Cited by 38ECG Monitoring and AnalysisCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmiasArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare

Saliency Maps Provide Insights into Artificial Intelligence-Based Electrocardiography Models for Detecting Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy

Open access
Siontis, Konstantinos C., Suárez, Abraham Báez, Sehrawat, Ojasav, Ackerman, Michael J., Attia, Zachi I., Friedman, Paul A., Noseworthy, Peter A., Maanja, Maren·2023·Journal of Electrocardiology

Abstract

Introduction A 12‑lead electrocardiography (ECG)-based convolutional neural network (CNN) model can detect hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). However, since these models do not rely on discrete measurements as inputs, it is not apparent what drives their performance. We hypothesized that saliency maps could be used to visually identify ECG segments that contribute to a CNN's robust classification of HCM. Methods We derived a new one‑lead (lead I) CNN model based on median beats using the same methodology and cohort used for the original 12‑lead CNN model (3047 patients with HCM, and 63,926 sex- and age-matched non-HCM controls). One‑lead, median-beat saliency maps were generated and visually evaluated in an independent cohort of 100 patients with a diagnosis of HCM and a high artificial intelligence (AI)-ECG-HCM probability score to determine which ECG segments contributed to the model's detection of HCM. Results The one‑lead, median-beat CNN had an AUC of 0.90 (95% CI 0.89-0.92) for HCM detection, similar to the original 12‑lead ECG model. In the independent HCM cohort (n = 100), saliency maps highlighted the ST-T segment in 92 ECGs, the atrial depolarization segment in 12 ECGs, and the QRS complex in 5 ECGs. Conclusions Saliency maps of a one‑lead, median-beat-based CNN model identified perturbations in ventricular repolarization as the main region of interest in detecting HCM.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2023.07.002

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Saliency mapping in AI-ECG detection of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy has highlighted regions concentrated primarily in ventricular repolarization and ST-T segments.

    “saliency mapping in AI-ECG detection of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy has highlighted regions concentrated primarily in ventricular repolarization and ST–T segments [48].”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 36 · Cited by 38

Authors
Siontis, K. C., Suárez, A. B., Sehrawat, O., Ackerman, M. J., Attia, Z. I., Friedman, P. A., Noseworthy, P. A., & Maanja, M.
Affiliations
Mayo Clinic (US)
Corresponding author
Maanja, Maren
Venue
Journal of Electrocardiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-11
Volume
81
Pages
286-291
ISSN
0022-0736 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4383677297
Cited by
38
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 1
FWCI
7.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Electrocardiology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Karolinska Institutet
  • Erik och Edith Fernströms Stiftelse för Medicinsk Forskning
  • Hjärt-Lungfonden
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › ECG Monitoring and Analysis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
Keywords
hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, saliency maps, electrocardiogram, convolutional neural networks, ST-T segment, ventricular repolarization, atrial depolarization, QRS complex
MeSH terms
Artificial Intelligence, Cardiomyopathy, Hypertrophic, Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted, Electrocardiography, Humans, Neural Networks, Computer

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review