The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Stakeholder analysis combined with social network analysis provides fine-grained insights into water infrastructure planning processes
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification
Freeman, L. C. (1978) · Social Networks · doi:10.1016/0378-8733(78)90021-7 · Cited by 17,062
Social Capital and the Environment
Pretty, J., & Ward, H. (2001) · World Development · doi:10.1016/s0305-750x(00)00098-x · Cited by 1,764
Cited by
Why is China struggling with waste classification? A stakeholder theory perspective
Guo, S., & Chen, L. (2022) · Resources, Conservation and Recycling · doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2022.106312 · Cited by 55
Lienert, J., Andersson, J. C. M., Hofmann, D., Silva Pinto, F., & Kuller, M. (2022) · Hydrology and Earth System Sciences · doi:10.5194/hess-26-2899-2022 · Cited by 26
Self-citationHalder, A. (2024) · Innovative Infrastructure Solutions · doi:10.1007/s41062-024-01521-6 · Cited by 10
Metadata
- Authors
- Lienert, J., Schnetzer, F., & Ingold, K.
- Venue
- Journal of Environmental Management
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2013-08
- Volume
- 125
- Pages
- 134-148
- ISSN
- 0301-4797 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2060958978
- Cited by
- 376
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 125.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
