Cited by 2Occupational Health and BurnoutHealthcare professionals’ stress and burnoutCOVID-19 and Mental Health

The mental health of emergency nurses exposed to unexpected death: an integrative review

DesJardin, Austin·2025·Journal of Emergency Nursing

Abstract

Background Emergency nurses face high-intensity situations that heighten their risk of mental health concerns, including compassion fatigue and post-traumatic stress symptoms. They report significantly higher levels of depression, anxiety, and secondary stress syndrome than other health care workers, which can negatively affect their well-being and patient care, leading to increased burnout and medical errors. This integrative review aimed to examine the mental health concerns of emergency nurses who care for patients who die unexpectedly.Methods This integrative review followed Whittemore and Knafl's 5-step framework. A narrative synthesis was then completed, and data were analyzed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool to mitigate biases. Four databases were systematically searched with specified search terms and without date restrictions.Results Fifteen studies were included, focusing on clinical events such as traumas, gunshot wounds, and motor vehicle accidents. The themes identified throughout the studies included coping mechanisms, end-of-life care education, and peer and managerial support. Symptoms reported by nurses included avoidance, substance abuse, and sleep disturbances.Conclusion Emergency nurses are vulnerable to the psychological impact of unexpected or traumatic deaths, increasing their risk of mental health concerns that affect their own health and patient outcomes. There is a need for intervention studies to address these issues and improve outcomes for nurses facing unexpected death.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jen.2025.08.006

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Nurses have been reported as experiencing poor psychological outcomes; grief and guilt from exposure to death may be detrimental to their mental health.

    “Nurses have been reported as experiencing poor psychological outcomes; facing death can be challenging, and the grief and guilt of exposure to death may be detrimental to their mental health (DesJardin, 2025; Roche et al., 2025).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
DesJardin, A.
Corresponding author
DesJardin, Austin
Venue
Journal of Emergency Nursing
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2025-11
Volume
51
Issue
6
Pages
1054-1069
ISSN
0099-1767 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4414163572
Cited by
2
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 2
FWCI
3.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Emergency Nursing (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Saint Louis University
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Occupational Health and Burnout
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
Keywords
emergency department nurses, mental health, unexpected death, compassion fatigue, posttraumatic stress symptoms, secondary traumatic stress, burnout, coping strategies, end-of-life education, substance abuse, sleep disorders, trauma care
MeSH terms
Compassion Fatigue, Adaptation, Psychological, Burnout, Professional, Death, Sudden, Humans, Mental Health, Nursing Staff, Hospital, Emergency Nursing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review