Cited by 66Memory Processes and InfluencesChild Abuse and TraumaDeception detection and forensic psychology

Event memory and suggestibility in abused and neglected children: trauma-related psychopathology and cognitive functioning

Chae, Yoojin, Goodman, Gail S., Eisen, Mitchell L., Qin, Jianjian·2011·Journal of Experimental Child Psychology

Abstract

This study examined event memory and suggestibility in 3- to 16-year-olds involved in forensic investigations of child maltreatment. A total of 322 children were interviewed about a play activity with an unfamiliar adult. Comprehensive measures of individual differences in trauma-related psychopathology and cognitive functioning were administered. Sexually and/or physically abused children obtained higher dissociation scores than neglected children, and sexually abused children were more likely to obtain a diagnosis of posttraumatic stress disorder than physically abused children, neglected children, and children with no substantiated abuse histories. Overall, older children and children with better cognitive functioning produced more correct information and fewer memory errors. Abuse status per se did not significantly predict children's memory or suggestibility whether considered alone or in interaction with age. However, among highly dissociative children, more trauma symptoms were associated with greater inaccuracy, whereas trauma symptoms were not associated with increased error for children who were lower in dissociative tendencies. Implications of the findings for understanding eyewitness memory in maltreated children are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jecp.2011.05.006

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chae, Y., Goodman, G. S., Eisen, M. L., & Qin, J.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Davis (US)
  • California State University Los Angeles (US)
  • California State University, Sacramento (US)
Corresponding author
  • Chae, Yoojin
  • Goodman, Gail S.
Venue
Journal of Experimental Child Psychology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-12
Volume
110
Issue
4
Pages
520-538
ISSN
0022-0965 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2163617457
Cited by
66
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 3
FWCI
1.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Experimental Child Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Deception detection and forensic psychology
Keywords
event memory, suggestibility, child abuse, child neglect, dissociation, post-traumatic stress disorder, eyewitness memory, memory errors, cognitive function, age differences, forensic interviewing, trauma symptoms
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Child, Child Abuse, Child Abuse, Sexual, Child, Preschool, Cognition, Dissociative Disorders, Female, Humans, Interview, Psychological, Male, Memory, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Psychological Tests, Suggestion, Wechsler Scales

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review