CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 27

Automatic activation of phonology in silent reading is parallel: Evidence from beginning and skilled readers

Alario, F.-Xavier, De Cara, Bruno, Ziegler, Johannes C.·2007·Journal of Experimental Child Psychology
DOI 10.1016/j.jecp.2007.02.001
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The picture-word interference paradigm was used to shed new light on the debate concerning slow serial versus fast parallel activation of phonology in silent reading. Prereaders, beginning readers (Grades 1-4), and adults named pictures that had words printed on them. Words and pictures shared phonology either at the beginnings of words (e.g., DOLL-DOG) or at the ends of words (e.g., FOG-DOG). The results showed that phonological overlap between primes and targets facilitated picture naming. This facilitatory effect was present even in beginning readers. More important, from Grade 1 onward, end-related facilitation always was as strong as beginning-related facilitation. This result suggests that, from the beginning of reading, the implicit and automatic activation of phonological codes during silent reading is not serial but rather parallel.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jecp.2007.02.001

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Development of parallel letter identification causes a shift from sequential letter encoding to parallel mapping onto higher-level orthographic representations such as graphemes and affixes, retaining precision.

    “The development of parallel letter identification is therefore hypothesized to cause a shift from a strictly sequential letter encoding (that outputs an ordered set of phonemes) to a more parallel mapping of letters onto higher-level orthographic representations such as graphemes and affixes, that retains the same level of precision as the strictly sequential mechanism (see Alario et al., 2007).”

    From A Dual-Route Approach to Orthographic Processing (2011) · cites this paper as Alario et al., 2007

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Alario, F.-X., De Cara, B., & Ziegler, J. C.
Venue
Journal of Experimental Child Psychology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-07
Volume
97
Issue
3
Pages
205-219
ISSN
0022-0965
DOI
10.1016/j.jecp.2007.02.001
Cited by
27
References
4
Language
en
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review