CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 191Rangeland Management and Livestock EcologyConservation, Biodiversity, and Resource ManagementLand Use and Ecosystem Services

Reorienting land degradation towards sustainable land management: Linking sustainable livelihoods with ecosystem services in rangeland systems

Open access
Reed, M.S., Stringer, L.C., Dougill, A.J., Perkins, J.S., Atlhopheng, J.R., Mulale, K., Favretto, N.·2015·Journal of Environmental Management
DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.11.010
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

This paper identifies new ways of moving from land degradation towards sustainable land management through the development of economic mechanisms. It identifies new mechanisms to tackle land degradation based on retaining critical levels of natural capital whilst basing livelihoods on a wider range of ecosystem services. This is achieved through a case study analysis of the Kalahari rangelands in southwest Botswana. The paper first describes the socio-economic and ecological characteristics of the Kalahari rangelands and the types of land degradation taking place. It then focuses on bush encroachment as a way of exploring new economic instruments (e.g. Payments for Ecosystem Services) designed to enhance the flow of ecosystem services that support livelihoods in rangeland systems. It does this by evaluating the likely impacts of bush encroachment, one of the key forms of rangeland degradation, on a range of ecosystem services in three land tenure types (private fenced ranches, communal grazing areas and Wildlife Management Areas), before considering options for more sustainable land management in these systems. We argue that with adequate policy support, economic mechanisms could help reorient degraded rangelands towards more sustainable land management.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.11.010

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Establishing financial mechanisms for compensating land users for SLM and improved delivery of ecosystem services, e.g., through payments for ecosystem services, could provide a much-needed incentive for increased investment into land restoration and rehabilitation.

    “Establishing financial mechanisms for compensating land users for SLM and improved delivery of ecosystem services, e.g., through payments for ecosystem services, could provide a much-needed incentive for increased investment into land restoration and rehabilitation (111, 127, 128).”

    From Restoring Degraded Lands (2021) · cites this paper as [128]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 38

  1. Rodrik, D. (Ed.), In Search of Prosperity: Analytic Narratives on Economic Growth. Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J, pp. 80e119.
  2. Archer, S., Smeins, F.E., 1991. Ecosystem-level processes. In: Grazing Management: an Ecological Perspective. Timber Press, Portland, OR, pp. 109e139.
  3. Barrow, C.J., 1991. Land Degradation: Development and Breakdown of Terrestrial Environments. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  4. Behnke, R.H.J., Scoones, I. (Eds.), 1993. Range Ecology at Disequilibrium: New Models of Natural Vulnerability and Pastoral Adaptation in African Savannas. Overseas Development Institute, London.
  5. Belay, T.A., Totland, Ø., Moe, S.R., 2013. Ecosystem responses to woody plant encroachment in a semiarid savanna rangeland. Plant Ecol. 214 (10), 1211e1222.
  6. Buss, H.J., Nuppenau, E.A., 2003. Sustainable range use in semi-arid eco-systems through adapted management: a case study on Namibian farms based on bio- economic models. In: Allsopp, N., Palmer, A.R., Milton, S.J., Kirkman, K.P., Kerley, G.I.H., Hurt, C.R., Brown, C.J. (Eds.), Proceedings of the VIIth International Rangelands Congress 26th July -1st August, Durban, South Africa, pp. 1949e1952.
  7. Caviezel, C., Hunziker, M., Schaffner, M., Kuhn, N.J., 2014. Soilevegetation interac- tion on slopes with bush encroachment in the central Alpseadapting slope stability measurements to shifting process domains. Earth Surf. Process. Landforms 39 (4), 509e521.
  8. Dempsey, J., Robertson, M., 2012. Ecosystem services: tensions and developments within neoliberal environmentalism. Prog. Hum. Geogr. 36 (6), 758e779.
  9. Dougill, A.J., Thomas, A.D., 2002. Nebkha dunes in the Molopo Basin, South Africa and Botswana: formation controls and their validity as indicators of soil degradation. J. Arid Environ. 50 (3), 413e428.
  10. Dougill, A.J., Thomas, A.D., 2004. Kalahari sand soils: spatial heterogeneity, bio- logical soil crusts and land degradation. Land Degrad. Dev. 15 (3), 233e242.
  11. Dougill, A.J., Fraser, E.D.G., Reed, M.S., 2010. Anticipating vulnerability in food systems to climate variability and change: challenges of using dynamic sys- tems approaches and the case of pastoral systems in Botswana. Ecol. Soc. 15 (2), 17.
  12. Dougill, A.J., Stringer, L.C., Leventon, J., Riddell, M., Rueff, H., 2012. Lessons from community-based payment for ecosystem service schemes: from Forests to rangelands. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 367, 3178e3190.
  13. Fisher, J.A., Patenaude, G., Meir, P., Nightingale, A.J., Rounsevell, M.D.A., Williams, M., Woodhouse, I.H., 2013. Strengthening conceptual foundations: analysing frameworks for ecosystem services and poverty alleviation research. Glob. Environ. Change 23 (5), 1098e1111.
  14. Hastrup, K., Hervik, P. (Eds.), 2003. Social Experience and Anthropological Knowl- edge. Routledge.
  15. Holling, C.S., 1986. The resilience of terrestrial ecosystems, local surprise and global change. In: Clark, W.C., Mtmn, R.E. (Eds.), Sustainable Development of the Biosphere. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 292e317.
  16. Hudak, A.T., Wessman, C.A., Seastedt, T.R., 2003. Woody overstorey effects on soil carbon and nitrogen pools in South African savanna. Austral Ecol. 28 (2), 173e181.
  17. IPCC (International Panel of Climate Change), 2001. Climate Change 2001: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  18. Jensen, C.L., 1984. Wood use by the Amboseli Maasai. In: Barnes, C., Ensminger, J., O'Keefe, Ph (Eds.), Wood, Energy and Households Perspectives on Rural Kenya, Energy, Environment and Development in Africa Series No. 6. The Beijer Institute/Scandinavian Institute of African Studies, Uppsala, pp. 188e204.
  19. Jones, B.T.B., 2003. Using wildlife and tourism for the diversification of rangeland use in Namibia. In: Allsopp, N., Palmer, A.R., Milton, S.J., Kirkman, K.P., Kerley, G.I.H., Hurt, C.R., Brown, C.J. (Eds.), Proceedings of the VIIth International Rangelands Congress 26th July -1st August, Durban, South Africa, pp. 1635e1643.
  20. Jones, B., Murphree, M., 2001. The evolution of policy on community conservation in Namibia and Zimbabwe. In: Hulme, D., Murphree, M.W. (Eds.), African Wildlife and African Livelihoods: the Promise and Performance of Community Conservation. James Currey, Oxford.
  21. Kenter, J.O., Reed, M.S., Irvine, K.N., O'Brien, E., Brady, E., Bryce, R., Christie, M., Church, A., Cooper, N., Davies, A., Hockley, N., Fazey, I., Jobstvogt, N., Molloy, C., Orchard-Webb, J., Ravenscroft, N., Ryan, M., Watson, V., 2014. UK National Ecosystem Assessment Follow-on Phase, Technical Report: Shared, Plural and Cultural Values of Ecosystems. UNEP-WCMC, Cambridge.
  22. Kraaij, T., Ward, D., 2006. Effects of rain, nitrogen, fire and grazing on tree recruitment and early survival in bush-encroached savanna, South Africa. Plant Ecol. 186 (2), 235e246.
  23. Malope, P., Batisani, N., 2008. Land reforms that exclude the poor: the case of Botswana. Dev. South. Afr. 25 (4), 383e397.
  24. Meik, J.M., Jeo, R.M., Mendelson Iii, J.R., Jenks, K.E., 2002. Effects of bush encroachment on an assemblage of diurnal lizard species in central Namibia. Biol. Conserv. 106 (1), 29e36.
  25. Moleele, N.M., Chanda, R., 2003. The impact of different land use management systems on the vegetation and wildlife communities of the Matsheng area, Kgalagadi North, Botswana. In: Allsopp, N., Palmer, A.R., Milton, S.J., Kirkman, K.P., Kerley, G.I.H., Hurt, C.R., Brown, C.J. (Eds.), Proceedings of the VIIth International Rangelands Congress 26th July -1st August, Durban, South Africa, pp. 436e445.
  26. O'Connor, T.G., Puttick, J.R., Hoffman, M.T., 2014. Bush encroachment in southern Africa: changes and causes. Afr. J. Range Forage Sci. 31 (2), 67e88.
  27. Perkins, J.S., Stuart-Hill, G., Kgabung, B., 2002. The impact of cattle-keeping on the wildlife, vegetation, and Veld products of the kalahari. In: Sporton, D., Thomas, D.S.G. (Eds.), Sustainable Livelihoods in Kalahari Environments. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 66e79.
  28. Ratajczak, Z., Nippert, J.B., Collins, S.L., 2012. Woody encroachment decreases di- versity across North American grasslands and savannas. Ecology 93 (4), 697e703.
  29. Reed, M.S., 2005. Participatory Rangeland Monitoring and Management in the Kalahari (PhD Thesis). School of Earth & Environment, University of Leeds, Botswana.
  30. Scoones, I. (Ed.), Living with Uncertainty: New Directions in Pastoral Development in Af- rica. Intermediate Technology Publications, London, pp. 1e36.
  31. Smit, G.N., 2004. An approach to tree thinning to structure southern African sa- vannas for long-term restoration from bush encroachment. J. Environ. Manag. 71 (2), 179e191.
  32. Stringer, L.C., Thomas, D.S.G., Twyman, C., 2007a. From global politics to local land users: applying the united nations convention to combat desertification in Swaziland. Geogr. J. 173 (2), 129e142.
  33. Stringer, L.C., Dyer, J., Reed, M., Dougill, A., Twyman, C., Mkwambisi, D., 2009a. Adaptations to climate change, drought and desertification: insights to enhance policy in southern Africa. Environ. Sci. Policy 12 (7), 748e765.
  34. Stringer, L.C., Dougill, A.J., Mkwambisi, D.D., Dyer, J.C., Kalaba, F., Mngoli, M., 2012b. Challenges and opportunities for carbon management in Malawi and Zambia. Carbon Manag. 2 (3), 159e173.
  35. Taylor, M., 2003. Trajectories in community based natural resource management in southern africa. In: Proceedings of the Arid Climate Adaptation and Cultural Innovation in Africa Conference. University of Cologne, 1e3 October.
  36. Thomas, A.D., Dougill, A.J., 2007. Spatial and temporal distribution of cyanobacterial soil crusts in the Kalahari: implications for soil surface properties. Geo- morphology 85 (1), 17e29.
  37. UNEP, 1997. In: Middleton, N., Thomas, D.S.G. (Eds.), World Atlas of Desertification, second ed. Edward Arnold, London.
  38. Ward, D., 2005. Do we understand the causes of bush encroachment in African savannas? Afr. J. Range Forage Sci. 22 (2), 101e105.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

  • Restoring Degraded Lands

    Arneth, A., Olsson, L., Cowie, A., Erb, K.-H., Hurlbert, M., Kurz, W. A., Mirzabaev, A., & Rounsevell, M. D. A. (2021) · Annual Review of Environment and Resources · doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-012320-054809 · Cited by 106 · see citing works

    “, through payments for ecosystem services, could provide a much-needed incentive for increased investment into land restoration and rehabilitation (111, 127, 128).”
    Background

Authors
Reed, M. S., Stringer, L. C., Dougill, A. J., Perkins, J. S., Atlhopheng, J. R., Mulale, K., & Favretto, N.
Affiliations
  • Birmingham City University (GB)
  • University of Leeds (GB)
  • University of Botswana (BW)
Corresponding author
Reed, M.S.
ORCID
Venue
Journal of Environmental Management
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-03
Volume
151
Pages
472-485
ISSN
0301-4797 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.11.010
OpenAlex
W2138189674
Cited by
191
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 6
FWCI
44.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Journal of Environmental Management (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (acceptedVersion)
  • BCU Open Access Repository (Birmingham City University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Economics of Land Degradation (ELD) (81163498)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Rangeland Management and Livestock Ecology
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Land Use and Ecosystem Services
Keywords
land degradation, sustainable land management, ecosystem services, sustainable livelihoods, payments for ecosystem services, shrub encroachment, rangeland, Kalahari, land tenure, natural capital, economic instruments, wildlife management areas, ranches
MeSH terms
Agriculture, Animals, Botswana, Conservation of Natural Resources, Humans, Ecosystem

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review