Cited by 86Visual perception and processing mechanismsReading and Literacy DevelopmentOphthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies

Developmental changes during childhood in single-letter acuity and its crowding by surrounding contours

Jeon, Seong Taek, Hamid, Joshua, Maurer, Daphne, Lewis, Terri L.·2010·Journal of Experimental Child Psychology

Abstract

Crowding refers to impaired target recognition caused by surrounding contours. We investigated the development of crowding in central vision by comparing single-letter and crowding thresholds in groups of 5-year-olds, 8-year-olds, 11-year-olds, and adults. The task was to discriminate the orientation of a Sloan letter E. Single-letter thresholds, defined as the stroke width forming the smallest discriminable E, were worse than those of adults (0.83 arcmin) at 5 years of age (1.05 arcmin) but not at older ages (8-year-olds: 0.81 arcmin; 11-year-olds: 0.78 arcmin). The maximum distances over which crowding occurred, as measured in multiples of threshold stroke width, were smaller in adults (2.83) than in the three groups of children, who did not differ from each other (5-year-olds: 7.03; 8-year-olds: 7.84; 11-year-olds: 7.13). Thus, even 11-year-olds are more affected than adults by surrounding contours despite having single-letter acuity that has been mature for several years. The stronger influence of crowding in children may be caused by immaturities in the brain areas beyond the primary visual cortex (V1) where early visual inputs are combined and may contribute to their slower reading speed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jecp.2010.05.009

Cites

67 of 67 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Data analysis used Paired Sample T-Test with bootstrap (k=5000, 95% BCa) because the normal distribution assumption is rarely met and to improve small sample analysis.

    “The data analysis will use Paired Sample T-Test with bootstrap technique to compare the measures at pre-test and post-test. The bootstrapped statistical significance is used, instead of the usual normal curve statistical significance. The use of bootstrap has been recommended for experimental clinical psychology research, as the normal distribution assumption is rarely met[44]. Furthermore, boot”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 68 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jeon, S. T., Hamid, J., Maurer, D., & Lewis, T. L.
Affiliations
McMaster University (CA)
Corresponding author
Lewis, Terri L.
Venue
Journal of Experimental Child Psychology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-12
Volume
107
Issue
4
Pages
423-437
ISSN
0022-0965 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2153796794
Cited by
86
References
68
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 8
FWCI
3.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Experimental Child Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ResearchOnline (Glasgow Caledonian University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • McDonnell Foundation
  • Canadian Institutes of Health Research
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
Keywords
visual crowding, central vision, stroke width, crowding distance, reading speed, visual cortex maturation
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Age Factors, Child, Child Development, Child, Preschool, Female, Humans, Male, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Task Performance and Analysis, Visual Acuity, Recognition, Psychology, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review