Use of a flexible intubating scope in combination with a channeled video laryngoscope for managing a difficult airway in the emergency department
Abstract
Background Difficulty with intubation is not uncommon in the emergency setting. Video laryngoscopes (VLs) are commonly used to manage the difficult airway in the emergency department (ED). Intubation using a flexible bronchoscope, while considered the gold standard for managing the anticipated difficult airway in the operating room, is not commonly used in the ED. Case We present a case describing VL-assisted flexible scope intubation performed in the ED as a novel feasible approach to managing the difficult airway. A 65-year-old male, post cardiac arrest, with multiple unsuccessful attempts at prehospital intubation had rapid sequence intubation (RSI) performed and, despite obtaining a view with a King Vision™ VL, the skilled operator was unable to advance the endotracheal tube (ETT). An Ambu™ aScope3 flexible intubating scope (FIS) was placed through the ETT loaded in the channel of the King Vision and advanced through the cords to a position proximal to the carina. The ETT was then advanced easily over the FIS and down the trachea. WHY SHOULD AN EMERGENCY PHYSICIAN BE AWARE OF THIS?: Although video laryngoscopy is commonly used in the ED, intubation can prove difficult, despite having an adequate view of the glottis. Use of an FIS, however, through a channeled VL makes navigation of the ETT easier and facilitates tube advancement, which can be difficult with VL. Channeled VL-assisted use of an FIS is a viable option for managing the difficult airway.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
One option to improve visual navigation past the airway injury is to use a VL-assisted flexible endoscopic intubation.
“One option to improve visual navigation past the airway injury is to use a VL-assisted flexible endoscopic intubation.71”
From Airway Management in Trauma (2018) · cites this paper as [71]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Kovacs, G., & Sowers, N. (2018) · Emergency Medicine Clinics of North America · doi:10.1016/j.emc.2017.08.006 · Cited by 115 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Sowers, N., & Kovacs, G.
- Affiliations
- Dalhousie University (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Sowers, Nicholas
- Venue
- The Journal of Emergency Medicine
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2016-02
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 315-319
- ISSN
- 0736-4679 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1868629132
- Cited by
- 14
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1
- FWCI
- 1.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Emergency Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Airway Management and Intubation Techniques
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Tracheal and airway disorders
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Foreign Body Medical Cases
- Keywords
- difficult airway, video laryngoscopy, endotracheal intubation, rapid sequence intubation, post-cardiac arrest, emergency airway management
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Emergency Service, Hospital, Heart Arrest, Humans, Intubation, Intratracheal, Male, Laryngoscopes
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review