Cited by 62Environmental and Social Impact AssessmentsPublic Policy and Administration ResearchCoastal and Marine Management

Recruiting, integrating, and sustaining stakeholder participation in environmental management: A case study from the Great Lakes Areas of Concern

Open access
Holifield, Ryan, Williams, Kathleen C.·2019·Journal of Environmental Management

Abstract

Stakeholder participation is now widely viewed as an essential component of environmental management projects, but limited research investigates how practitioners perceive the major challenges and strategies for implementing high-quality participation. In order to address this gap, we present findings from a survey and interviews conducted with managers and advisory committee leaders in a case study of United States and binational (US and Canada) Great Lakes Areas of Concern. Our findings suggest that recruiting and integrating participants and sustaining participation over the long term present distinctive ongoing challenges that are not fully recognized in existing conceptualizations of the process of implementing participation. For example, it can be difficult to recruit active stakeholders to fill vacant "slots," to integrate distinctive interests and perspectives in decision-making processes, and to keep participants involved when activity is low and less visible. We present strategies that emerged in the survey and interviews for addressing these challenges, emphasizing the building and leveraging of relationships among stakeholders themselves. Such strategies include balancing tight networks with an openness to new members, supplementing formal hearings with social gatherings, making participation socially meaningful, and dividing labor between managers and advisory committees.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.09.081

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Ethical marketing of AI and robotic healthcare solutions ensures that societal expectations align with the capabilities of these technologies, preventing unrealistic or misleading portrayals.

    “Ethical marketing of AI and robotic healthcare solutions ensures that societal expectations align with the capabilities of these technologies, preventing unrealistic or misleading portrayals.[46]”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 39

  1. Adams WM, Perrow MR, Carpenter A 2004 Conservatives and champions: River managers and the river restoration discourse in the United Kingdom. Environment and Planning A, 36(11), 19291942. 10.1068/a3637 · DOI
  2. Arnstein S 1969 A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35 (4), 216-224. 10.1080/01944366908977225 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Baker S, Chapin III FS 2018 Going beyond 'it depends:' The role of context in shaping participation in natural resource management. Ecology and Society, 23(1), Art. 20. 10.5751/ES-09868-230120 · DOI
  4. Beierle TC, Konisky DM 2001 What are we gaining from stakeholder involvement? Observations from environmental planning in the Great Lakes. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 19(4), 515-527. 10.1068/c5s · DOI
  5. Brookfield K, Bloodworth A, Mohan J 2013 Engaging residents' groups in planning using focus groups. In Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Engineering Sustainability (Vol. 166, No. 2, pp. 61-74). Thomas Telford Ltd.
  6. Bryson JM, Quick KS, Slotterback CS, Crosby BC, 2013 Designing public participation processes. Public Administration Review, 73(1). 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2012.02678.x · DOI · Paper page
  7. Colvin RM, Witt GB, Lacey J 2016 Approaches to identifying stakeholders in environmental management: Insights from practitioners to go beyond the 'usual suspects'. Land Use Policy, 52, 266-276. 10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.12.032 · DOI
  8. Danielson S 2016 Participatory approaches in environmental management. In Sarkar D, Datta R, Mukherjee A, Hannigan R (Eds.) An Integrated Approach to Environmental Management, 363-380. Hoboken NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
  9. de Vente J, Reed MS, Stringer LC, Valente S, Newig J 2016 How does the context and design of participatory decision making processes affect their outcomes? Evidence from sustainable land management in global drylands. Ecology and Society, 21(2), Art. 24. 10.5751/ES-08053-210224 · DOI
  10. Fiorino DJ 1990 Citizen participation and environmental risk: A survey of institutional mechanisms. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 15(2), 226-243. 10.1177/016224399001500204 · DOI
  11. Flint RW 2013 Practice of Sustainable Community Development: A Participatory Framework for Change New York: Springer.
  12. Glicken J 2000 Getting stakeholder participation 'right': A discussion of participatory processes and possible pitfalls. Environmental Science & Policy, 3(6), 305-310. 10.1016/ S1462-9011(00)00105-2
  13. Grover VI, Krantzberg G (Eds.). 2012 Great Lakes: Lessons in Participatory Governance Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
  14. Hartig JH, Law N 1994 Institutional frameworks to direct development and implementation of Great Lakes remedial action plans. Environmental Management, 18(6), 855-864. 10.1007/BF02393615 · DOI
  15. Hartig JH, Zarull MA, Heidtke TM, Shah H 1998 Implementing ecosystem-based management: Lessons from the Great Lakes. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 41(1), 45-75. 10.1080/09640569811795 · DOI
  16. Jetoo S, Thorn, Friedman K, Gosman S, & Krantzberg G 2015 Governance and geopolitics as drivers of change in the Great Lakes-St. Lawrence basin. Journal of Great Lakes Research, 41, 108-118. 10.1016/j.jglr.2014.11.011 · DOI
  17. Krantzberg G 2003 Keeping remedial action plans on target: Lessons learned from Collingwood Harbour. Journal of Great Lakes Research, 29(4), 641-651. 10.1016/S0380-1330(03)70467-5 · DOI
  18. Krantzberg G, Creed IF, Friedman KB, Laurent KL, Jackson JA, Brammeier J, Scavia D 2015 Community engagement is critical to achieve a 'thriving and prosperous' future for the Great Lakes-St. Lawrence River basin. Journal of Great Lakes Research, 41, 188-191. 10.1016/j.jglr. 2014.11.015 · DOI
  19. Landre BK, Knuth BA 1993a Success of citizen advisory committees in consensus-based water resources planning in the Great Lakes basin. Society & Natural Resources, 6(3), 229-257. 10.1080/08941929309380823 · DOI
  20. Landre BK, Knuth BA 1993b The role of agency goals and local context in Great Lakes water resources public involvement programs. Environmental Management, 17(2), 153-165. 10.1007/ BF02394686
  21. Luyet V, Schlaepfer R, Parlange MB, Buttler A 2012 A framework to implement stakeholder participation in environmental projects. Journal of Environmental Management, 111, 213-219. 10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.06.026 [PubMed: 22926750] · DOI
  22. MacKenzie SH 1993 Ecosystem management in the Great Lakes: Some observations from three RAP sites. Journal of Great Lakes Research, 19(1), 136-144. 10.1016/S0380-1330(93)71204-6 · DOI
  23. MacKenzie SH 1996 Integrated Resource Planning and Management: The Ecosystem Approach in the Great Lakes Basin Washington, DC: Island Press
  24. Mease LA, Erickson A, Hicks C 2018 Engagement takes a (fishing) village to manage a resource: Principles and practice of effective stakeholder engagement. Journal of Environmental Management, 212, 248-257. 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.02.015 [PubMed: 29438930] · DOI
  25. Mitchell RK, Agle BR, Wood DJ 1997 Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 853-886. 10.5465/amr.1997.9711022105 · DOI · Paper page
  26. Moon J, Flannery W, Revez A 2017 Discourse and practice of participatory flood risk management in Belfast, UK. Land Use Policy, 63, 408-417. 10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.01.037 · DOI
  27. Muldoon P (2012). Governance in the Great Lakes-a regime in transition. Great Lakes: Lessons in Participatory Governance CRC Press, Taylor and Francis Group, Boca Raton, FL, 44-66.
  28. Pahl-Wostl C, Hare M 2004 Processes of social learning in integrated resources management. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 14(3), 193-206. 10.1002/casp.774 · DOI
  29. Reed MS 2008 Stakeholder participation for environmental management: A literature review. Biological Conservation, 141(10), 2417-2431. 10.1016/j.biocon.2008.07.014 · DOI
  30. Reed MS, Graves A, Dandy N, Posthumus H, Hubacek K, Morris J, Prell C, Quinn CH, Stringer LC 2009 Who's in and why? A typology of stakeholder analysis methods for natural resource management. Journal of Environmental Management, 90(5), 1933-1949. 10.1016/j.jenvman. 2009.01.001 [PubMed: 19231064] · DOI
  31. Reed MS, Vella S, Challies E, de Vente J, Frewer L, Hohenwallner-Ries D, Huber T, Neumann R, Oughton E, Sidoli del Ceno J, van Delden H 2018 A theory of participation: what makes stakeholder and public engagement in environmental management work? Restoration Ecology, 26, S7-S17. 10.1111/rec.12541 · DOI
  32. Rowe G, Frewer LJ 2000 Public participation methods: a framework for evaluation. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 25(1), 3-29. 10.1177/016224390002500101 · DOI
  33. Samuelson CD, Vedlitz A, Whitten GD, Matlock M, Alston LT, Peterson TR, Gilbertz SJ 2005 Citizen participation and representation in collaborative engagement processes. In Sabatier PA, Focht W, Lubell M, Trachtenberg Z, Vedlitz A, Matlock M, Kraft M, Kamieniecki S (Eds.) Swimming upstream: Collaborative approaches to watershed management, 137-170. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  34. Sproule-Jones M 2002 Restoration of the Great Lakes: Promises, Practices, Performances Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.
  35. Staddon SC, Nightingale A, Shrestha SK 2015 Exploring participation in ecological monitoring in Nepal's community forests. Environmental Conservation, 42(3), 268-277. 10.1017/ S037689291500003X
  36. Valerio MA, Rodriguez N, Winkler P, Lopez J, Dennison M, Liang Y, Turner BJ 2016 Comparing two sampling methods to engage hard-to-reach communities in research priority setting. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 16(1), 146 10.1186/s12874-016-0242-z. [PubMed: 27793191] · DOI
  37. Van Asselt MBA, Mellors J, Rijkens-Klomp N, Greeuw SCH, Molendijk KGP, Beers PJ, Van Notten P 2001 Building blocks for participation in integrated assessment: A review of participatory methods International Centre for Integrated Studies (ICIS), Maastricht.
  38. Williams KC 2015 Building bridges in the Great Lakes: How objects and organization facilitate collaboration across boundaries. Journal of Great Lakes Research, 41, 180-187. 10.1016/j.jglr. 2014.10.004 · DOI
  39. Yin RK 2014 Case Study Research Design and Methods (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Holifield, R., & Williams, K. C.
Affiliations
  • University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee (US)
  • Environmental Protection Agency (US)
Corresponding author
Holifield, Ryan
Venue
Journal of Environmental Management
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-01
Volume
230
Pages
422-433
ISSN
0301-4797 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2895525696
Cited by
62
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5
FWCI
4.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Environmental Management (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Environmental and Social Impact Assessments
  • Social Sciences › Public Administration › Public Policy and Administration Research
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Coastal and Marine Management
Keywords
stakeholder engagement, environmental management, Great Lakes Areas of Concern, stakeholder recruitment, stakeholder integration, advisory committee, binational cooperation, stakeholder relations, decision-making, community participation
MeSH terms
Stakeholder Participation, Canada, Decision Making, Humans, Leadership, United States, Lakes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review