The DOI matches its Crossref record; 48 of the 48 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The influence of negligence, intention, and outcome on children’s moral judgments
Open accessAbstract
Piaget (1932) and subsequent researchers have reported that young children's moral judgments are based more on the outcomes of actions than on the agents' intentions. The current study investigated whether negligence might also influence these judgments and explain children's apparent focus on outcome. Children (3-8 years of age) and adults (N=139) rated accidental actions in which the valences of intention, negligence, and outcome were varied systematically. Participants of all ages were influenced primarily by intention, and well-intentioned actions were also evaluated according to negligence and outcome. Only two young children based their judgments solely on outcome. It is suggested that previous studies have underestimated children's use of intention because outcome and negligence have been confounded. Negative consequences are considered to be important because children assume that they are caused by negligence. The findings indicate that young children can show sophisticated understanding of the roles of intention and negligence in moral judgments.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Additionally, new research has also shown that when children are given information about outcome, intentions and negligence, that they are influenced strongly by intentions in making punishment judgments (Nobes, et al., 2009).”
From The accidental transgressor: Morally-relevant theory of mind (2011) · cites this paper as Nobes, et al., 2009
In the citing paper
“This is because children view punishment as more acceptable when a transgression has negative rather than neutral (or positive) intentions (Nobes, et al., 2009).”
From The accidental transgressor: Morally-relevant theory of mind (2011) · cites this paper as Nobes, et al., 2009
In the citing paper
“Additionally, recent research suggests that children and adults do use information about an actor’s negligence in making moral judgments and assessments of punishment acceptability (Nobes, et al., 2009).”
From The accidental transgressor: Morally-relevant theory of mind (2011) · cites this paper as Nobes, et al., 2009
Citations
Cites
The psychology of interpersonal relations
Heider, F. (1958) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2089062 · Cited by 17,189
A Handbook of Child Psychology
(1932) · Nature · doi:10.1038/130331a0 · Cited by 10,133
Ethics: Inventing Right and Wrong.
Feldman, F., & Mackie, J. L. (1979) · The Philosophical Review · doi:10.2307/2184791 · Cited by 5,076
The Moral Judgment Of The Child
Piaget, J. (2013) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315009681 · Cited by 4,409
The Development of Social Knowledge. Morality and Convention
Eggleston, S. J., & Turiel, E. (1985) · British Journal of Educational Studies · doi:10.2307/3121515 · Cited by 2,645
Turiel, E. (2007) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9780470147658.chpsy0313 · Cited by 2,156
Understanding the intentions of others: Re-enactment of intended acts by 18-month-old children.
Meltzoff, A. N. (1995) · Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1037/0012-1649.31.5.838 · Cited by 2,087
Suggestibility of the child witness: A historical review and synthesis.
Ceci, S. J., & Bruck, M. (1993) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.113.3.403 · Cited by 1,462
Hart, H. L. A., & Gardner, J. B. (2008) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199534777.001.0001 · Cited by 1,146
PUNISHMENT AND RESPONSIBILITY: ESSAYS IN THE PHILOSOPHY OF LAW
Cherry, C. (1969) · Philosophical Books · doi:10.1111/j.1468-0149.1969.tb01474.x · Cited by 891
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The development of intent-based moral judgment
Cushman, F. A., Sheketoff, R. W., Wharton, S., & Carey, S. E. (2013) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2012.11.008 · Cited by 415
The accidental transgressor: Morally-relevant theory of mind
Killen, M., Mulvey, K. L., Richardson, C., Jampol, N., & Woodward, A. (2011) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2011.01.006 · Cited by 384
Origins and Development of Morality
Killen, M., & Smetana, J. G. (2015) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781118963418.childpsy317 · Cited by 300
Failed attempts to help and harm: Intention versus outcome in preverbal infants’ social evaluations
Hamlin, J. K. (2013) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2013.04.004 · Cited by 305
Moral decision-making and moral development: Toward an integrative framework
Garrigan, B., Adlam, A., & Langdon, P. E. (2018) · Developmental Review · doi:10.1016/j.dr.2018.06.001 · Cited by 225
Metadata
- Authors
- Nobes, G., Panagiotaki, G., & Pawson, C.
- Affiliations
- University of East Anglia (GB)
- University of East London (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Nobes, Gavin
- Venue
- Journal of Experimental Child Psychology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2009-12
- Volume
- 104
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 382-397
- ISSN
- 0022-0965 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2148468027
- Cited by
- 136
- References
- 43
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 1.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- eprints.uwe.ac.uk
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Experimental Child Psychology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- UEA Digital Repository (University of East Anglia) (acceptedVersion)
- UWE Research Repository (UWE Bristol) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Emotions and Moral Behavior
- Keywords
- moral judgment, children's moral reasoning, intention, negligence, outcomes, accidental actions, moral valence, developmental differences, blame attribution
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Child, Child Development, Child, Preschool, Female, Humans, Judgment, Male, Morals, Motivation, Social Perception, Intention, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
