Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 18Job Satisfaction and Organizational BehaviorNursing education and managementHealthcare Education and Workforce Issues

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 29 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Professional Flourishing: The Job Demands–Resources Model and Emergency Nursing

Castner, Jessica·2019·Journal of Emergency Nursing

Abstract

Can we craft the perfect job for the next generation of emergency nurses? Ideally, emergency nursing work is engaging, motivating, and meaningful while leading to the nurse’s personal flourishing, wellbeing, optimal health, and performance excellence. Attaining this occupational ideal requires overcoming many contemporary challenges and barriers that emergency nurses face every day. The Job Demands–Resources, or JD–R, model (Figure) is an interdisciplinary theory developed to predict organizational outcomes such as employee well-being, burnout, and work performance. The theory has been tested around the globe for a variety of occupations. In this model, 2 processes occur concurrently, creating a tug-of-war between positive and negative organizational outcomes. On the one hand, job demands, which lead to strain, are the mental and physical requirements that drain employees, increase the risk of health problems, and contribute to worsened work outcomes. On the other hand, job resources are the factors that nurture motivation, leading to improved health and engagement and better work activity. The theory assumes that every occupation or specialty has unique job demands and requires unique resources, which means that the factors leading to an ideal

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jen.2019.09.008

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 18

Metadata

Authors
Castner, J.
Corresponding author
Castner, Jessica
Venue
Journal of Emergency Nursing
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-11
Volume
45
Issue
6
Pages
607-610
ISSN
0099-1767 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2986256279
Cited by
18
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1
FWCI
1.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
  • www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
  • www.elsevier.com/legal/tdmrep-license (tdm)
Locations
  • Journal of Emergency Nursing (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Research and Theory › Nursing education and management
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Leadership and Management › Healthcare Education and Workforce Issues
Keywords
job demands-resources model, emergency nursing, nurse well-being, burnout, employee performance, work engagement
MeSH terms
Burnout, Professional, Humans, Job Satisfaction, Surveys and Questionnaires, Workload, Emergency Nursing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.