The DOI matches its Crossref record; 94 of the 94 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Social network analysis of stakeholder governance landscapes in infrastructure mega projects: a case of the Delhi–Mumbai Industrial Corridor project
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(2010) · Cited by 24,023
Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications
Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511815478 · Cited by 17,557
Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification
Freeman, L. C. (1978) · Social Networks · doi:10.1016/0378-8733(78)90021-7 · Cited by 17,062
A Set of Measures of Centrality Based on Betweenness
Freeman, L. C. (1977) · Sociometry · doi:10.2307/3033543 · Cited by 10,295
A Stakeholder Framework for Analyzing and Evaluating Corporate Social Performance
Clarkson, M. B. E. (1995) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1995.9503271994 · Cited by 8,412
Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., & Wood, D. J. (1997) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/259247 · Cited by 5,039
Networks and Organizations: Structure, Form, and Action.
Kadushin, C., Nohria, N., & Eccles, R. G. (1994) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2075362 · Cited by 3,219
Moving beyond Dyadic Ties: A Network Theory of Stakeholder Influences
Rowley, T. J. (1997) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1997.9711022107 · Cited by 2,522
Megaprojects and Risk: An Anatomy of Ambition
Flyvbjerg, B., Bruzelius, N., & Rothengatter, W. (2003) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781107050891 · Cited by 2,482
Provan, K. G., Fish, A., & Sydow, J. (2007) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206307302554 · Cited by 1,743
Research works printed but not linked: 10
- Williams NL, Ferdinand N, Pasian B (2016) Online stakeholder interactions in the early stage of a megaproject. Proj Manag J 46:92–110. https://doi.org/10.1002/pmj · DOI
- Helms R, Ignacio R, Brinkkemper S, Zonneveld A (2010) Limitations of network analysis for studying efficiency and effectiveness of knowledge sharing. Electron J Knowl Manag 8:53–68
- Uddin S (2017) Social network analysis in project management—A case study of analysing stakeholder networks. J Mod Proj Manag 5:106–113
- Sulzenko A, Koch K (2020) Governance options for a Canadian Northern Corridor. Sch Public Policy Publ 13:27
- Luthuli N, Houghton J (2019) Implementing regional economic development : exploring stakeholder engagements and project governance in the formation of the Durban Aerotropolis. J Public Adm 54:677–692
- Anand S, Sami N (2016) Scaling up, scaling down-states rescaling along the Delhi-Mumbai industrial corridor. Econ Polit Wkly L1:50–58
- Singh A (2016) An exploratory study of DMIC water uses. IRA Int J Manag Soc Sci (ISSN 2455-2267) 3:486–498
- Schindler S, Sharma S (2017) Delhi-Mumbai Industrial Corridor: economic and environmental consequences. Econ Polit Wkly 52:12–16
- Yin RK (2003) Case study research design and method, 3rd edn. Sage Publications, California
- Ruan X, Ochieng EG, Price ADF (2011) The evaluation of social network analysis application’s in the UK construction industry. In: 27th annual conference of the association of researchers in construction management, ARCOM 2011. Association of Researchers in Construction Management, Bristol, pp 423–432
Metadata
- Authors
- Halder, A.
- Venue
- Innovative Infrastructure Solutions
- Published
- 2024-05-18
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 6
- ISSN
- 2364-4176
- 2364-4184
- Cited by
- 10
- References
- 94
- Language
- en
- Licence
- www.springernature.com/gp/researchers/text-and-data-mining (tdm)
- www.springernature.com/gp/researchers/text-and-data-mining (vor)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Social network analysis of stakeholder governance landscapes in infrastructure mega projects: a case of the Delhi–Mumbai Industrial Corridor project. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s41062-024-01521-6
- The paper
- Halder, A. (2024). Social network analysis of stakeholder governance landscapes in infrastructure mega projects: a case of the Delhi–Mumbai Industrial Corridor project. Innovative Infrastructure Solutions. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41062-024-01521-6
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
