Cited by 1,540Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care UnitsInfant Development and Preterm CareIntensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders

Guidelines for Family-Centered Care in the Neonatal, Pediatric, and Adult ICU

Open access
Davidson, Judy E., Aslakson, Rebecca A., Long, Ann C., Puntillo, Kathleen A., Kross, Erin K., Hart, Joanna, Cox, Christopher E., Wunsch, Hannah +21 more·2017·Critical Care Medicine

Abstract

Objective: To provide clinicians with evidence-based strategies to optimize the support of the family of critically ill patients in the ICU. Methods: We used the Council of Medical Specialty Societies principles for the development of clinical guidelines as the framework for guideline development. We assembled an international multidisciplinary team of 29 members with expertise in guideline development, evidence analysis, and family-centered care to revise the 2007 Clinical Practice Guidelines for support of the family in the patient-centered ICU. We conducted a scoping review of qualitative research that explored family-centered care in the ICU. Thematic analyses were conducted to support Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome question development. Patients and families validated the importance of interventions and outcomes. We then conducted a systematic review using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations methodology to make recommendations for practice. Recommendations were subjected to electronic voting with pre-established voting thresholds. No industry funding was associated with the guideline development. Results: The scoping review yielded 683 qualitative studies; 228 were used for thematic analysis and Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome question development. The systematic review search yielded 4,158 reports after deduplication and 76 additional studies were added from alerts and hand searches; 238 studies met inclusion criteria. We made 23 recommendations from moderate, low, and very low level of evidence on the topics of: communication with family members, family presence, family support, consultations and ICU team members, and operational and environmental issues. We provide recommendations for future research and work-tools to support translation of the recommendations into practice. Conclusions: These guidelines identify the evidence base for best practices for family-centered care in the ICU. All recommendations were weak, highlighting the relative nascency of this field of research and the importance of future research to identify the most effective interventions to improve this important aspect of ICU care.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/ccm.0000000000002169

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Four systematic reviews reported mixed findings regarding the impact of advance directives on the documentation of patient's wishes about treatment escalation and resuscitation decision-making.

    “Four systematic reviews reported mixed findings regarding the impact of advance directives on the documentation of patient's wishes about treatment escalation and resuscitation decision-making. 5,9,10,14”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Davidson, J. E., Aslakson, R. A., Long, A. C., Puntillo, K. A., Kross, E. K., Hart, J., Cox, C. E., Wunsch, H., Wickline, M. A., Nunnally, M. E., Netzer, G., Kentish-Barnes, N., Sprung, C. L., Hartog, C. S., Coombs, M., Gerritsen, R. T., Hopkins, R. O., Franck, L. S., Skrobik, Y., Kon, A. A., Scruth, E. A., Harvey, M. A., Lewis-Newby, M., White, D. B., Swoboda, S. M., Cooke, C. R., Levy, M. M., Azoulay, E., & Curtis, J. R.
Affiliations
  • UC San Diego Health System (US)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • University of Washington (US)
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
  • Duke University (US)
  • Sunnybrook Health Science Centre (CA)
  • Johns Hopkins Medicine (US)
  • University of Maryland, Baltimore (US)
  • Famiréa Research Group, Medical Intensive Care, Hôpital Saint Louis, Paris, France.
  • Jena University Hospital (DE)
  • Victoria University of Wellington (NZ)
  • Naval Medical Center San Diego (US)
  • Kaiser Permanente (US)
  • Divisions of Pediatric Cardiac Critical Care Medicine and Pediatric Bioethics, Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington, Seattle Childrens Hospital, Seattle, WA.
  • Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
Venue
Critical Care Medicine
Published
2017-01
Volume
45
Issue
1
Pages
103-128
ISSN
0090-3493 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2560860516
Cited by
1,540
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 159 · 2025: 168 · 2024: 171 · 2023: 159 · 2022: 209 · 2021: 203 · 2020: 188 · 2019: 121 · 2018: 106 · 2017: 52
FWCI
155.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Critical Care Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PEARL (University of Plymouth) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
  • PEARL (University of Plymouth) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Radiological and Ultrasound Technology › Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Infant Development and Preterm Care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine › Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders
Keywords
family-centered care, intensive care unit, family support, family communication, family presence, family support services, patient-centered care, neonatal intensive care unit, pediatric intensive care unit, adult intensive care unit
MeSH terms
Family Relations, Humans, Intensive Care Units, Professional-Family Relations, Patient-Centered Care

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review