Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 59Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care UnitsPalliative Care and End-of-Life IssuesCardiac Arrest and Resuscitation

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 26 of the 26 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Impact of Education on Provider Attitudes Toward Family-Witnessed Resuscitation

Feagan, Lori M., Fisher, Nancy J.·2011·Journal of Emergency Nursing
DOI 10.1016/j.jen.2010.02.023
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Introduction The majority of acute care facilities have not developed policies or guidelines to facilitate family presence during cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Prior studies have shown that the personal beliefs and attitudes of hospital personnel involved in resuscitation efforts are the primary reasons family presence is not offered. Methods This 2-phase, before/after study was conducted in a 388-bed academic trauma center, and in a 143-bed community hospital in eastern Washington State in 2008. In phase I, a convenience sample of physicians and registered nurses from both facilities were surveyed about their opinions and beliefs regarding family-witnessed resuscitation (FWR). Spearman's rho and independent t-tests were used to compare support of FWR between and within roles and practice location subgroups. In phase II of the study, clinician subgroups in the community hospital were re-surveyed following an educational program that used evidence-based information. Independent t-test and one-way ANOVA were used to compare pre and post-education mean scores of subgroups on indicators of effective teaching strategies and improved FWR support. Results Opinions on FWR vary within and between practice roles and locations, with the strongest variable of support being prior experience with FWR. Following FWR education, mean scores improved for survey variables chosen as indicators of FWR support and teaching effectiveness. Discussion When CPR providers are presented with FWR education, their opinion-based beliefs may be modified, decreasing barriers to family witnessed resuscitation and improving overall support of FWR as an extension of family-centered care.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jen.2010.02.023

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 26 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. American Heart Association, 2005, American Heart Association guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care, part 2: ethical issues, Circulation, 112, IV-6

Cited by

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Feagan, L. M., & Fisher, N. J.
Venue
Journal of Emergency Nursing
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-05
Volume
37
Issue
3
Pages
231-239
ISSN
0099-1767 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.jen.2010.02.023
OpenAlex
W2022656987
Cited by
56
References
26
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 6
FWCI
5.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
  • www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
  • www.elsevier.com/legal/tdmrep-license (tdm)
Locations
  • Journal of Emergency Nursing (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine › Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
Keywords
family-witnessed resuscitation, provider attitudes, clinician education, family-centered care, trauma centers, community hospitals
MeSH terms
Adult, Attitude of Health Personnel, Critical Care, Family, Female, Humans, Male, Organizational Innovation, Washington, Clinical Nursing Research, Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation, Patient-Centered Care

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.