Cited by 451Indigenous Studies and EcologyIndigenous Health, Education, and RightsEnvironmental and Cultural Studies in Latin America and Beyond

Coming Full Circle: Indigenous Knowledge, Environment, and Our Future

McGregor, Deborah·2004·The American Indian Quarterly

Abstract

Traditional Ecological Knowledge (TEK) as a construct of broader society is a relatively recent phenomenon, and the field that supports the acquisition of environmental knowledge from Aboriginal people has rapidly grown over the last two decades.1 In part, TEK has emerged from the growing recognition that Indigenous people all over the world developed sustainable environmental knowledge and practices that can be used to address problems that face global society.2 David Suzuki, scientist and environmentalist, writes, "My experience with Aboriginal people convinced me ... of the power and relevance of their knowledge and worldview in a time of imminent global ecocatastrophe."3 The international community has also recognized the important role Indigenous people and their knowledge can play in global society. In 1987 the Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development (or the Brundtland Report) recognized the important role of Indigenous people in sustainable development. Five years later, at the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development, the Convention on Biodiversity (CBD) was signed, one of two legally binding agreements. The CBD reiterated the important role of Indigenous people and their knowledge for achieving sustainable environmental and resource management.4 Canada has responded to the challenges brought forth by the Convention on Biodiversity and the Brundtland Report and is incorporating TEK into various environmental decision-making proces…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1353/aiq.2004.0101

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Indigenous knowledge is situated knowledge that is neither separable from the knowledge holders or keepers nor divisible from the environment in which it is embedded.

    “A critical addition to this definition is that this “situated knowledge” is neither separable from the knowledge holders or keepers, nor is it divisible from the environment in which it is embedded (McGregor, 2004; see glossary: Table 1).”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McGregor, D.
Corresponding author
McGregor, Deborah
Venue
The American Indian Quarterly
Publisher
JSTOR
Published
2004
Volume
28
Issue
3
Pages
385-410
ISSN
  • 0095-182X (ISSN-L)
  • 1534-1828
OpenAlex
W2088413716
Cited by
451
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 29 · 2025: 41 · 2024: 45 · 2023: 44 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 44 · 2020: 37 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 20
FWCI
2.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The American Indian Quarterly (publishedVersion)
  • Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Indigenous Studies and Ecology
  • Social Sciences › Health › Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Environmental and Cultural Studies in Latin America and Beyond
Keywords
traditional ecological knowledge, indigenous knowledge, Aboriginal peoples, knowledge transfer, Eurocentrism, colonialism, environmental management, sustainable development, Brundtland Report, indigenous worldview, environmental decision-making, Canada, Indigenous self-determination

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review