Cited by 375Urban Stormwater Management SolutionsUrban Heat Island MitigationUrban Planning and Landscape Design

Managing urban stormwater for urban sustainability: Barriers and policy solutions for green infrastructure application

Dhakal, Krishna P., Chevalier, Lizette R.·2017·Journal of Environmental Management

Abstract

Green infrastructure (GI) revitalizes vegetation and soil, restores hydro-ecological processes destroyed by traditional urbanization, and naturally manages stormwater on-site, offering numerous sustainability benefits. However, despite being sustainable and despite being the object of unrelenting expert advocacy for more than two decades, GI implementation remains slow. On the other hand, the practice of traditional gray infrastructure, which is known to have significant adverse impacts on the environment, is still ubiquitous in urban areas throughout the world. This relationship between knowledge and practice seems unaccountable, which has not yet received adequate attention from academia, policy makers, or research communities. We deal with this problem in this paper. The specific objective of the paper is to explore the barriers to GI, and suggest policies that can both overcome these barriers and expedite implementation. By surveying the status of implementation in 10 US cities and assessing the relevant city, state and federal policies, we identified 29 barriers and grouped them into 5 categories. The findings show that most of the barriers stem from cognitive limitations and socio-institutional arrangements. Accordingly, we suggest 33 policies, also grouped into 5 categories, which span from conducting public education and awareness programs to changing policies and governance structures.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.07.065

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Stormwater is not recognized as a pollutant in a way that allows local governments to unilaterally take management action on private land even though the municipality bears the responsibility for management via the permitting system.

    “Stormwater is not recognized as a pollutant in a way that allows local governments to unilaterally take management action on private land even though the municipality bears the responsibility for management via the permitting system (Brown et al. 2016;Dhakal and Chevalier 2017;National Association of Clean Water Agencies 2018).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dhakal, K. P., & Chevalier, L. R.
Affiliations
Southern Illinois University Carbondale (US)
Corresponding author
Dhakal, Krishna P.
Venue
Journal of Environmental Management
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-12
Volume
203
Issue
Pt 1
Pages
171-181
ISSN
0301-4797 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2743061930
Cited by
375
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 43 · 2025: 45 · 2024: 57 · 2023: 42 · 2022: 41 · 2021: 70 · 2020: 38 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 1
FWCI
11.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Environmental Management (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Urban Stormwater Management Solutions
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Urban Heat Island Mitigation
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Urban Planning and Landscape Design
Keywords
green infrastructure, urban stormwater management, implementation barriers, urban sustainability policy, grey infrastructure, knowledge-practice gap, cognitive barriers, urban governance, American cities
MeSH terms
Cities, Environment, Research, Urbanization, Environmental Policy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review