions of letter identities to facilitate chunking of frequently co-occurring contiguous letter combinations, such as complex graphemes and small morphemes.
“Here, we hypothesize that this route is more generally dedicated to precisely specifying the within-string positions of letter identities in order to facilitate the chunking of frequently co-occurring contiguous4 letter combinations, such as complex graphemes (e.g., TH, CH, OO) and small morphemes (i.e., affixes such as RE, ED, ER, ING).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted).
InterpretationreasoningMorpho-orthographic segmentation occurs along the fine-grained orthographic processing route of the dual-route model.
“Here we hypothesize that such morpho-orthographic segmentation occurs along the fine-grained orthographic processing route of our model.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningNon-Semitic Hebrew words are processed like English and French words, with robustness to TL manipulations arising from coarse-grained processing.
“Within our dual-route approach, these non-Semitic Hebrew words would be processed just like English and French words, with robustness to TL manipulations arising from involvement of the coarse-grained processing route.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningTwo factors could help focus attention on contiguous letter dependencies: initial supervised learning and pre-existing phonological or morphological representations.
“In the specific case of learning to read words, two factors could help focus attention on contiguous dependencies between letters. One would be an initial phase of supervised learning, whereby the beginning reader is told that a given complex grapheme corresponds to a particular phoneme. The other is the presence of pre-existing phonological and/or morphological representations that correspond to”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationMorphological influences reflect both morpho-orthographic and morpho-semantic processing.
“According to the account of morphological processing proposed by Diependaele et al. (2005, 2009; see also Morris et al., 2011), such morphological influences not only reflect morpho-orthographic processing, but also morpho-semantic processing.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenA precise word-centered letter-position coding scheme enables chunking of frequently co-occurring contiguous letter combinations independently of eye fixation location.
“Here it is hypothesized that a precise word-centered letter-position coding scheme enables the chunking of frequently co-occurring contiguous letter combinations, such as multi-letter graphemes and affixes, independently of eye fixation location in the word.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningBecause morpho-orthographic segmentation is the only source of priming for pseudo-derived relations, a TL manipulation eliminates priming in that condition.
“Since this is hypothesized to the only source of priming for pseudo-derived relations (e.g., corner–corn), a TL manipulation eliminates priming in this condition.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationcitationCoarse-grained optimization involves developing letter combination detectors that best constrain word identity, the diagnosticity constraint.
“Here, optimization is thought to involve the development of letter combination detectors that best constrain word identity (the diagnosticity constraint), in the same way that parts of objects act as clues to object identity in certain theoretical approaches to visual object recognition (e.g., Ullman et al., 2002).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Ullman et al., 2002 source
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationNon-adjacent contingencies are harder to learn than adjacent ones because attention is easier to focus on contiguous events.
“According to Pacton and Perruchet (2008), the reason why non-adjacent contingencies are typically harder to learn than adjacent contingencies is because it is easier to focus attention on contiguous events than non-contiguous events.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Pacton and Perruchet, 2008 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted).
InterpretationcitationDevelopment of parallel letter identification causes a shift from sequential letter encoding to parallel mapping onto higher-level orthographic representations such as graphemes and affixes, retaining precision.
“The development of parallel letter identification is therefore hypothesized to cause a shift from a strictly sequential letter encoding (that outputs an ordered set of phonemes) to a more parallel mapping of letters onto higher-level orthographic representations such as graphemes and affixes, that retains the same level of precision as the strictly sequential mechanism (see Alario et al., 2007).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Alario et al., 2007 source
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataLetter transpositions selectively interfere with fine-grained orthographic processing and therefore selectively perturb sublexical morpho-orthographic segmentation.
“According to our dual-route model, letter transpositions selectively interfere with fine-grained orthographic processing, and therefore selectively perturb sublexical morpho-orthographic segmentation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenThe two types of orthographic coding in the model emerge from specific constraints operating during reading acquisition.
“This is an essential extension of the approach, given that the two types of orthographic coding postulated in our model are thought to emerge as the result of specific constraints operating during reading acquisition.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The nature of the two sublexical location-invariant orthographic codes is determined by constraints from the general goal of optimizing the mapping of letters onto meaning during reading acquisition.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Interpretationnone givenThe dual-route approach posits two fundamentally different types of sublexical, word-centered orthographic representations.
“We have described a dual-route approach to orthographic processing that posits the existence of two fundamentally different types of sublexical, word-centered, orthographic representations.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
The authors state this as an assumption.
Pseudo-homophone priming effects are subtended by sublexical phonology.
“under the assumption that pseudo-homophone priming effects are subtended by sublexical phonology (see Rastle and Brysbaert, 2006, for review)”
The paper relies on this without support.
During reading, the eyes fixate most words, usually once, and information uptake from a fixated word depends on fixation position.
“During reading, the eyes fixate the majority of words in the text, mostly just once, and information uptake from the fixated word is a function of fixation position in the word.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
Phonemes are a good candidate for sublexical phonological representations.
“under the hypothesis that phonemes are a good candidate for such sublexical phonological representations”
The paper relies on this without support.
A large proportion of words encountered in daily reading are morphologically complex, about 75% in French and 85% in English.
“A large number of the words we read every day are morphologically complex (approximately 75% in French and 85% in English).”
The paper relies on this without support.
The two processing routes are not subject to any on-line control mechanism that could disable one or the other route.
“given that we do not expect the two processing routes to be subject to any kind of on-line control mechanism that could disable one or the other processing route.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The beginning reader initially uses a serial letter-by-letter reading strategy because parallel letter identification is not yet established.
“Initially, this will involve a serial letter-by-letter reading strategy, since the mechanism for parallel letter identification is not yet established.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The nature of the two sublexical location-invariant orthographic codes is determined by constraints from the general goal of optimizing the mapping of letters onto meaning during reading acquisition.
“The nature of the two types of sublexical location-invariant orthographic codes that are hypothesized in our approach, is thought to be determined by the constraints imposed by the general goal of optimizing the mapping of letters onto meaning while learning to read.”
Cites
Self-organized formation of topologically correct feature maps
Kohonen, T. (1982) · Biological Cybernetics · doi:10.1007/bf00337288 · Cited by 9,529 · see citing works
McClelland, J. L., & Rumelhart, D. E. (1981) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.88.5.375 · Cited by 4,889 · see citing works
A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming.
Seidenberg, M. S., & McClelland, J. L. (1989) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.96.4.523 · Cited by 3,909 · see citing works
DRC: A dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud.
Coltheart, M., Rastle, K., Perry, C., Langdon, R., & Ziegler, J. (2001) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.108.1.204 · Cited by 3,178 · see citing works
Self-citationZiegler, J. C., & Goswami, U. (2005) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.131.1.3 · Cited by 2,871 · see citing works
Self-citationUnderstanding normal and impaired word reading: Computational principles in quasi-regular domains.
Plaut, D. C., McClelland, J. L., Seidenberg, M. S., & Patterson, K. (1996) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.103.1.56 · Cited by 2,698 · see citing works
Phonological recoding and self-teaching: sine qua non of reading acquisition
Share, D. L. (1995) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/0010-0277(94)00645-2 · Cited by 2,352 · see citing works
Models of reading aloud: Dual-route and parallel-distributed-processing approaches.
Coltheart, M., Curtis, B., Atkins, P., & Haller, M. (1993) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.100.4.589 · Cited by 1,735 · see citing works
Rumelhart, D. E., & McClelland, J. L. (1982) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.89.1.60 · Cited by 1,530 · see citing works
Top-down facilitation of visual recognition
Bar, M., Kassam, K. S., Ghuman, A. S., Boshyan, J., Schmid, A. M., Dale, A. M., Hämäläinen, M. S., Marinkovic, K., Schacter, D. L., Rosen, B. R., et al. (2006) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0507062103 · Cited by 1,489 · see citing works
Competitive learning: From interactive activation to adaptive resonance
Grossberg, S. (1987) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/j.1551-6708.1987.tb00862.x · Cited by 1,471 · see citing works
Language‐specific tuning of visual cortex? Functional properties of the Visual Word Form Area
Cohen, L., Lehéricy, S., Chochon, F., Lemer, C., Rivaud, S., & Dehaene, S. (2002) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awf094 · Cited by 1,254 · cited 2× · see citing works
“…gyrus and the angular gyrus, are thought to be involved in the mapping of orthography to phonology (e.g., Booth et al., 2003; Wilson et al., 2011), whereas orthographic processing would be performed by brain structures in ventral occipital–temporal (VOT) regions (e.g., Cohen et al., 2002).”
BackgroundHuman Cognitive Neuropsychology
Ellis, A. W., & Young, A. W. (2013) · Psychology Press eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203727041 · Cited by 1,176 · see citing works
The neural code for written words: a proposal
Dehaene, S., Cohen, L., Sigman, M., & Vinckier, F. (2005) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2005.05.004 · Cited by 1,151 · see citing works
Evaluation of the dual route theory of reading: a metanalysis of 35 neuroimaging studies
Jobard, G., Crivello, F., & Tzourio-Mazoyer, N. (2003) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/s1053-8119(03)00343-4 · Cited by 973 · see citing works
Orthographic processing in visual word recognition: A multiple read-out model.
Grainger, J., & Jacobs, A. M. (1996) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.103.3.518 · Cited by 947 · see citing works
Self-citationVariability and Detection of Invariant Structure
Gómez, R. (2002) · Psychology Science · doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00476 · Cited by 898 · see citing works
A ROWS is a ROSE: Spelling, sound, and reading
van Orden, G. C. (1987) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/bf03197716 · Cited by 867 · cited 6× · see citing works
“Van Orden, G. C. (1987).”
ResultInfluentialVinckier, F., Dehaene, S., Jobert, A., Dubus, J. P., Sigman, M., & Cohen, L. (2007) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2007.05.031 · Cited by 717 · see citing works
Visual features of intermediate complexity and their use in classification
Ullman, S., Vidal-Naquet, M., & Sali, E. (2002) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn870 · Cited by 600 · see citing works
Reconceptualizing the Development of Sight Word Reading and Its Relationship to Recoding
Ehri, L. C. (2017) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781351236904-5 · Cited by 564 · see citing works
The special role of rimes in the description, use, and acquisition of English orthography.
Treiman, R., Mullennix, J., Bijeljac-Babic, R., & Richmond-Welty, E. D. (1995) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General · doi:10.1037/0096-3445.124.2.107 · Cited by 556 · see citing works
The special role of rimes in the description, use, and acquisition of English orthography.
Rebecca Treiman, A., Mullennix, J. W., Bijeljac-Babic, R., & Richmond-Welty, E. D. (1995) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037//0096-3445.124.2.107 · Cited by 556 · see citing works
Perry, C., Ziegler, J. C., & Zorzi, M. (2007) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.114.2.273 · Cited by 547 · see citing works
Self-citationvon der Malsburg, C. (1999) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(00)80825-9 · Cited by 501 · see citing works
Morphological decomposition based on the analysis of orthography
Rastle, K., & Davis, M. H. (2008) · Language and Cognitive Processes · doi:10.1080/01690960802069730 · Cited by 494 · see citing works
The spatial coding model of visual word identification.
Davis, C. J. (2010) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/a0019738 · Cited by 493 · see citing works
Watching the Word Go by: On the Time‐course of Component Processes in Visual Word Recognition
Grainger, J., & Holcomb, P. J. (2009) · Language and Linguistics Compass · doi:10.1111/j.1749-818x.2008.00121.x · Cited by 460 · see citing works
Self-citationWhitney, C. (2001) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/bf03196158 · Cited by 447 · see citing works
The overlap model: A model of letter position coding.
Gomez, P., Ratcliff, R., & Perea, M. (2008) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/a0012667 · Cited by 405 · see citing works
Can CANISO activate CASINO? Transposed-letter similarity effects with nonadjacent letter positions
Perea, M., & Lupker, S. J. (2004) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/j.jml.2004.05.005 · Cited by 394 · see citing works
Letter Binding and Invariant Recognition of Masked Words: Behavioral and Neuroimaging Evidence
Dehaene, S., Jobert, A., Naccache, L., Ciuciu, P., Poline, J.-B., Le Bihan, D., & Cohen, L. (2004) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00674.x · Cited by 356 · see citing works
Perfetti, C. A., & Bell, L. (1991) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/0749-596x(91)90017-e · Cited by 348 · see citing works
Two routes or one in reading aloud? A connectionist dual-process model.
Zorzi, M., Houghton, G., & Butterworth, B. (1998) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance · doi:10.1037/0096-1523.24.4.1131 · Cited by 339 · see citing works
Cracking the orthographic code: An introduction
Jonathan Grainger, B. (2008) · Language and Cognitive Processes · doi:10.1080/01690960701578013 · Cited by 323 · see citing works
Self-citationModels of visual word recognition: Sampling the state of the art.
Jacobs, A. M., & Grainger, J. (1994) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance · doi:10.1037/0096-1523.20.6.1311 · Cited by 319 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Much of the success of this general approach lies in the application of the principle of nested incremental modeling (Jacobs and Grainger, 1994; Grainger and Jacobs, 1996; Perry et al., 2007).”
BackgroundModeling letter position coding in printed word perception
Jonathan Grainger, B., & van Heuven, W. J. B. (2004) · Radboud Repository (Radboud University) · Cited by 308 · see citing works
Self-citationReading normal and degraded words: Contribution of the dorsal and ventral visual pathways.
Cohen, L., Dehaene, S., Vinckier, F., Jobert, A., & Montavont, A. (2008) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.11.036 · Cited by 303 · see citing works
Perry, C., Ziegler, J. C., & Zorzi, M. (2010) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2010.04.001 · Cited by 294 · see citing works
Self-citationLetter position coding in printed word perception: Effects of repeated and transposed letters
Schoonbaert, S., & Jonathan Grainger, B. (2004) · Language and Cognitive Processes · doi:10.1080/01690960344000198 · Cited by 283 · see citing works
Self-citationSprenger-Charolles, L., Siegel, L. S., Béchennec, D., & Serniclaes, W. (2003) · Journal of Experimental Child Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0022-0965(03)00024-9 · Cited by 277 · see citing works
Spatial representation of words in the brain implied by studies of a unilateral neglect patient
Caramazza, A., & Hillis, A. E. (1990) · Nature · doi:10.1038/346267a0 · Cited by 272 · see citing works
Does the huamn mnid raed wrods as a wlohe?
Jonathan Grainger, B., & Whitney, C. (2003) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2003.11.006 · Cited by 265 · see citing works
Self-citationThe Time Course of Orthographic and Phonological Code Activation
Jonathan Grainger, B., Kiyonaga, K., & Holcomb, P. J. (2006) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01821.x · Cited by 253 · see citing works
Self-citationLukatela, G., & Turvey, M. T. (1994) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037//0096-3445.123.4.331 · Cited by 250 · see citing works
Morphological decomposition in early visual word processing☆
(2005) · doi:10.1016/j.jml.2005.02.008 · Cited by 242 · see citing works
Feldman, L., O’Connor, P. A., & Martín, F. M. D. P. (2009) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/pbr.16.4.684 · Cited by 237 · see citing works
Masked phonological priming effects in English: Are they real? Do they matter?
Rastle, K., & Brysbaert, M. (2006) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2006.01.002 · Cited by 234 · see citing works
Masked morphological priming in visual word recognition
Jonathan Grainger, B., Colé, P., & Seguí, J. (1991) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/0749-596x(91)90042-i · Cited by 231 · see citing works
Self-citationPhonology and Orthography in Visual Word Recognition: Effects of Masked Homophone Primes
Jonathan Grainger, B., & Ferrand, L. (1994) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1006/jmla.1994.1011 · Cited by 223 · see citing works
Self-citationDissociating Reading Processes on the Basis of Neuronal Interactions
Mechelli, A., Crinion, J., de long, S., Friston, K. J., Ralph, M. A. L., Patterson, K. E., McClelland, J. L., & Price, C. J. (2005) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/089892905774589190 · Cited by 214 · see citing works
The Neurobiological Basis of Skilled and Impaired Reading: Recent Findings and New Directions
Sandak, R., Mencl, W. E., Frost, S. J., & Pugh, K. R. (2004) · Scientific Studies of Reading · doi:10.1207/s1532799xssr0803_6 · Cited by 212 · see citing works
Effects of Orthography are Independent of Phonology in Masked form Priming
Ferrand, L., & Grainger, J. (1994) · The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A · doi:10.1080/14640749408401116 · Cited by 210 · see citing works
Lexical Retrieval and Selection Processes: Effects of Transposed-Letter Confusability
Andrews, S. (1996) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1006/jmla.1996.0040 · Cited by 200 · see citing works
Letter position information and printed word perception: The relative-position priming constraint.
Jonathan Grainger, B., Granier, J.-P., Farioli, F., Assche, E. V., & van Heuven, W. J. B. (2006) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance · doi:10.1037/0096-1523.32.4.865 · Cited by 196 · see citing works
Self-citationLinguistic Constraints on Statistical Computations
Bonatti, L., Peña, M., Nespor, M., & Mehler, J. (2005) · Psychology Science · doi:10.1111/j.0956-7976.2005.01556.x · Cited by 193 · see citing works
Developing Normal Reading Skills: Aspects of the Visual Processes Underlying Word Recognition
Aghababian, V., & Nazir, T. A. (2000) · Journal of Experimental Child Psychology · doi:10.1006/jecp.1999.2540 · Cited by 190 · see citing works
Letter and order information in lexical access
Chambers, S. M. (1979) · Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior · doi:10.1016/s0022-5371(79)90136-1 · Cited by 181 · see citing works
Goswami, U., Ziegler, J. C., Dalton, L. J., & Schneider, W. (2001) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1006/jmla.2001.2790 · Cited by 167 · see citing works
Self-citationTracking the acquisition of orthographic skills in developing readers: Masked priming effects
Castles, A., Davis, C., Cavalot, P., & Forster, K. (2007) · Journal of Experimental Child Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2007.01.006 · Cited by 163 · see citing works
Priming complex words: Evidence for supralexical representation of morphology
Giraudo, H., & Grainger, J. (2001) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/bf03196148 · Cited by 157 · see citing works
Self-citationVelan, H., & Frost, R. (2010) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2010.11.013 · Cited by 156 · see citing works
Semantic transparency and masked morphological priming: an ERP investigation.
Morris, J., Frank, T., Grainger, J., & Holcomb, P. (2007) · Psychophysiology · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.2007.00538.x · Cited by 153 · see citing works
Self-citationEvidence for Early Morphological Decomposition in Visual Word Recognition
Solomyak, O., & Marantz, A. (2010) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn.2009.21296 · Cited by 148 · see citing works
Criterion bias and search sequence bias in word recognition
O’Connor, R. E., & Forster, K. I. (1981) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/bf03196953 · Cited by 147 · see citing works
Relation between brain activation and lexical performance
Booth, J. R., Burman, D. D., Meyer, J. R., Gitelman, D. R., Parrish, T. B., & Mesulam, M. M. (2003) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.10111 · Cited by 147 · see citing works
Diependaele, K., Sandra, D., & Grainger, J. (2005) · Language and Cognitive Processes · doi:10.1080/01690960444000197 · Cited by 145 · see citing works
Self-citationThe role of letter identity and letter position in orthographic priming
Peressotti, F., & Jonathan Grainger, B. (1999) · Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/bf03205539 · Cited by 143 · see citing works
Self-citationSemantic transparency and masked morphological priming: The case of prefixed words
Diependaele, K., Sandra, D., & Grainger, J. (2009) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/mc.37.6.895 · Cited by 132 · see citing works
Self-citationAcha, J., & Perea, M. (2007) · British Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1348/000712607x224478 · Cited by 126 · see citing works
Wheat, K. L., Cornelissen, P. L., Frost, S. J., & Hansen, P. (2010) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.4448-09.2010 · Cited by 124 · see citing works
Borowsky, R., Cummine, J., Owen, W. J., Friesen, C. K., Shih, F., & Sarty, G. E. (2006) · Brain Topography · doi:10.1007/s10548-006-0001-2 · Cited by 121 · see citing works
Letter‐position encoding and dyslexia
Whitney, C., & Cornelissen, P. (2005) · Journal of Research in Reading · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9817.2005.00270.x · Cited by 119 · see citing works
An attention-based associative account of adjacent and nonadjacent dependency learning.
Pacton, S., & Perruchet, P. (2008) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition · doi:10.1037/0278-7393.34.1.80 · Cited by 119 · see citing works
Masked Repetition and Phonological Priming Within and Across Modalities.
Jonathan Grainger, B., Diependaele, K., Spinelli, E., Ferrand, L., & Farioli, F. (2003) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1037/0278-7393.29.6.1256 · Cited by 114 · see citing works
Self-citationVisual and Phonological Codes in Letter and Word Recognition: Evidence from Incremental Priming
Ziegler, J. C., Ferrand, L., Jacobs, A. M., Rey, A., & Grainger, J. (2000) · The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A · doi:10.1080/713755906 · Cited by 113 · see citing works
Self-citationSequential Effects of Phonological Priming in Visual Word Recognition
Carreiras, M., Ferrand, L., Jonathan Grainger, B., & Perea, M. (2005) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01579.x · Cited by 112 · see citing works
Self-citationThe frequency effect for pseudowords in the lexical decision task
Perea, M., Rosa, E., & Gómez, C. (2005) · Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/bf03206493 · Cited by 109 · see citing works
Letter visibility and the viewing position effect in visual word recognition
(2003) · doi:10.3758/bf03194790 · Cited by 108 · see citing works
Self-citationBraun, M., Hutzler, F., Ziegler, J. C., Dambacher, M., & Jacobs, A. M. (2008) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.20643 · Cited by 103 · see citing works
Self-citationMinimizing Binding Errors Using Learned Conjunctive Features
Mel, B. W., & Fiser, J. (2000) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/089976600300015574 · Cited by 95 · see citing works
Fast phonology and the Bimodal Interactive Activation Model
Diependaele, K., Ziegler, J. C., & Jonathan Grainger, B. (2010) · The European Journal of Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1080/09541440902834782 · Cited by 87 · see citing works
Self-citationEffects of lexical status and morphological complexity in masked priming: An ERP study
(2010) · doi:10.1080/01690965.2010.495482 · Cited by 86 · see citing works
Self-citation(1998) · Cited by 84 · see citing works
Self-citationPseudohomophone effects in lexical decision: Still a challenge for current word recognition models.
Ziegler, J. C., Jacobs, A. M., & Klüppel, D. (2001) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance · doi:10.1037/0096-1523.27.3.547 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
Self-citationLetter-transposition effects are not universal: The impact of transposing letters in Hebrew
Velan, H., & Frost, R. (2009) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/j.jml.2009.05.003 · Cited by 80 · see citing works
The search for an input-coding scheme: Transposed-letter priming in Arabic
Perea, M., Mallouh, R. A., & Carreiras, M. (2010) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/pbr.17.3.375 · Cited by 74 · see citing works
Frost, R., Ahissar, M., Gotesman, R., & Tayeb, S. (2003) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/s0749-596x(02)00510-7 · Cited by 74 · see citing works
Whitney, C., & Cornelissen, P. L. (2008) · Language and Cognitive Processes · doi:10.1080/01690960701579771 · Cited by 74 · see citing works
Davis, M. H., & Rastle, K. (2010) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/pbr.17.5.749 · Cited by 72 · see citing works
Hebrew Brain vs. English Brain: Language Modulates the Way It Is Processed
Bick, A. S., Goelman, G., & Frost, R. (2011) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn.2010.21583 · Cited by 71 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…to the role of fusiform gyrus in fine-grained orthographic processing as defined in our account, it is important to note that there is evidence suggesting that sublexical morpho-orthographic processing is performed by neural structures in this region (Bick et al., 2011; Solomyak and Marantz, 2009).”
BackgroundBijeljac-Babic, R., Millogo, V., Farioli, F., & Jonathan Grainger, B. (2004) · Reading and Writing · doi:10.1023/b:read.0000032664.20755.af · Cited by 67 · see citing works
Self-citationA study of relative-position priming with superset primes.
Assche, E. V., & Jonathan Grainger, B. (2006) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1037/0278-7393.32.2.399 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
Self-citationFRANKISH, C. R., & Turner, E. L. (2006) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/j.jml.2006.11.002 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
A developmental perspective on the neural code for written words
Goswami, U., & Ziegler, J. C. (2006) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2006.02.006 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
Self-citationEarly involvement of dorsal and ventral pathways in visual word recognition: An ERP study
Rosazza, C., Cai, Q., Minati, L., Paulignan, Y., & Nazir, T. A. (2009) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2009.03.033 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
Stem and derivational-suffix processing during reading by French second and third graders
Colé, P., Bouton, S., Leuwers, C., Casalis, S., & Sprenger-Charolles, L. (2011) · Applied Psycholinguistics · doi:10.1017/s0142716411000282 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Variability and detection of invariant structure
Gómez, R. L. (2001) · PsycEXTRA Dataset · doi:10.1037/e537102012-224 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
The connectionist dual process (CDP) approach to modelling reading aloud
Zorzi, M. (2010) · European Journal of Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1080/09541440903435621 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Representation of letter position in spelling: Evidence from acquired dysgraphia
Fischer-Baum, S., McCloskey, M., & Rapp, B. (2010) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2010.03.013 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Research in Language Production
(2012) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139029377.021 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Implicit phonological priming during visual word recognition
Wilson, L. B., Tregellas, J. R., Slason, E., Pasko, B. E., & Rojas, D. C. (2010) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.12.019 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Early Parallel Processing in Reading: A Connectionist Approach.
Mozer, M. C. (1986) · Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC) · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Letter position coding in printed word perception: Effects of repeated and transposed letters
(2004) · doi:10.1080/769813932 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Self-citationThe front end of visual word recognition
(2012) · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Self-citationCross-code consistency effects in visual word recognition.
(2008) · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Self-citationAlario, F.-X., De Cara, B., & Ziegler, J. C. (2007) · Journal of Experimental Child Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2007.02.001 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Self-citationGraded Effects of Number of Inserted Letters in Superset Priming
(2007) · doi:10.1027/1618-3169.55.1.54 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Self-citationA developmental perspective on visual word recognition: New evidence and a self-organising model
Dufau, S., Lété, B., Touzet, C. F., Glotin, H., Ziegler, J. C., & Jonathan Grainger, B. (2010) · The European Journal of Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1080/09541440903031230 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Self-citationShort Article: Lexical and Sublexical Processes in the Perception of Transposed-Letter Anagrams
Frankish, C., & Barnes, L. (2008) · Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1080/17470210701664880 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Acha, J., & Perea, M. (2009) · Experimental Psychology (formerly Zeitschrift für Experimentelle Psychologie) · doi:10.1027/1618-3169/a000029 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Ventral and Dorsal Contributions to Word Reading
(2009) · doi:10.7551/mitpress/8029.003.0070 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
An Adaptive Resonance Theory account of the implicit learning of orthographic word forms
Glotin, H., Warnier, P., Dandurand, F., Dufau, S., Lété, B., Touzet, C. F., Ziegler, J. C., & Jonathan Grainger, B. (2009) · Journal of Physiology-Paris · doi:10.1016/j.jphysparis.2009.11.003 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Self-citationDerivational morphology and skilled reading: An empirical overview.
Diependaele, K., Jonathan Grainger, B., & Sandra, D. (2008) · HAL Portal Artxiker (Hindustan Aeronautics Limited (India)) · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Semantic transparency and masked morphological priming: An ERP investigation
(2006) · doi:10.1037/e527352012-815 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Self-citationFast phonology and the bimodal interactive activation model
(2009) · doi:10.1037/e520562012-725 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Self-citationSequential effects of masked phonological priming.
Carreiras, M., Ferrand, L., Jonathan Grainger, B., & Perea, M. (2005) · HAL Portal Artxiker (Hindustan Aeronautics Limited (India)) · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
22 of the 143 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Towards a universal model of reading
Frost, R. (2012) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x11001841 · Cited by 489 · see citing works
Anatomical Connections of the Visual Word Form Area
Bouhali, F., de Schotten, M. T., Pinel, P., Poupon, C., Mangin, J., Dehaene, S., & Cohen, L. (2014) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.4918-13.2014 · Cited by 216 · see citing works
Grainger, J., Dufau, S., & Ziegler, J. (2016) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2015.12.008 · Cited by 201 · see citing works
Self-citationZiegler, J. C., Perry, C., & Zorzi, M. (2014) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2012.0397 · Cited by 204 · see citing works
Self-citationOrthographic processing: A ‘mid-level’ vision of reading: The 44th Sir Frederic Bartlett Lecture
Jonathan Grainger, B. (2017) · Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1080/17470218.2017.1314515 · Cited by 185 · see citing works
Self-citationEvidence for multiple routes in learning to read
Jonathan Grainger, B., Lété, B., Bertand, D., Dufau, S., & Ziegler, J. C. (2012) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2012.01.003 · Cited by 165 · see citing works
Self-citationchildLex: a lexical database of German read by children
(2014) · doi:10.3758/s13428-014-0528-1 · Cited by 169 · see citing works
Marelli, M., & Baroni, M. (2015) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/a0039267 · Cited by 148 · see citing works
Orthographic Processing in Baboons ( Papio papio )
(2012) · doi:10.1126/science.1218152 · Cited by 144 · see citing works
Self-citationEdge-Aligned Embedded Word Activation Initiates Morpho-orthographic Segmentation
Jonathan Grainger, B., & Beyersmann, E. (2017) · The Psychology of learning and motivation/The psychology of learning and motivation · doi:10.1016/bs.plm.2017.03.009 · Cited by 101 · see citing works
Self-citationZiegler, J. C., Bertrand, D., Lété, B., & Jonathan Grainger, B. (2013) · Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0035187 · Cited by 105 · see citing works
Self-citationYou That Read Wrong Again! A Transposed-Word Effect in Grammaticality Judgments
Mirault, J., Snell, J., & Jonathan Grainger, B. (2018) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797618806296 · Cited by 98 · see citing works
Self-citationLanguage proficiency and morpho-orthographic segmentation
Beyersmann, E., Casalis, S., Ziegler, J. C., & Jonathan Grainger, B. (2014) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-014-0752-9 · Cited by 91 · see citing works
Self-citationLallier, M., & Carreiras, M. (2017) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-017-1273-0 · Cited by 89 · see citing works
Borleffs, E., Maassen, B., Lyytinen, H., & Zwarts, F. (2017) · Reading and Writing · doi:10.1007/s11145-017-9741-5 · Cited by 86 · see citing works
Orthographic processing deficits in developmental dyslexia: Beyond the ventral visual stream
Boros, M., Anton, J., Pech-Georgel, C., Grainger, J., Szwed, M., & Ziegler, J. (2016) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.01.014 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
Self-citationChetail, F. (2017) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2017.02.015 · Cited by 80 · see citing works
Zarić, J., Hasselhorn, M., & Nagler, T. (2020) · European Journal of Psychology of Education · doi:10.1007/s10212-020-00464-7 · Cited by 85 · see citing works
Borleffs, E., Maassen, B., Lyytinen, H., & Zwarts, F. (2019) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02534 · Cited by 87 · see citing works
Orthographic depth and developmental dyslexia: a meta-analytic study
Carioti, D., Masia, M. F., Travellini, S., & Berlingeri, M. (2021) · Annals of Dyslexia · doi:10.1007/s11881-021-00226-0 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
A mesial-to-lateral dissociation for orthographic processing in the visual cortex
Bouhali, F., Bézagu, Z., Dehaene, S., & Cohen, L. (2019) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1904184116 · Cited by 64 · see citing works
Orthographic knowledge: clarifications, challenges, and future directions
Apel, K., Henbest, V. S., & Masterson, J. J. (2018) · Reading and Writing · doi:10.1007/s11145-018-9895-9 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
Reconsidering the role of orthographic redundancy in visual word recognition
Chetail, F. (2015) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00645 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
Children's and adults' parafoveal processes in German: Phonological and orthographic effects
Tiffin‐Richards, S. P., & Schroeder, S. (2015) · Journal of Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1080/20445911.2014.999076 · Cited by 64 · see citing works
Jonathan Grainger, B., Mathôt, S., & Vitu, F. (2013) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2013.11.014 · Cited by 65 · see citing works
Self-citationEmbedded Stem Priming Effects in Prefixed and Suffixed Pseudowords
Beyersmann, E., Cavalli, E., Casalis, S., & Colé, P. (2016) · Scientific Studies of Reading · doi:10.1080/10888438.2016.1140769 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
Hasenäcker, J., Beyersmann, E., & Schroeder, S. (2016) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00929 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
Differential Sensitivity of Letters, Numbers, and Symbols to Character Transpositions
Duñabeitia, J. A., Dimitropoulou, M., Jonathan Grainger, B., Hernandez-Cabrera, J. A., & Carreiras, M. (2011) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn_a_00180 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
Self-citationTracking hierarchical processing in morphological decomposition with brain potentials.
Lavric, A., Elchlepp, H., & Rastle, K. (2012) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance · doi:10.1037/a0028960 · Cited by 64 · see citing works
Moulton, E., Bouhali, F., Monzalvo, K., Poupon, C., Zhang, H., Dehaene, S., Dehaene-Lambertz, G., & Dubois, J. (2019) · Brain Structure and Function · doi:10.1007/s00429-019-01855-3 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Decoding levels of representation in reading: A representational similarity approach
Fischer‐Baum, S., Bruggemann, D., Gallego, I. F., Li, D. S. P., & Tamez, E. R. (2017) · Cortex · doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2017.02.017 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
Seeing stems everywhere: Position-independent identification of stem morphemes.
Crepaldi, D., Rastle, K., Davis, C. J., & Lupker, S. J. (2012) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance · doi:10.1037/a0029713 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
Neural consequences of bilingualism for cortical and subcortical function
Krizman, J., & Marian, V. (2015) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781107447257.027 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
Proficiency modulates early orthographic and phonological processing in L2 spoken word recognition
Veivo, O., & Järvikivi, J. (2012) · Bilingualism Language and Cognition · doi:10.1017/s1366728912000600 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
Schmidtke, D., Matsuki, K., & Kuperman, V. (2017) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1037/xlm0000411 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
ERP correlates of letter identity and letter position are modulated by lexical frequency
Vergara‐Martínez, M., Perea, M., Gómez, P., & Swaab, T. Y. (2013) · Brain and Language · doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2012.12.009 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
From decomposition to distributed theories of morphological processing in reading
Stevens, P., & Plaut, D. C. (2022) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-022-02086-0 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
Stites, M. C., Federmeier, K. D., & Christianson, K. (2016) · Language Cognition and Neuroscience · doi:10.1080/23273798.2016.1212082 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
How does graphotactic knowledge influence children's learning of new spellings?
Pacton, S., Sobaco, A., Fayol, M., & Rebecca Treiman, A. (2013) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00701 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
Remembering Words in Context as Predicted by an Associative Read-Out Model
Hofmann, M., Kuchinke, L., Biemann, C., Tamm, S., & Jacobs, A. M. (2011) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00252 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Music and words in the visual cortex: The impact of musical expertise
Mongelli, V., Dehaene, S., Vinckier, F., Peretz, I., Bartolomeo, P., & Cohen, L. (2016) · Cortex · doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2016.05.016 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Masked suffix priming and morpheme positional constraints
Crepaldi, D., Hemsworth, L., Davis, C. J., & Rastle, K. (2015) · Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1080/17470218.2015.1027713 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Law, J., Veispak, A., Vanderauwera, J., & Ghesquière, P. (2017) · Applied Psycholinguistics · doi:10.1017/s0142716417000467 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Quémart, P., & Casalis, S. (2013) · Applied Psycholinguistics · doi:10.1017/s014271641300026x · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Fernandes, T., Vale, A. P., Martins, B., Morais, J., & Kolinsky, R. (2013) · Developmental Science · doi:10.1111/desc.12102 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Eye movements of children and adults reading in three different orthographies.
Schroeder, S., Häikiö, T., Pagán, A., Dickins, J. H., Hyönä, J., & Liversedge, S. P. (2021) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1037/xlm0001099 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
Procura-PALavras (P-PAL): A Web-based interface for a new European Portuguese lexical database
Soares, A. P., Sanromán, Á. I., Almeida, J. J., Simões, A., Costa, A., Machado, J., França, P. F., Comesaña, M., Rauber, A. S., Rato, A. A. D. S., et al. (2018) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-018-1058-z · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Global and local pitch perception in children with developmental dyslexia
Ziegler, J. C., Pech‐Georgel, C., George, F., & Foxton, J. M. (2011) · Brain and Language · doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2011.12.002 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Self-citationHäikiö, T., Hyönä, J., & Bertram, R. (2014) · Journal of Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1080/20445911.2014.982126 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
Morphemes as letter chunks: Discovering affixes through visual regularities
Lelonkiewicz, J. R., Ktori, M., & Crepaldi, D. (2020) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/j.jml.2020.104152 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
From sound to meaning: Phonology-to-Semantics mapping in visual word recognition
Amenta, S., Marelli, M., & Sulpizio, S. (2016) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-016-1152-0 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Protein Analysis Meets Visual Word Recognition: A Case for String Kernels in the Brain
Hannagan, T., & Jonathan Grainger, B. (2012) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/j.1551-6709.2012.01236.x · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Self-citationSensitivity to configural information and expertise in visual word recognition.
Wong, A. C. ‐., Wong, Y. K., Lui, K. F. H., Ng, T., & Ngan, V. S. H. (2018) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance · doi:10.1037/xhp0000590 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Task-Dependent Masked Priming Effects in Visual Word Recognition
Kinoshita, S., & Norris, D. G. (2012) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00178 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Orthographic neighborhood effects as a function of word frequency: An event‐related potential study
Vergara‐Martínez, M., & Swaab, T. Y. (2012) · Psychophysiology · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.2012.01410.x · Cited by 40 · see citing works
A developmental investigation of the first-letter advantage
Jonathan Grainger, B., Bertrand, D., Lété, B., Beyersmann, E., & Ziegler, J. C. (2016) · Journal of Experimental Child Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2016.07.016 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Self-citationBrain mechanisms of recovery from pure alexia: A single case study with multiple longitudinal scans.
Cohen, L., Dehaene, S., McCormick, S. F., Durant, S., & Zanker, J. (2016) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.07.009 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Reading without phonology: ERP evidence from skilled deaf readers of Spanish
Costello, B., Caffarra, S., Fariña, N., Duñabeitia, J., & Carreiras, M. (2021) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-021-84490-5 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
The enigma of dyslexic musicians
Weiss, A. H., Granot, R., & Ahissar, M. (2013) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.12.009 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Parafoveal preprocessing of word initial trigrams during reading in adults and children.
Pagán, A., Blythe, H. I., & Liversedge, S. P. (2015) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1037/xlm0000175 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Syllable-based reading improvement: Effects on word reading and reading comprehension in Grade 2
Müller, B., Richter, T., & Karageorgos, P. (2020) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2020.101304 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Differences in the Processing of Prefixes and Suffixes Revealed by a Letter-Search Task
Beyersmann, E., Ziegler, J. C., & Jonathan Grainger, B. (2015) · Scientific Studies of Reading · doi:10.1080/10888438.2015.1057824 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Self-citationWhat is special about orthographic processing?
Jonathan Grainger, B., & Hannagan, T. (2014) · Written Language & Literacy · doi:10.1075/wll.17.2.03gra · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Self-citationEarly Activity in Broca's Area During Reading Reflects Fast Access to Articulatory Codes From Print
Klein, M., Jonathan Grainger, B., Wheat, K. L., Millman, R. E., Simpson, M. I. G., Hansen, P., & Cornelissen, P. L. (2014) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bht350 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Self-citationKormos, J., Babuder, M. K., & Pižorn, K. (2018) · Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1093/applin/amy028 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Borleffs, E., Glatz, T., Daulay, D. A., Richardson, U., Zwarts, F., & Maassen, B. (2017) · European Journal of Psychology of Education · doi:10.1007/s10212-017-0354-9 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Orthographic Coding in Illiterates and Literates
Duñabeitia, J. A., Orihuela, K., & Carreiras, M. (2014) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797614531026 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Breaking boundaries: Letter transpositions and morphological processing
(2012) · doi:10.1080/01690965.2012.719082 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Self-citationBehavioral and ERP evidence of word and pseudoword superiority effects in 7- and 11-year-olds
Coch, D., Mitra, P., & George, E. (2012) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2012.09.041 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Letters, Words, Sentences, and Reading
Jonathan Grainger, B. (2024) · Journal of Cognition · doi:10.5334/joc.396 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Self-citationThe syllabic bridge: the first step in learning spelling-to-sound correspondences*
Doignon‐Camus, N., & Zagar, D. (2013) · Journal of Child Language · doi:10.1017/s0305000913000305 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Steacy, L. M., & Compton, D. L. (2018) · Journal of Experimental Child Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2018.09.007 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Levesque, K., & Deacon, S. H. (2022) · Applied Psycholinguistics · doi:10.1017/s0142716422000194 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Fuzzy Lexical Representations in Adult Second Language Speakers
Gor, K., Cook, S. V., Bordag, D., Chrabaszcz, A., & Opitz, A. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.732030 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Modeling the Variability of Developmental Dyslexia
Ziegler, J. C., Perry, C., & Zorzi, M. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108553377.016 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Self-citationDevelopmental changes associated with cross-language similarity in bilingual children
Duñabeitia, J. A., Ivaz, L., & Casaponsa, A. (2015) · Journal of Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1080/20445911.2015.1086773 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Cho, E., Lee, M., & Toste, J. R. (2018) · Learning and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2018.05.017 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Letter Transpositions within Morphemes and across Morpheme Boundaries
Beyersmann, E., McCormick, S. F., & Rastle, K. (2013) · Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1080/17470218.2013.782326 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Bar-On, A., Shalhoub‐Awwad, Y., & TUMA-BASILA, R. I. (2018) · Applied Psycholinguistics · doi:10.1017/s0142716418000310 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Hsiao, J. H., & Lam, S.-M. (2013) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/cogs.12033 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Lexical processing of nominal compounds in first- and second-language learners across primary grades
de Zeeuw, M., Schreuder, R., & Verhoeven, L. T. W. (2014) · Writing Systems Research · doi:10.1080/17586801.2014.926806 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
From sublexical facilitation to lexical competition: ERP effects of masked neighbor priming
(2018) · doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2018.01.029 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Self-citationNeurofunctionally dissecting the reading system in children
Liebig, J., Froehlich, E., Morawetz, C., Braun, M., Jacobs, A., Heekeren, H., & Ziegler, J. (2017) · Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.dcn.2017.07.002 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Self-citationMorphological decomposition and the transposed-letter (TL) position effect
Taft, M., & Nillsen, C. (2012) · Language and Cognitive Processes · doi:10.1080/01690965.2012.679662 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Simulation Analyses of tDCS Montages for the Investigation of Dorsal and Ventral Pathways
Bhattacharjee, S., Kashyap, R., Rapp, B. C., Oishi, K., Desmond, J. E., & Chen, S. A. (2019) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-019-47654-y · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Wen, Y., Mirault, J., & Jonathan Grainger, B. (2020) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1037/xlm0000811 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Self-citationDeep generative learning of location-invariant visual word recognition
Bono, M. G. D., & Zorzi, M. (2013) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00635 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
The role of phonology during visual word learning in adults: An integrative review
Meade, G. F. (2019) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-019-01647-0 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Can letter position encoding be modified by visual perceptual elements?
Marcet, A., Perea, M., Baciero, A., & Gómez, P. (2018) · Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1177/1747021818789876 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Spoken word identification involves accessing position invariant phoneme representations
Bowers, J. S., Kazanina, N., & Andermane, N. (2015) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/j.jml.2015.11.002 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Mozzi, A., Riva, V., Forni, D., Sironi, M., Marino, C., Molteni, M., Riva, S., Guerini, F. R., Clerici, M., Cagliani, R., et al. (2017) · American Journal of Medical Genetics Part B Neuropsychiatric Genetics · doi:10.1002/ajmg.b.32546 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
- Authors
- Grainger, J., & Ziegler, J. C.
- Affiliations
- Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
- ORCID
- Ziegler, Johannes C.
- Venue
- Frontiers in Psychology
- Publisher
- Frontiers Media SA
- Published
- 2011
- Volume
- 2
- Pages
- 54-54
- ISSN
- 1664-1078 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC3110785
- OpenAlex
- W2069201295
- Semantic Scholar
- 532c60b1075056972463e8bc4b0dcb4378ff2927
- Cited by
- 459
- References
- 143
- Citations by year
- 2026: 17 · 2025: 33 · 2024: 35 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 45 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 32 · 2018: 36 · 2017: 35 · 2016: 31 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 25 · 2012: 26
- FWCI
- 51.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Frontiers in Psychology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
- Keywords
- orthographic processing, dual-route model, reading acquisition, orthographic code, skilled reading, sublexical processing, morphological processing, graphemes, letter position, prefixes and suffixes
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-09-28.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-09-28.
Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review