Saliency Maps Provide Insights into Artificial Intelligence-Based Electrocardiography Models for Detecting Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Open accessAbstract
Introduction A 12‑lead electrocardiography (ECG)-based convolutional neural network (CNN) model can detect hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). However, since these models do not rely on discrete measurements as inputs, it is not apparent what drives their performance. We hypothesized that saliency maps could be used to visually identify ECG segments that contribute to a CNN's robust classification of HCM. Methods We derived a new one‑lead (lead I) CNN model based on median beats using the same methodology and cohort used for the original 12‑lead CNN model (3047 patients with HCM, and 63,926 sex- and age-matched non-HCM controls). One‑lead, median-beat saliency maps were generated and visually evaluated in an independent cohort of 100 patients with a diagnosis of HCM and a high artificial intelligence (AI)-ECG-HCM probability score to determine which ECG segments contributed to the model's detection of HCM. Results The one‑lead, median-beat CNN had an AUC of 0.90 (95% CI 0.89-0.92) for HCM detection, similar to the original 12‑lead ECG model. In the independent HCM cohort (n = 100), saliency maps highlighted the ST-T segment in 92 ECGs, the atrial depolarization segment in 12 ECGs, and the QRS complex in 5 ECGs. Conclusions Saliency maps of a one‑lead, median-beat-based CNN model identified perturbations in ventricular repolarization as the main region of interest in detecting HCM.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Saliency mapping in AI-ECG detection of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy has highlighted regions concentrated primarily in ventricular repolarization and ST-T segments.
“saliency mapping in AI-ECG detection of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy has highlighted regions concentrated primarily in ventricular repolarization and ST–T segments [48].”
From Deep Learning Applied to 12-Lead ECGs for Detection of Structural, Metabolic and Systemic Disease (2026) · cites this paper as [48]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 36 · Cited by 38
- Authors
- Siontis, K. C., Suárez, A. B., Sehrawat, O., Ackerman, M. J., Attia, Z. I., Friedman, P. A., Noseworthy, P. A., & Maanja, M.
- Affiliations
- Mayo Clinic (US)
- Corresponding author
- Maanja, Maren
- ORCID
- Venue
- Journal of Electrocardiology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2023-11
- Volume
- 81
- Pages
- 286-291
- ISSN
- 0022-0736 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4383677297
- Cited by
- 38
- References
- 36
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 1
- FWCI
- 7.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Electrocardiology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Karolinska Institutet
- Erik och Edith Fernströms Stiftelse för Medicinsk Forskning
- Hjärt-Lungfonden
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › ECG Monitoring and Analysis
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
- Keywords
- hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, saliency maps, electrocardiogram, convolutional neural networks, ST-T segment, ventricular repolarization, atrial depolarization, QRS complex
- MeSH terms
- Artificial Intelligence, Cardiomyopathy, Hypertrophic, Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted, Electrocardiography, Humans, Neural Networks, Computer
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review