Neighborhood effects in the Brazilian Amazônia: protected areas and deforestation
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Sustainable use areas generally had the smallest or no impact on deforestation, as they still allow limited clearing.
“Sustainable use areas generally had the smallest 479 or no impact on deforestation, as they still allow limited clearing [132].”
From A systematic comparison of deforestation drivers and policy effectiveness across the Amazon biome (2023) · cites this paper as [132]
Cites
Bowman, M. S., Soares-Filho, B. S., Merry, F. D., Nepstad, D. C., Rodrigues, H., & Almeida, O. T. (2012) · Land Use Policy · doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2011.09.009 · Cited by 282 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A systematic comparison of deforestation drivers and policy effectiveness across the Amazon biome
Hänggli, A., Levy, S. A., Armenteras, D., Bovolo, C. I., Brandão, J., Rueda, X., & Garrett, R. D. (2023) · Environmental Research Letters · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/acd408 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
- Authors
- Amin, A., Choumert-Nkolo, J., Combes, J.-L., Combes Motel, P., Kéré, E. N., Ongono-Olinga, J.-G., & Schwartz, S.
- Affiliations
- Université Félix Houphouët-Boigny (CI)
- Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
- Corresponding author
- Schwartz, S.
- Venue
- Journal of Environmental Economics and Management
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-01
- Volume
- 93
- Pages
- 272-288
- ISSN
- 0095-0696 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2900847691
- Cited by
- 61
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2
- FWCI
- 1.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Environmental Economics and Management (publishedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Agence Nationale de la Recherche
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Forest Management and Policy
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Land Use and Ecosystem Services
- Keywords
- protected areas, deforestation, Brazilian Amazon, indigenous territories, spatial spillover effects, strategic complementarity, avoided deforestation, environmental policy effectiveness, dynamic spatial Durbin model
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
