Cited by 76Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource ManagementLand Rights and ReformsSocioeconomics of Resources and Conservation

Agricultural productivity and deforestation: Evidence from input subsidies and ethnic favoritism in Malawi

Open access
Abman, Ryan, Carney, Conor·2020·Journal of Environmental Economics and Management

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jeem.2020.102342

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 41 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Abman, R., & Carney, C.
Affiliations
  • San Diego State University (US)
  • College of the Holy Cross (US)
Corresponding author
Abman, Ryan
Venue
Journal of Environmental Economics and Management
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-09
Volume
103
Pages
102342
ISSN
0095-0696 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3036682915
Cited by
75
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1
FWCI
3.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Environmental Economics and Management (publishedVersion)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Land Rights and Reforms
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Socioeconomics of Resources and Conservation
Keywords
agricultural productivity, deforestation, fertilizer subsidies, seed subsidies, ethnic favoritism, political favoritism, agricultural expansion, crop yield, environmental spillovers, smallholder farming, Malawi

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review