Aboriginal/non-Aboriginal relations and sustainable forest management in Canada: the influence of the Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples.
Abstract
This paper provides an overview of the emerging role of Aboriginal people in Sustainable Forest Management (SFM) in Canada over the past decade. The 1996 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples (RCAP) provided guidance and recommendations for improving Aboriginal peoples' position in Canadian society, beginning with strengthening understanding and building relationships between Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal parties. This paper explores the extent to which advances in Aboriginal/non-Aboriginal relationships and Aboriginal forestry have been made as a result of RCAP's call for renewed relationships based on co-existence among nations. Such changes have begun to alter the context in which Aboriginal/non-Aboriginal relationships exist with respect to SFM. While governments themselves have generally not demonstrated the leadership called for by RCAP in taking up these challenges, industry and other partners are demonstrating some improvements. A degree of progress has been achieved in terms of lands and resources, particularly with co-management-type arrangements, but a fundamental re-structuring needed to reflect nation-to-nation relationships has not yet occurred. Other factors related to increasing Aboriginal participation in SFM, such as the recognition of Aboriginal and treaty rights, are also highlighted, along with suggestions for moving Aboriginal peoples' SFM agenda forward in the coming years.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The concept and spirit of the two-row wampum has been suggested as a framework or model for simultaneous intellectual co-existence by Anishinaabe environmental scholar Deborah McGregor.
“The concept and spirit of the two-row wampum has been suggested as a framework or model for simultaneous intellectual co-existence by Anishinaabe environmental scholar Deborah McGregor (see McGregor, 2011; McGregor, 2009; McGregor, 2008)”
From Relational Systems Thinking: That's How Change is Going to Come, From Our Earth Mother (2021) · cites this paper as McGregor, 2011
Cites
Coming Full Circle: Indigenous Knowledge, Environment, and Our Future
McGregor, D. (2004) · The American Indian Quarterly · doi:10.1353/aiq.2004.0101 · Cited by 451 · see citing works
Self-citationO'Flaherty, R. M., Davidson-Hunt, I. J., & Manseau, M. (2008) · Ecology and Society · doi:10.5751/es-02284-130106 · Cited by 147 · see citing works
The Possibility of Difference: Rethinking Co-management
Stevenson, M. G. (2006) · Human Organization · doi:10.17730/humo.65.2.b2dm8thgb7wa4m53 · Cited by 134 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Coombes, B., Johnson, J. T., & Howitt, R. (2012) · Progress in Human Geography · doi:10.1177/0309132511431410 · Cited by 159 · see citing works
Relational Systems Thinking: That's How Change is Going to Come, From Our Earth Mother
Goodchild, M. (2021) · Journal of Awareness-Based Systems Change · doi:10.47061/jabsc.v1i1.577 · Cited by 107 · see citing works
- Authors
- McGregor, D.
- Venue
- Journal of Environmental Management
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2011-02
- Volume
- 92
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 300-310
- ISSN
- 0301-4797
- Cited by
- 30
- References
- 3
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review