The DOI matches its Crossref record; 18 of the 18 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Web-based surveys as an alternative to traditional mail methods
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Primer on Nonmarket Valuation
(2003) · The Economics of Non-Market Goods and Resources · doi:10.1007/978-94-007-0826-6 · Cited by 1,261
Economics of Outdoor Recreation.
Shapiro, P., Clawson, M., & Knetsch, J. L. (1969) · Economica · doi:10.2307/2552395 · Cited by 1,091
Cost-benefit analysis and the environment
(1994) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.32-2244 · Cited by 1,041
Economics of Outdoor Recreation
Toth, S. (1967) · Soil Science · doi:10.1097/00010694-196711000-00016 · Cited by 687
Bateman, I. J., & Willis, K. G. (1999) · UEA Digital Repository (University of East Anglia) · Cited by 637
Berrens, R. P., Bohara, A. K., Jenkins-Smith, H., Silva, C., & Weimer, D. L. (2003) · Political Analysis · doi:10.1093/pan/11.1.1 · Cited by 364
Alternative Non-market Value-Elicitation Methods: Are the Underlying Preferences the Same?
Cameron, T. A., Poe, G. L., Ethier, R. G., & Schulze, W. D. (2002) · Journal of Environmental Economics and Management · doi:10.1006/jeem.2001.1210 · Cited by 261
Nonmarket Valuation of Environmental Resources: An Interpretive Appraisal
Smith, V. K. (1993) · Land Economics · doi:10.2307/3146275 · Cited by 257
Household use of information technology
Queensland (2006) · Cited by 256
Research Methodology: Taming the Cyber Frontier: Techniques for Improving Online Surveys
Kaye, B. K., & Johnson, T. J. (1999) · Social Science Computer Review · doi:10.1177/089443939901700307 · Cited by 230
Cited by
Discrete choice experiments in health economics: a review of the literature
de Bekker‐Grob, E. W., Ryan, M., & Gerard, K. (2012) · Health Economics · doi:10.1002/hec.1697 · Cited by 1,329
Discrete Choice Experiments in Health Economics: A Review of the Literature
Clark, M. D., Determann, D., Petrou, S., Moro, D., & de Bekker-Grob, E. W. (2014) · PharmacoEconomics · doi:10.1007/s40273-014-0170-x · Cited by 851
Web-based Questionnaires: The Future in Epidemiology?
van Gelder, M. M. H. J., Bretveld, R. W., & Roeleveld, N. (2010) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/aje/kwq291 · Cited by 580
Survey response rates: Trends and a validity assessment framework
Holtom, B., Baruch, Y., Aguinis, H., & A Ballinger, G. (2022) · Human Relations · doi:10.1177/00187267211070769 · Cited by 380
Cunha, L. M., Cabral, D., Moura, A. P., & de Almeida, M. D. V. (2018) · Food Quality and Preference · doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2017.10.007 · Cited by 196
Metadata
- Authors
- Fleming, C. M., & Bowden, M.
- Venue
- Journal of Environmental Management
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2009-01
- Volume
- 90
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 284-292
- ISSN
- 0301-4797 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2027053602
- Cited by
- 275
- References
- 18
- FWCI
- 23.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Web-based surveys as an alternative to traditional mail methods. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.09.011
- The paper
- Fleming, C. M., & Bowden, M. (2009). Web-based surveys as an alternative to traditional mail methods. Journal of Environmental Management. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.09.011
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
