Cited by 38Bacterial Infections and VaccinesInfectious Diseases and TuberculosisBacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing

Ten years of clinical experience with adult meningitis at an urban academic medical center

Pizon, Anthony F., Bonner, Matthew R., Wang, Henry E., Kaplan, Richard M.·2006·The Journal of Emergency Medicine

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to describe the clinical presentation and bacteriology of adult patients admitted to an urban academic medical center with bacterial meningitis over a 10-year period. In this retrospective review, we identified all adult patients discharged from a tertiary care facility between November 1992 and March 2003 with a diagnosis of bacterial meningitis. Data regarding demographics, vital signs, presenting symptoms, seven predisposing factors, body fluid cultures, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) findings, and mortality were abstracted. Data were analyzed using descriptive methods. We identified 38 cases. Overall mortality rate was 18.4% (95% confidence interval 7.7-34.3%). The most common of the seven predisposing factors was an immunocompromised state (31.6%). Streptococcus pneumoniae (24.3%), other streptococcus species (24.3%), and Gram-negative rods (16.2%) were the most commonly identified organisms. The classic meningitis triad (fever, neck stiffness, mental status change or headache) was present in only 21.1% of cases. CSF analysis demonstrated WBC >or= 100/mm3 in 81.3%, decreased glucose (< 50 mg/dL) in 50%, and elevated protein (> 45 mg/dL) in 91.2%. With increasing numbers of immunocompromised patients, atypical presentations of bacterial meningitis seem to be more common. A higher percentage of bacterial meningitis cases seem to be caused by Gram-negative rods and Streptococcus species other than Streptococcus pneumoniae. The classic meningitis triad occurred in fewer cases than previously described.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jemermed.2005.07.010

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pizon, A. F., Bonner, M. R., Wang, H. E., & Kaplan, R. M.
Affiliations
  • Banner - University Medical Center Phoenix (US)
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
  • Western Pennsylvania Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Kaplan, Richard M.
Venue
The Journal of Emergency Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-05
Volume
30
Issue
4
Pages
367-370
ISSN
0736-4679 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2102917301
Cited by
38
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1
FWCI
4.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Update notices
erratum (2006-10-01)
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Emergency Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Bacterial Infections and Vaccines
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Infectious Diseases and Tuberculosis
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Clinical Biochemistry › Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing
Keywords
bacterial meningitis, adult meningitis, clinical features, atypical presentation, immunocompromised patients, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Streptococcus, Gram-negative bacilli, cerebrospinal fluid analysis, mortality, predisposing factors
MeSH terms
Academic Medical Centers, Acute Disease, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Female, Hospitals, Urban, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Pennsylvania, Retrospective Studies, Risk Factors, Meningitis, Bacterial

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review