The Capital Structure Puzzle
Open accessAbstract
The finance and economics literature has at least three "managerial" strands: (1) descriptions of managerial capitalism, in which the separation of ownership and control is taken as a central fact of life, for example Berle and Means [5]; (2) agency theory, pioneered for finance by Jensen and Meckling [18], and (3) the detailed analysis of the personal risks and rewards facing managers and how their responses affect firms' financing or investment choices.For examples of Strand (3), see Ross's articles on financial signalling [36, 37]. 2 Put forward in "Debt and Taxes," [27], esp.pp.272-273.Note that Miller did not claim that all of firms' financing habits are neutral mutations, only that some of them may be.I doubt that Miller intended this idea as a strict null hypothesis (see below).
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
6 of 25 cited sources checked · 4 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation§ The Journal of Finance
Firms holding valuable intangible assets or growth opportunities tend to borrow less than firms holding mostly tangible assets.
“Firms holding valuable intangible assets or growth opportunities tend to borrow less than firms holding mostly tangible assets.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites Long and Malitz [21] 21. Long, M. S., and E. B. Malitz, "Investment Patterns and Financial Leverage," Working Paper, National Bureau of Economic Research, 1983. source
- cites Williamson [41] 41. Williamson, S., "The Moral Hazard Theory of Corporate Financial Structure: An Empirical Test," Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, MIT, 1981.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation§ The Journal of Finance
In Miller's theory, personal income taxes on interest payments would exactly offset the corporate interest tax shield, provided the firm pays the full statutory tax rate.
“In Miller's theory, the personal income taxes on interest payments would exactly offset the corporate interest tax shield, provided that the firm pays the full statutory tax rate.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [27] 27. Miller, M., "Debt and Taxes," Journal of Finance, 32 (May 1977), 261-275. source
In “Market Equilibrium and the Behavior of Firms and Individuals” (page unavailable), Miller says personal taxes on bond interest can offset the corporate benefit of deductible interest, and that the offset is one-for-one when the relevant tax rates satisfy a specified relationship. Paying the full statutory corporate tax rate alone does not establish that relationship; the personal tax rates on bond and stock income also matter. (LLM, conf=0.87)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisereasoning§ The Journal of Finance
In Miller's model, since the equilibrium only determines aggregates, debt policy should not matter for any single taxpaying firm.
“However, since the equilibrium only determines aggregates, debt policy should not matter for any single taxpaying firm.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [27] 27. Miller, M., "Debt and Taxes," Journal of Finance, 32 (May 1977), 261-275. source
- Premisecitation§ The Journal of Finance
Risky firms tend to borrow less, other things equal.
“Risky firms tend to borrow less, other things equal.For example, both Long and Malitz [21] and Williamson [41] found significant negative relationships between unlevered betas and the level of borrowing.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites Long and Malitz [21] 21. Long, M. S., and E. B. Malitz, "Investment Patterns and Financial Leverage," Working Paper, National Bureau of Economic Research, 1983. source
Table 6 reports a negative coefficient for unlevered beta (−0.099, t-statistic 7.62), and the Empirical Results section says its effect on leverage is negative. But that section also reports a significant positive relationship between total risk and leverage, so the broader claim that risky firms generally borrow less is not supported without specifying the risk measure. (LLM, conf=0.89)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites Williamson [41] 41. Williamson, S., "The Moral Hazard Theory of Corporate Financial Structure: An Empirical Test," Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, MIT, 1981.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning§ The Journal of Finance
If adjustment costs are small and firms stay near their target debt ratios, the observed diversity of capital structures across firms that seem similar in a static tradeoff framework is hard to understand.
“Then if adjustment costs are small, and firms stay near their target debt ratios, I find it hard to understand the observed diversity of capital structures across firms that seem similar in a static tradeoff framework.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- Premisereasoning§ The Journal of Finance
Extensive trading of depreciation tax shields and investment tax credits through financial leases and other devices proves that plenty of firms face low marginal rates.
“The extensive trading of depreciation tax shields and investment tax credits, through financial leases and other devices, proves that plenty of firms face low marginal rates.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ The Journal of Finance
Miller's model allows explaining the dispersion of actual debt policies without introducing non-value-maximizing managers.
“Thus Miller's model allows us to explain the dispersion of actual debt policies without having to introduce non-value-maximizing managers.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ Costs of adjustment.
Firms cannot immediately offset random events that bump them away from the optimum, so there should be cross-sectional dispersion of actual debt ratios across a sample of firms having the same target ratio.
“Firms can not immediately offset the random events that bump them away from the optimum, so there should be some cross-sectional dispersion of actual debt ratios across a sample of firms having the same target ratio.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ The Journal of Finance
The assumption that all firms face approximately the same marginal tax rate can be immediately rejected.
“and that is an assumption we can immediately reject.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ The Journal of Finance
Miller's explanation works only if all firms face approximately the same marginal tax rate.
“Trouble is, this explanation works only if we assume that all firms face approximately the same marginal tax rate”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given§ Abstract
The pecking order theory performs at least as well as the static tradeoff theory in explaining actual financing choices and their average impacts on stock prices.
“I will argue that this theory performs at least as well as the static tradeoff theory in explaining what we know about actual financing choices and their average impacts on stock prices.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ Conclusion
The firm may choose to reduce these costs by issuing stock now even if new equity is not needed immediately to finance real investment, just to move the firm down the pecking order.
“The firm may choose to reduce these costs by issuing stock now even if new equity is not needed immediately to finance real investment, just to move the firm down the pecking order.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ Conclusion
The firm won't go out of its way to issue debt and retire equity to achieve a more normal debt ratio.
“It won't go out of its way to issue debt and retire equity to achieve a more normal debt ratio.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation§ Conclusion
Recent work based on asymmetric information gives predictions roughly in line with the pecking order theory.
“However, recent work based on asymmetric information gives predictions roughly in line with the pecking order theory.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [34] 34. Myers, S., and N. Majluf, "Corporate Financing and Investment Decisions When Firms Have Information Investors Do Not Have," Journal of Financial Economics, forthcoming.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation§ Conclusion
The bulk of required external financing came from borrowing.
“The bulk of required external financing came from borrowing.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [7] 7. Brealey, R. A. and S. C. Myers, Principles of Corporate Finance, 2nd Ed., McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York, 1984.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning§ The Journal of Finance
The average stock price impact of high-grade debt issues will be small relative to the average impact of stock issues.
“it seems reasonable to predict that the average stock price impact of high-grade debt issues will be small relative to the average impact of stock issues.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ Conclusion
If the pecking order story is right, average debt ratios will vary from industry to industry because asset risk, asset type, and requirements for external funds vary by industry.
“If this story is right, average debt ratios will vary from industry to industry, because asset risk, asset type, and requirements for external funds also vary by industry.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ The Journal of Finance
Williamson found that the higher a firm's proxy for intangibles and growth opportunities, the less the firm's debt-to-value ratio.
“His proxy for a firm's intangibles and growth opportunities was the difference between the market value of its debt and equity securities and the replacement cost of its tangible assets.The higher this proxy, he found, the less the firm's debt-to-value ratio.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Williamson [41] 41. Williamson, S., "The Moral Hazard Theory of Corporate Financial Structure: An Empirical Test," Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, MIT, 1981.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning§ Conclusion
The firm may rationally issue stock to acquire financial slack.
“In other words, financial slack (liquid assets or reserve borrowing power) is valuable, and the firm may rationally issue stock to acquire it.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ Conclusion
Financial slack (liquid assets or reserve borrowing power) is valuable.
“In other words, financial slack (liquid assets or reserve borrowing power) is valuable, and the firm may rationally issue stock to acquire it.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ Conclusion
Firms holding tangible assets-in-place having active second-hand markets will borrow less than firms holding specialized, intangible assets or valuable growth opportunities.
“Firms holding tangible assets-in-place having active second-hand markets will borrow less than firms holding specialized, intangible assets or valuable growth opportunities.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ The Journal of Finance
The simple asymmetric information model used to motivate the pecking order hypothesis predicts that the announcement of a stock issue will cause stock price to fall.
“The simple asymmetric information model I used to motivate the pecking order hypothesis does predict that the announcement of a stock issue will cause stock price to fall.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: Managers have special information that investors do not have.
- Premisecitation§ Conclusion
Net new stock issues were never more than 6 percent of external financing.
“Net new stock issues were never more than 6 percent of external financing.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [7] 7. Brealey, R. A. and S. C. Myers, Principles of Corporate Finance, 2nd Ed., McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York, 1984.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning§ Conclusion
Specialized, intangible assets or growth opportunities are more likely to lose value in financial distress.
“Specialized, intangible assets or growth opportunities are more likely to lose value in financial distress.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationnone given§ The Journal of Finance
The simple asymmetric information model predicts that stock price should not fall, other things equal, if default-risk debt is issued.
“It also predicts that stock price should not fall, other things equal, if default-risk debt is issued.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: Managers have special information that investors do not have.
- Interpretationreasoning§ Conclusion
Safe firms ought to be able to borrow more before expected costs of financial distress offset the tax advantages of borrowing.
“Since costs of financial distress are caused by threatened or actual default, safe firms ought to be able to borrow more before expected costs of financial distress offset the tax advantages of borrowing.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ Conclusion
A long-run industry average debt ratio will not be a meaningful target for individual firms in that industry.
“But a long-run industry average will not be a meaningful target for individual firms in that industry.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given§ Conclusion
Actual debt ratios vary widely across apparently similar firms.
“Actual debt ratios vary widely across apparently similar firms.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ Conclusion
Sticky dividend policies, plus unpredictable fluctuations in profitability and investment opportunities, mean that internally-generated cash flow may be more or less than investment outlays.
“Sticky dividend policies, plus unpredictable fluctuations in profitability and investment opportunities, mean that internally-generated cash flow may be more or less than investment outlays.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ Conclusion
Since target dividend payout ratios are sticky and investment opportunities fluctuate relative to internal cash flow, the firm will from time to time exhaust its ability to issue safe debt.
“Since target dividend payout ratios are sticky, and investment opportunities fluctuate relative to internal cash flow, the firm will from time to time exhaust its ability to issue safe debt.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ Conclusion
Given that external finance was needed, managers rarely thought of issuing stock.
“Given that external finance was needed, managers rarely thought of issuing stock:”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [13] 13. Donaldson, G., Corporate Debt Capacity: A Study of Corporate Debt Policy and the Determination of Corporate Debt Capacity, Boston, Division of Research, Harvard Graduate School of Business Administration, 1961.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning§ The Journal of Finance
The evidence on exchanges hardly builds confidence in the static tradeoff theory as a description of financing behavior.
“The evidence on exchanges hardly builds confidence in the static tradeoff theory as a description of financing behavior.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ Conclusion
If management acts this way, its decision to issue will signal bad news to both old and new shareholders.
“But if management acts this way, its decision to issue will signal bad news to both old and new shareholders.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The firm's manager knows x and y, while investors in capital markets do not and see only a joint distribution of possible values (x, y).
- The authors state this as an assumption: Aside from the information asymmetry, capital markets are perfect and semi-strong form efficient.
- The authors state this as an assumption: MM's Proposition I holds in the sense that the stock of debt relative to real assets is irrelevant if information available to investors is held constant.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The information asymmetry is taken as given.
- Interpretationnone given§ Conclusion
The manager will issue and invest when y is greater than or equal to ΔN.
“Then the manager will issue and invest when y 2 AN.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The firm's manager knows x and y, while investors in capital markets do not and see only a joint distribution of possible values (x, y).
- The authors state this as an assumption: Aside from the information asymmetry, capital markets are perfect and semi-strong form efficient.
- The authors state this as an assumption: MM's Proposition I holds in the sense that the stock of debt relative to real assets is irrelevant if information available to investors is held constant.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The information asymmetry is taken as given.
- Interpretationreasoning§ The Journal of Finance
There is plenty of indirect evidence indicating that the level of borrowing is determined not just by the value and risk of the firm's assets, but also by the type of assets it holds.
“There is plenty of indirect evidence indicating that the level of borrowing is determined not just by the value and risk of the firm's assets, but also by the type of assets it holds.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ The Journal of Finance
If the manager with superior information acts to maximize the intrinsic value of existing shares, then the announcement of a stock issue should be bad news, other things equal, because stock issues will be more likely when the manager receives bad news.
“If the manager with superior information acts to maximize the intrinsic value of existing shares, then the announcement of a stock issue should be bad news, other things equal, because stock issues will be more likely when the manager receives bad news.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: Managers have special information that investors do not have.
- Premisereasoning§ Conclusion
Costs of financial distress exist.
“We know these costs exist, although we may debate their magnitude.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ The Journal of Finance
Dann and Mikkleson find that the average stock price impact of high-grade debt issues is small relative to the average impact of stock issues.
“This is what Dann and Mikkleson [10] find.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Dann and Mikkleson [10] 10. Dann, L. Y. and W. H. Mikkleson, "Convertible Debt Issuance, Capital Structure Change and Financing-Related Information: Some New Evidence," Working Paper, Amos Tuck School of Business Administration, 1983. source
- Premisecitation§ Conclusion
Firms prefer internal finance.
“Firms prefer internal finance.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [13] 13. Donaldson, G., Corporate Debt Capacity: A Study of Corporate Debt Policy and the Determination of Corporate Debt Capacity, Boston, Division of Research, Harvard Graduate School of Business Administration, 1961.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning§ Conclusion
If the inside information is favorable, the firm may pass up a positive-NPV investment opportunity rather than issue undervalued shares.
“If the inside information is favorable, however, the firm may pass up a positive-NPV investment opportunity rather than issue undervalued shares.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The firm's manager knows x and y, while investors in capital markets do not and see only a joint distribution of possible values (x, y).
- The authors state this as an assumption: Aside from the information asymmetry, capital markets are perfect and semi-strong form efficient.
- The authors state this as an assumption: MM's Proposition I holds in the sense that the stock of debt relative to real assets is irrelevant if information available to investors is held constant.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The information asymmetry is taken as given.
- Interpretationreasoning§ Conclusion
Risky firms ought to borrow less, other things equal.
“Risky firms ought to borrow less, other things equal.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ Conclusion
Each firm's observed debt ratio reflects its cumulative requirements for external finance.
“Each firm's observed debt ratio reflects its cumulative requirements for external finance.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ Conclusion
If internally-generated cash flow is less than investment outlays, the firm first draws down its cash balance or marketable securities portfolio.
“If it is less, the firm first draws down its cash balance or marketable securities portfolio.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [13] 13. Donaldson, G., Corporate Debt Capacity: A Study of Corporate Debt Policy and the Determination of Corporate Debt Capacity, Boston, Division of Research, Harvard Graduate School of Business Administration, 1961.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning§ Conclusion
When the firm exhausts its ability to issue safe debt, it turns to less risky securities first, for example, risky debt or convertibles before common stock.
“When this happens, the firm turns to less risky securities first-for example, risky debt or convertibles before common stock.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ Conclusion
In the modified pecking order story, observed debt ratios reflect the cumulative requirement for external financing, cumulated over an extended period.
“The crucial difference between this and the static tradeoff story is that, in the modified pecking order story, observed debt ratios will reflect the cumulative requirement for external financing-a requirement cumulated over an extended period.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ Conclusion
In the pecking order story, there is no well-defined target debt-equity mix, because there are two kinds of equity, internal and external, one at the top of the pecking order and one at the bottom.
“In this story, there is no well-defined target debt-equity mix, because there are two kinds of equity, internal and external, one at the top of the pecking order and one at the bottom.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ Conclusion
Firms set target dividend payout ratios so that normal rates of equity investment can be met by internally generated funds.
“They set target dividend payout ratios so that normal rates of equity investment can be met by internally generated funds.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation§ The Journal of Finance
Marsh and Taggart have found some evidence that firms adjust towards a target debt-to-value ratio.
“Marsh [22] and Taggart [39] have found some evidence that firms adjust towards a target debt-to-value ratio.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Marsh [22] 22. Marsh, P. R., "The Choice Between Equity and Debt: An Empirical Study," Journal of Finance, 37 (March 1982), 121-144.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Taggart [39] 39. Taggart, R., "A Model of Corporate Financing Decisions," Journal of Finance, 32 (December 1977), 1467-1484. source
- Interpretationreasoning§ Conclusion
The firm may plan to cover part of normal investment outlays with new borrowing, but it tries to restrain itself enough to keep the debt safe, that is, reasonably close to default-risk free.
“The firm may also plan to cover part of normal investment outlays with new borrowing, but it tries to restrain itself enough to keep the debt safe-that is, reasonably close to default-risk free.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given§ Conclusion
An unprofitable firm in the same industry will end up with a relatively high debt ratio.
“An unprofitable firm in the same industry will end up with a relatively high debt ratio.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ Conclusion
Firms have good reasons to avoid having to finance real investment by issuing common stock or other risky securities.
“Firms have good reasons to avoid having to finance real investment by issuing common stock or other risky securities.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation§ Conclusion
For all non-financial corporations over the decade 1973-1982, internally generated cash covered, on average, 62 percent of capital expenditures, including investment in inventory and other current assets.
“For all non-financial corporations over the decade 1973-1982, internally generated cash covered, on average, 62 percent of capital expenditures, including investment in inventory and other current assets.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [7] 7. Brealey, R. A. and S. C. Myers, Principles of Corporate Finance, 2nd Ed., McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York, 1984.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning§ Conclusion
The factors that make financial distress costly also make it difficult to escape.
“The factors that make financial distress costly also make it difficult to escape.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ Conclusion
This cost is avoided if the firm can retain enough internally-generated cash to cover its positive-NPV opportunities.
“This cost is avoided if the firm can retain enough internally-generated cash to cover its positive-NPV opportunities.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ Conclusion
Firms in financial distress often do not rebalance their capital structures.
“This is why firms in financial distress often do not rebalance their capital structures.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ Conclusion
The gain in firm value from rebalancing is highest when the firm has gotten into deep trouble and lenders have absorbed a significant capital loss.
“The gain in firm value from rebalancing is highest when the firm has gotten into deep trouble and lenders have absorbed a significant capital loss.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ Conclusion
New stock issues play a relatively small part in financing aggregate investment outlays.
“New stock issues play a relatively small part.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [7] 7. Brealey, R. A. and S. C. Myers, Principles of Corporate Finance, 2nd Ed., McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York, 1984.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation§ Conclusion
Aggregate investment outlays are predominantly financed by debt issues and internally-generated funds.
“Aggregate investment outlays are predominantly financed by debt issues and internally-generated funds.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [7] 7. Brealey, R. A. and S. C. Myers, Principles of Corporate Finance, 2nd Ed., McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York, 1984.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning§ Conclusion
Investors would effectively force the firm to follow a pecking order.
“Thus investors would effectively force the firm to follow a pecking order.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ Conclusion
The firm which borrows against intangibles or growth opportunities may end up reducing their value.
“But the firm which borrows against intangibles or growth opportunities may end up reducing their value.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ Conclusion
The securities of growth firms may be excellent collateral.
“The securities of growth firms may be excellent collateral.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ Conclusion
Asymmetric information creates the possibility of a different sort of cost: the possibility that the firm will choose not to issue, and will therefore pass up a positive-NPV investment.
“Asymmetric information creates the possibility of a different sort of cost: the possibility that the firm will choose not to issue, and will therefore pass up a positive-NPV investment.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The firm's manager knows x and y, while investors in capital markets do not and see only a joint distribution of possible values (x, y).
- The authors state this as an assumption: Aside from the information asymmetry, capital markets are perfect and semi-strong form efficient.
- The authors state this as an assumption: MM's Proposition I holds in the sense that the stock of debt relative to real assets is irrelevant if information available to investors is held constant.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The information asymmetry is taken as given.
- Interpretationreasoning§ Conclusion
If the firm does seek external funds, it is better off issuing debt than equity securities.
“If the firm does seek external funds, it is better off issuing debt than equity securities.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The firm's manager knows x and y, while investors in capital markets do not and see only a joint distribution of possible values (x, y).
- The authors state this as an assumption: Aside from the information asymmetry, capital markets are perfect and semi-strong form efficient.
- The authors state this as an assumption: MM's Proposition I holds in the sense that the stock of debt relative to real assets is irrelevant if information available to investors is held constant.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The information asymmetry is taken as given.
- Interpretationreasoning§ Conclusion
In that case, rebalancing gives lenders a windfall gain.
“In that case, rebalancing gives lenders a windfall gain.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ Conclusion
The problem is not that intangibles and growth opportunities are risky.
“The problem is not that intangibles and growth opportunities are risky.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 13
- May combine two claims. 24
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Premisecitation§ The Journal of FinanceMiller's model describes an equilibrium of aggregate supply and demand for corporate debt in which personal income taxes paid by the marginal investor in corporate debt just offset the corporate tax saving.
“Miller described an equilibrium of aggregate supply and demand for corporate debt, in which personal income taxes paid by the marginal investor in corporate debt just offset the corporate tax saving.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [27] 27. Miller, M., "Debt and Taxes," Journal of Finance, 32 (May 1977), 261-275. source
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ The Journal of FinanceLong and Malitz found a significant negative relationship between rates of investment in advertising and R&D and the level of borrowing, and a significant positive relationship between the rate of capital expenditure in fixed plant and equipment and the level of borrowing.
“For example, Long and Malitz [21] found a significant negative relationship between rates of investment in advertising and research and development (R & D) and the level of borrowing.They also found a significant positive relationship between the rate of capital expenditure (in fixed plant and equipment) and the level of borrowing.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Long and Malitz [21] 21. Long, M. S., and E. B. Malitz, "Investment Patterns and Financial Leverage," Working Paper, National Bureau of Economic Research, 1983. source
May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ The Journal of FinanceAny firm paying a lower than full statutory tax rate would see a net loss to corporate borrowing and a net gain to lending under Miller's theory.
“However, any firm paying a lower rate would see a net loss to corporate borrowing and a net gain to lending.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone given§ AbstractOur theories do not seem to explain actual financing behavior.
“But our theories don't seem to explain actual financing behavior, and it seems presumptuous to advise firms on optimal capital structure when we are so far from explaining actual decisions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone given§ Costs of adjustment.There must be costs, and therefore lags, in adjusting to the optimal debt ratio.
“However, there must be costs, and therefore lags, in adjusting to the optimum.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ AbstractStock prices respond to unanticipated dividend changes, so dividends have information content.
“We know stock prices respond to unanticipated dividend changes, so it is clear that dividends have information content-this observation dates back at least to Miller and Modigliani (MM) in 1961 [28].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [28] 28. Miller, M., and F. Modigliani, "Dividend Policy, Growth and the Valuation of Shares," Journal of Business, 34 (October 1961), 411-433. "Some Estimates of the Cost of Capital to the Electric Utility Industry, 1954-1957," American Economic Review, 56 (June 1966), 333-391. source
May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ The Journal of FinanceThe timing fact is embarrassing to static tradeoff advocates because if firm value rises, the debt-to-value ratio falls, and firms ought to issue debt, not equity, to rebalance their capital structures.
“This fact is embarassing to static tradeoff advocates.If firm value rises, the debt-to-value ratio falls, and firms ought to issue debt, not equity, to rebalance their capital structures.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ The Journal of FinanceThe net tax gain from corporate borrowing varies across firms; for some firms it is close to 46 cents, while for firms with large unused loss carryforwards the expected realizable tax shield is positive but small.
“For some firms this number is 46 cents, or close to it.At the other extreme, there are firms with large unused loss carryforwards which pay no immediate taxes.An extra dollar of interest paid by these firms would create only a potential future deduction, usable when and if the firm earns enough to work off prior carryforwards.The expected realizable tax shield is positive but small.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone given§ Costs of adjustment.If there were no costs of adjustment and the static tradeoff theory is correct, then each firm's observed debt-to-value ratio should be its optimal ratio.
“If there were no costs of adjustment, and the static tradeoff theory is correct, then each firm's observed debt-to-value ratio should be its optimal ratio.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ The Journal of FinanceGiven significant differences in effective marginal tax rates, and given that the static tradeoff theory works, we would expect to find a strong tax effect in any cross-sectional test.
“Given significant differences in effective marginal tax rates, and given that the static tradeoff theory works, we would expect to find a strong tax effect in any cross-sectional test, regardless of whose theory of debt and taxes you believe.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ ConclusionAs a firm climbs up the pecking order, it faces higher odds of incurring costs of financial distress and higher odds that future positive-NPV projects will be passed by because the firm will be unwilling to finance them by issuing common stock or other risky securities.
“Thus the firm faces two increasing costs as it climbs up the pecking order: it faces higher odds of incurring costs of financial distress, and also higher odds that future positive-NPV projects will be passed by because the firm will be unwilling to finance them by issuing common stock or other risky securities.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ The Journal of FinanceMasulis has shown that stock prices rise, on average, when a firm offers to exchange debt for equity, and fall when they offer to exchange equity for debt.
“Masulis [23,24] has shown that stock prices rise, on average, when a firm offers to exchange debt for equity, and fall when they offer to exchange equity for debt.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Masulis [23,24]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ ConclusionEither firms take extended excursions from their targets, or the targets themselves depend on factors not yet recognized or understood.
“Either firms take extended excursions from their targets, or the targets themselves depend on factors not yet recognized or understood.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationnone given§ The Journal of FinanceThe evidence on risk and debt policy is not extensive enough to be totally convincing.
“However, the evidence on risk and debt policy is not extensive enough to be totally convincing.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ ConclusionFirms adapt their target dividend payout ratios to their investment opportunities, although dividends are sticky and target payout ratios are only gradually adjusted to shifts in the extent of valuable investment opportunities.
“They adapt their target dividend payout ratios to their investment opportunities, although dividends are sticky and target payout ratios are only gradually adjusted to shifts in the extent of valuable investment opportunities.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [13] 13. Donaldson, G., Corporate Debt Capacity: A Study of Corporate Debt Policy and the Determination of Corporate Debt Capacity, Boston, Division of Research, Harvard Graduate School of Business Administration, 1961.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ The Journal of FinanceOn average, stock price falls when firms announce a stock issue, and stock prices rise, on average, when a stock repurchase is announced.
“On average, stock price falls when firms announce a stock issue.Stock prices rise, on average, when a stock repurchase is announced.This fact has been confirmed in several studies, including those by Korwar [11].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Korwar [11]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone given§ The Journal of FinanceI know of no study clearly demonstrating that a firm's tax status has predictable, material effects on its debt policy.
“I know of no study clearly demonstrating that a firm's tax status has predictable, material effects on its debt policy.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ ConclusionAn unusually profitable firm in an industry generating relatively slow growth will end up with an unusually low debt ratio compared to its industry's average, and it won't do much of anything about it.
“For example, think of an unusually profitable firm in an industry generating relatively slow growth.That firm will end up with an unusually low debt ratio compared to its industry's average, and it won't do much of anything about it.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ The Journal of FinanceA model based solely on the partial adjustment process would have a very low R2, so the static tradeoff model captures only a small part of actual behavior.
“However, a model based solely on this partial adjustment process would have a very low R2.Apparently the static tradeoff model captures only a small part of actual behavior.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.
Interpretationcitation§ The Journal of FinanceThese results may make one a bit more comfortable with asymmetric information models of the kind sketched above, and thus a bit more comfortable with the pecking order story.
“These results may make one a bit more comfortable with asymmetric information models of the kind sketched above, and thus a bit more comfortable with the pecking order story.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone given§ ConclusionThere is no satisfactory explanation of debt covenants unless agency costs and moral hazard problems are recognized.
“For example, there is no satisfactory explanation of debt covenants unless agency costs and moral hazard problems are recognized.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ The Journal of FinanceBook values reflect assets-in-place (tangible assets and working capital), while market values reflect intangibles and growth opportunities as well as assets-in-place.
“Book values reflect assets-in-place (tangible assets and working capital).Market values reflect intangibles and growth opportunities as well as assets-in-place.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone given§ ConclusionThe modified pecking order story is generally consistent with the empirical evidence.
“But I think it is generally consistent with the empirical evidence.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisenone given§ ConclusionCosts of financial distress include the legal and administrative costs of bankruptcy, as well as the subtler agency, moral hazard, monitoring and contracting costs which can erode firm value even if formal default is avoided.
“Costs of financial distress include the legal and administrative costs of bankruptcy, as well as the subtler agency, moral hazard, monitoring and contracting costs which can erode firm value even if formal default is avoided.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone given§ ConclusionIssue costs in themselves do not seem large enough to override the costs and benefits of leverage emphasized in the static tradeoff story.
“But issue costs in themselves do not seem large enough to override the costs and benefits of leverage emphasized in the static tradeoff story.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ ConclusionThe firm restrains its borrowing for two reasons: to avoid material costs of financial distress and to maintain financial slack in the form of reserve borrowing power.
“It restrains itself for two reasons: first, to avoid any material costs of financial distress; and second, to maintain financial slack in the form of reserve borrowing power.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone given§ ConclusionFirms do not want to run the risk of falling into the dilemma of either passing by positive-NPV projects or issuing stock at a price they think is too low.
“They do not want to run the risk of falling into the dilemma of either passing by positive-NPV projects or issuing stock at a price they think is too low.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone given§ The Journal of FinanceAny time an announcement affects stock price, we can infer that the announcement conveyed information.
“Any time an announcement affects stock price, we can infer that the announcement conveyed information.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ ConclusionThe static tradeoff story works to some extent, but it seems to have an unacceptably low R2.
“The static tradeoff story works to some extent, but it seems to have an unacceptably low R2.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ The Journal of FinanceFirms do not set target book debt ratios because accountants certify the books; book asset values are proxies for the values of assets in place.
“Thus, firms do not set target book debt ratios because accountants certify the books.Book asset values are proxies for the values of assets in place.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ The Journal of FinanceMany firms have market values far in excess of book values, yet we do not see at least a few such firms operating comfortably at very high book debt ratios.
“Since many firms have market values far in excess of book values (even if those book values are restated in current dollars), we ought to see at least a few such firms operating comfortably at very high book debt ratios-and of course we do not.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ ConclusionAlthough theories tell different stories about aggregate supply and demand of corporate debt, they make essentially the same predictions about which firms borrow more or less than average.
“Thus, although the theories tell different stories about aggregate supply and demand of corporate debt, they make essentially the same predictions about which firms borrow more or less than average.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ ConclusionIf the manager's inside information is unfavorable, ΔN is negative and the firm will always issue, even if the only good use for the funds raised is to put them in the bank-a zero-NPV investment.
“(If the manager's inside information is unfavorable, AN is negative and the firm will always issue, even if the only good use for the funds raised is to put them in the bank-a zero-NPV investment.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The firm's manager knows x and y, while investors in capital markets do not and see only a joint distribution of possible values (x, y).
- The authors state this as an assumption: Aside from the information asymmetry, capital markets are perfect and semi-strong form efficient.
- The authors state this as an assumption: MM's Proposition I holds in the sense that the stock of debt relative to real assets is irrelevant if information available to investors is held constant.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The information asymmetry is taken as given.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ ConclusionModels based on asymmetric information can predict the two central ideas of the pecking order story: first, the preference for internal finance, and, second, the preference for debt over equity if external financing is sought.
“I have presented it just to show how models based on asymmetric information can predict the two central ideas of the pecking order story: first, the preference for internal finance, and, second, the preference for debt over equity if external financing is sought.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The firm's manager knows x and y, while investors in capital markets do not and see only a joint distribution of possible values (x, y).
- The authors state this as an assumption: Aside from the information asymmetry, capital markets are perfect and semi-strong form efficient.
- The authors state this as an assumption: MM's Proposition I holds in the sense that the stock of debt relative to real assets is irrelevant if information available to investors is held constant.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The information asymmetry is taken as given.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
Interpretationnone given§ ConclusionWe lack an objective proxy for changes in the degree of asymmetry.
“because we lack an objective proxy for changes in the degree of asymmetry.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
The authors state this as an assumption.
Managers have special information that investors do not have.
“if one starts by assuming that managers have special information, builds a model of how that information changes financing choices, and predicts which choices will be interpreted by investors as good or bad news, then some progress has been made.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The customary assumptions of option pricing models hold when default risk is introduced.
“Even if default risk is introduced, the absolute value of AN will be less for debt than for equity if we make the customary assumptions of option pricing models.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The firm's manager knows x and y, while investors in capital markets do not and see only a joint distribution of possible values (x, y).
“The firm's manager knows what x and y are, but investors in capital markets do not: they see only a joint distribution of possible values (x, y).”
The authors state this as an assumption.
Aside from the information asymmetry, capital markets are perfect and semi-strong form efficient.
“Aside from the information asymmetry, capital markets are perfect and semi-strong form efficient.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
MM's Proposition I holds in the sense that the stock of debt relative to real assets is irrelevant if information available to investors is held constant.
“MM's Proposition I holds in the sense that the stock of debt relative to real assets is irrelevant if information available to investors is held constant.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
Changes in firm value are lognormally distributed.
“This amounts to assuming that changes in firm value are lognormally distributed, that managers and investors agree on the variance rate, and that managers know the current value of x + y but investors do not.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
Managers and investors agree on the variance rate.
“This amounts to assuming that changes in firm value are lognormally distributed, that managers and investors agree on the variance rate, and that managers know the current value of x + y but investors do not.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
Managers know the current value of x + y but investors do not.
“This amounts to assuming that changes in firm value are lognormally distributed, that managers and investors agree on the variance rate, and that managers know the current value of x + y but investors do not.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
New shares or risky debt would be underpriced in the example.
“This example assumes that new shares or risky debt would be underpriced.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
If the firm always has a zero-NPV opportunity available to it, the distribution of y is truncated at y = 0.
“If the firm always has a zero-NPV opportunity available to it, the distribution of y is truncated at y = 0.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
x is non-negative.
“I also assume that x is non-negative.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The information asymmetry is taken as given.
“The information asymmetry is taken as given.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The information asymmetry applies to both the investment project and the firm without the project.
“The information asymmetry applies to both goods-for example, the manager may receive inside information that amounts to good news about x and bad news about y, or vice versa, or good or bad news about both.”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Korwar citation points to a different reference
MinorThe text cites Korwar as reference 11, but the reference list assigns Korwar number 19.
“This fact has been confirmed in several studies, including those by Korwar [11].”
“19. Korwar, A. N., "The Effect of New Issues of Equity: An Empirical Examination," Working Paper, University of California, Los Angeles, 1981.”
Jalilvand and Harris citation has the wrong number
MinorThe text cites Jalilvand and Harris as reference 16, while the reference list places their work at number 17.
“Jalilvand and Harris[16], for example.”
“17. Jalilvand, A. and R. S. Harris, "Corporate Behavior in Adjusting Capital Structure and Dividend Policy: An Econometric Study," Journal of Finance, 39 (March 1984), 127-145.”
Cites
Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure
Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976) · Journal of Financial Economics · doi:10.1016/0304-405x(76)90026-x · Cited by 71,491 · see citing works
The Market for "Lemons": Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism
Akerlof, G. A. (1970) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.2307/1879431 · Cited by 23,016 · see citing works
Corporate financing and investment decisions when firms have information that investors do not have
Myers, S. C., & Majluf, N. S. (1984) · Journal of Financial Economics · doi:10.1016/0304-405x(84)90023-0 · Cited by 18,957 · see citing works
Self-citationThe Cost of Capital, Corporation Finance and the Theory of Investment
Miller, M. H. (1958) · American Economic Review · Cited by 14,574 · see citing works
Determinants of corporate borrowing
Myers, S. C. (1977) · Journal of Financial Economics · doi:10.1016/0304-405x(77)90015-0 · Cited by 13,169 · see citing works
Self-citationThe cost of capital, corporation finance and the theory of investment
Terra, P. R. S. (2008) · BASE - Revista de Administração e Contabilidade da Unisinos · doi:10.4013/base.20082.07 · Cited by 8,825 · see citing works
The Modern Corporation and Private Property
Kline, J. V., Berle, A. A., & Means, G. C. (1933) · Columbia Law Review · doi:10.2307/1115736 · Cited by 7,496 · see citing works
Corporate Financing and Investment Decisions When Firms Have InformationThat Investors Do Not Have
Myers, S., & Majluf, N. (1984) · doi:10.3386/w1396 · Cited by 6,722 · see citing works
Self-citationDividend Policy, Growth, and the Valuation of Shares
Miller, M. H., & Modigliani, F. (1961) · The Journal of Business · doi:10.1086/294442 · Cited by 6,558 · see citing works
The Determination of Financial Structure: The Incentive‐Signalling Approach,
Ross, S. A. (1977) · The Bell Journal of Economics · doi:10.2307/3003485 · Cited by 4,168 · see citing works
Principles of Corporate Finance.
Stapleton, R. C., Brealey, R. A., & Myers, S. C. (1981) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.2307/2327568 · Cited by 3,787 · see citing works
Self-citation(1956) · Cited by 3,427 · see citing works
Miller, M. H. (1977) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.1977.tb03267.x · Cited by 2,898 · see citing works
Optimal capital structure under corporate and personal taxation
DeAngelo, H., & Masulis, R. W. (1980) · Journal of Financial Economics · doi:10.1016/0304-405x(80)90019-7 · Cited by 2,872 · see citing works
Smith, C. W., & Warner, J. B. (1979) · Journal of Financial Economics · doi:10.1016/0304-405x(79)90011-4 · Cited by 2,855 · see citing works
The Modern Corporation and Private Property
Ballantine, H. W., Berle, A. A., & Means, G. C. (1932) · California Law Review · doi:10.2307/3475545 · Cited by 1,346 · see citing works
Black, F. (1976) · The Journal of Portfolio Management · doi:10.3905/jpm.1976.408558 · Cited by 1,262 · see citing works
Common stock repurchases and market signalling
Vermaelen, T. (1981) · Journal of Financial Economics · doi:10.1016/0304-405x(81)90011-8 · Cited by 1,077 · see citing works
The Choice Between Equity and Debt: An Empirical Study
MARSH, P. (1982) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.1982.tb01099.x · Cited by 814 · see citing works
The Choice Between Equity and Debt: An Empirical Study
Marsh, P. (1982) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.2307/2327121 · Cited by 709 · see citing works
Dann, L. Y. (1981) · Journal of Financial Economics · doi:10.1016/0304-405x(81)90010-6 · Cited by 697 · see citing works
Fisher, A. J., & Donaldson, G. (1962) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.2307/2977084 · Cited by 673 · see citing works
Miller, M. H. (1977) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.2307/2326758 · Cited by 602 · see citing works
SOME ESTIMATES OF THE COST OF CAPITAL TO THE ELECTRIC UTILITY INDUSTRY, 1954-57
Miller, M. H., & Modigliani, F. (1966) · Cited by 597 · see citing works
Corporate Behavior in Adjusting to Capital Structure and Dividend Targets: An Econometric Study
Jalilvand, A., & Harris, R. S. (1984) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.1984.tb03864.x · Cited by 558 · see citing works
The effects of capital structure change on security prices
Masulis, R. W. (1980) · Journal of Financial Economics · doi:10.1016/0304-405x(80)90015-x · Cited by 529 · see citing works
A MODEL OF CORPORATE FINANCING DECISIONS
Taggart, R. A. (1977) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.1977.tb03348.x · Cited by 468 · see citing works
Convertible debt issuance, capital structure change and financing-related information
Dann, L. Y., & Mikkelson, W. H. (1984) · Journal of Financial Economics · doi:10.1016/0304-405x(84)90022-9 · Cited by 407 · see citing works
The Impact of Capital Structure Change on Firm Value: Some Estimates
Masulis, R. W. (1983) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.1983.tb03629.x · Cited by 392 · see citing works
Investment Patterns and Financial Leverage
Long, M., & Malitz, I. (1983) · doi:10.3386/w1145 · Cited by 295 · see citing works
How taxes affect economic behavior
(1981) · Journal of Macroeconomics · doi:10.1016/0164-0704(81)90095-1 · Cited by 266 · see citing works
Convertible calls and security returns
Mikkelson, W. H. (1981) · Journal of Financial Economics · doi:10.1016/0304-405x(81)90027-1 · Cited by 212 · see citing works
Debt, Dividend Policy, Taxes, Inflation and Market Valuation
Modigliani, F. (1982) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.1982.tb03549.x · Cited by 202 · see citing works
Corporate Capital Structures in the United States
Friedman, B. M. (1985) · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226264233.001.0001 · Cited by 168 · see citing works
A Global Approach to Money Management
Garrone, F., & Solnik, B. H. (1976) · The Journal of Portfolio Management · doi:10.3905/jpm.1976.408571 · Cited by 136 · see citing works
The 20th Century Capitalist Revolution
Buck, W. H., & Berle, A. A. (1955) · Virginia Law Review · doi:10.2307/1070298 · Cited by 123 · see citing works
The 20th century capitalist revolution
Berle, A. (1954) · doi:10.2307/1337712 · Cited by 118
Strategy for Financial Mobility.
Kavesh, R. A., & Donaldson, G. (1970) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.2307/2325610 · Cited by 101 · see citing works
SOME NOTES ON FINANCIAL INCENTIVE‐SIGNALLING MODELS, ACTIVITY CHOICE AND RISK PREFERENCES
Ross, S. A. (1978) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.1978.tb02018.x · Cited by 86 · see citing works
Estimating the Tax Advantage of Corporate Debt
Cordes, J. J., & Sheffrin, S. M. (1983) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.1983.tb03628.x · Cited by 75 · see citing works
The Effect of Capital Structure on the Cost of Capital.
Beranek, W., & Barges, A. (1964) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.2307/2977942 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
Some Notes on Financial Incentive-Signalling Models, Activity Choice and Risk Preferences
Ross, S. A. (1978) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.2307/2326473 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
THE EFFECT OF CAPITAL STRUCTURE ON THE COST OF CAPITAL*
Barges, A. (1962) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.1962.tb04328.x · Cited by 21
The Moral Hazard Theory of Corporate Financial Structure: Empirical Tests
Williamson, S. (2011) · DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Debt, Dividend Policy, Taxes, Inflation, and Market Valuation: Erratum
Modigliani, F. (1983) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.1983.tb02522.x · Cited by 4
Estimating the Tax Advantage of Corporate Debt
Cordes, J. J., & Sheffrin, S. M. (1983) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.2307/2327640
The Effect of Capital Structure on the Cost of Capital
Barges, A. (1962) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.2307/2977081
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Myers S., 1984, The Search for Optimal Capital Structure,, Midland Corporate Finance Journal, 1, 6
Cited by
Sorted by citations
What Do We Know about Capital Structure? Some Evidence from International Data
RAJAN, R. G., & ZINGALES, L. (1995) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.1995.tb05184.x · Cited by 6,538 · see citing works
The theory and practice of corporate finance: evidence from the field
Graham, J. R., & Harvey, C. R. (2001) · Journal of Financial Economics · doi:10.1016/s0304-405x(01)00044-7 · Cited by 5,951 · see citing works
Outside directors and CEO turnover
Weisbach, M. S. (1988) · Journal of Financial Economics · doi:10.1016/0304-405x(88)90053-0 · Cited by 4,436 · see citing works
The Theory of Capital Structure
Harris, M., & Raviv, A. (1991) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.1991.tb03753.x · Cited by 4,371 · see citing works
CEO Overconfidence and Corporate Investment
Malmendier, U. M., & Tate, G. A. (2005) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.2005.00813.x · Cited by 3,645 · see citing works
Introductory Econometrics for Finance
Brooks, C. (2008) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108524872 · Cited by 3,705 · see citing works
Market Timing and Capital Structure
Baker, M. P., & Wurgler, J. A. (2002) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/1540-6261.00414 · Cited by 3,732 · see citing works
Testing Trade-Off and Pecking Order Predictions About Dividends and Debt
Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. (2002) · Review of Financial Studies · doi:10.1093/rfs/15.1.1 · Cited by 3,397 · see citing works
The Influence of Institutional Investors on Myopic R&D Investment BehaviorPreprint
Bushee, B. J. (1998) · SSRN Electronic Journal · Cited by 3,198 · see citing works
Disappearing dividends: changing firm characteristics or lower propensity to pay?
Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. (2001) · Journal of Financial Economics · doi:10.1016/s0304-405x(01)00038-1 · Cited by 3,040 · see citing works
Hanlon, M., & Heitzman, S. M. (2010) · Journal of Accounting and Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jacceco.2010.09.002 · Cited by 3,172 · see citing works
Corporate Debt Value, Bond Covenants, and Optimal Capital Structure
Leland, H. E. (1994) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.1994.tb02452.x · Cited by 2,732 · see citing works
International Journal of Business and Management
(2017) · International Journal of Business and Management · doi:10.26666/rmp.ijbm · Cited by 2,891 · see citing works
Capital structure decisions: Which factors are reliably important?
Frank, M. Z., & Goyal, V. K. (2009) · Financial Management · doi:10.1111/j.1755-053x.2009.01026.x · Cited by 2,859 · see citing works
Testing the Pecking Order Theory of Capital Structure
Frank, M. Z., & Goyal, V. K. (2003) · Journal of Financial Economics · doi:10.1016/s0304-405x(02)00252-0 · Cited by 2,838 · see citing works
The financial accelerator, and the flight to quality
Bernanke, B., Gertler, M., & Gilchrist, S. (1996) · The Review of Economics and Statistics · doi:10.2307/2109844 · Cited by 2,351 · see citing works
Dasar-Dasar Manajemen KeuanganPreprint
Agusfianto, N. P., Herawati, N., Fariantin, E., et al. (2022) · doi:10.31237/osf.io/gxmz4 · Cited by 2,101 · see citing works
Partial adjustment toward target capital structures
Flannery, M. J., & Rangan, K. P. (2005) · Journal of Financial Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jfineco.2005.03.004 · Cited by 1,989 · see citing works
Exploration and exploitation alliances in biotechnology: a system of new product development
Rothaermel, F. T., & DEEDS, D. L. (2004) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.376 · Cited by 1,921 · see citing works
Berger, A. N., & Udell, G. F. (2002) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.1111/1468-0297.00682 · Cited by 1,848 · see citing works
Back to the Beginning: Persistence and the Cross‐Section of Corporate Capital Structure
Lemmon, M. L., Roberts, M. R., & Zender, J. F. (2008) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.2008.01369.x · Cited by 1,768 · see citing works
Shyam-Sunder, L., & Myers, S. C. (1999) · Journal of Financial Economics · doi:10.1016/s0304-405x(98)00051-8 · Cited by 1,756 · see citing works
Self-citationThe Theory and Practice of Corporate Finance: Evidence from the FieldPreprint
Graham, J. R., & Harvey, C. R. (2000) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.220251 · Cited by 1,657 · see citing works
Dynamic Capital Structure Choice: Theory and Tests
Fischer, E. O., Heinkel, R. L., & Zechner, J. (1989) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.1989.tb02402.x · Cited by 1,589 · see citing works
Banks as Liquidity Providers: An Explanation for the Coexistence of Lending and Deposit‐taking
Kashyap, A., Rajan, R. G., & Stein, J. C. (2002) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/1540-6261.00415 · Cited by 1,449 · see citing works
Cash Flow Patterns as a Proxy for Firm Life Cycle
Dickinson, V. (2011) · The Accounting Review · doi:10.2308/accr-10130 · Cited by 1,515 · see citing works
The Relationship between Firm Investment and Financial Status
Cleary, S. (1999) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/0022-1082.00121 · Cited by 1,399 · see citing works
Do Firms Rebalance Their Capital Structures?
Leary, M. T., & Roberts, M. R. (2005) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.2005.00811.x · Cited by 1,495 · see citing works
A Catering Theory of Dividends
Baker, M. P., & Wurgler, J. (2004) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.2004.00658.x · Cited by 377 · see citing works
Valuation effects of security offerings and the issuance process
Mikkelson, W. H., & Partch, M. M. (1986) · Journal of Financial Economics · doi:10.1016/0304-405x(86)90049-8 · Cited by 1,213 · see citing works
Do Taxes Affect Corporate Financing Decisions?
MacKie–Mason, J. K. (1990) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.1990.tb03724.x · Cited by 1,158 · see citing works
Testing Static Trade-off Against Pecking Order Models of Capital Structure
Shyam-Sunder, L., & Myers, S. (1994) · doi:10.3386/w4722 · Cited by 1,165 · see citing works
Self-citationTesting Tradeoff and Pecking Order Predictions About Dividends and DebtPreprint
Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. (1999) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.199431 · Cited by 1,140 · see citing works
Accounting Quality and Firm-Level Capital Investment
Biddle, G. C., & Hilary, G. (2006) · The Accounting Review · doi:10.2308/accr.2006.81.5.963 · Cited by 1,113 · see citing works
Do Peer Firms Affect Corporate Financial Policy?
Leary, M. T., & Roberts, M. R. (2013) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/jofi.12094 · Cited by 1,167 · see citing works
Oligopoly and financial structure: the limited liability effect
Brander, J. A., & Lewis, T. R. (1989) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511528231.025 · Cited by 1,084 · see citing works
Corporate cash holdings: An empirical investigation of UK companies
Ozkan, A., & Ozkan, N. (2003) · Journal of Banking & Finance · doi:10.1016/j.jbankfin.2003.08.003 · Cited by 1,178 · see citing works
The Operating Performance of Firms Conducting Seasoned Equity Offerings
Loughran, T., & Ritter, J. R. (1997) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.1997.tb02743.x · Cited by 1,090 · see citing works
Simultaneous Determination of Insider Ownership, Debt, and Dividend Policies
Jensen, G. R., Solberg, D. P., & Zorn, T. S. (1992) · Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis · doi:10.2307/2331370 · Cited by 1,064 · see citing works
Stock Valuation and Learning about Profitability
Pástor, Ľ., & Veronesi, P. (2003) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/1540-6261.00587 · Cited by 1,003 · see citing works
Management turnover and financial distress
Gilson, S. C. (1989) · Journal of Financial Economics · doi:10.1016/0304-405x(89)90083-4 · Cited by 1,045 · see citing works
Denis, D. J., & Mihov, V. T. (2003) · Journal of Financial Economics · doi:10.1016/s0304-405x(03)00140-5 · Cited by 977 · see citing works
An Empirical Test of the Impact of Managerial Self-Interest on Corporate Capital Structure
Friend, I., & Lang, L. H. P. (1988) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.1988.tb03938.x · Cited by 1,083 · see citing works
Investment banking and the capital acquisition process
Smith, C. W. (1986) · Journal of Financial Economics · doi:10.1016/0304-405x(86)90048-6 · Cited by 979 · see citing works
Timing, investment opportunities, managerial discretion, and the security issue decision
Jung, K., Kim, Y.-C., & Stulz, R. M. (1996) · Journal of Financial Economics · doi:10.1016/0304-405x(96)00881-1 · Cited by 926 · see citing works
Dynamic Investment Models and the Firm's Financial Policy
Bond, S., & Meghir, C. (1994) · The Review of Economic Studies · doi:10.2307/2297978 · Cited by 979 · see citing works
Taxes, Financing Decisions, and Firm Value
Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. (1998) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/0022-1082.00036 · Cited by 1,037 · see citing works
The effect of capital structure on profitability: an empirical analysis of listed firms in Ghana
Abor, J. (2005) · The Journal of Risk Finance · doi:10.1108/15265940510633505 · Cited by 962 · see citing works
Equity ownership and the two faces of debt
McConnell, J. J., & Servaes, H. (1995) · Journal of Financial Economics · doi:10.1016/0304-405x(95)00824-x · Cited by 959 · see citing works
CEO Overconfidence and Corporate InvestmentPreprint
Malmendier, U. M., & Tate, G. A. (2002) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.354387 · Cited by 955 · see citing works
The Determinants of Capital Structure: Capital Market-Oriented versus Bank-Oriented Institutions
Antoniou, A., Gűney, Y., & Paudyal, K. (2008) · Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis · doi:10.1017/s0022109000002751 · Cited by 900 · see citing works
Presidential Address: Asset Price Dynamics with Slow‐Moving Capital
Duffie, D. (2010) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.2010.01569.x · Cited by 917 · see citing works
Financing decisions: who issues stock?
Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. (2004) · Journal of Financial Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jfineco.2004.10.003 · Cited by 923 · see citing works
Empirical tax research in accounting
Shackelford, D. A., & Shevlin, T. J. (2001) · Journal of Accounting and Economics · doi:10.1016/s0165-4101(01)00022-2 · Cited by 956 · see citing works
How Big are the Tax Benefits of Debt?Preprint
Graham, J. R. (1998) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.92559 · Cited by 805 · see citing works
Capital structure, equity ownership and firm performance
Margaritis, D., & Psillaki, M. (2009) · Journal of Banking & Finance · doi:10.1016/j.jbankfin.2009.08.023 · Cited by 871 · see citing works
Minton, B. A., & Schrand, C. M. (1999) · Journal of Financial Economics · doi:10.1016/s0304-405x(99)00042-2 · Cited by 904 · see citing works
Testing Theories of Capital Structure and Estimating the Speed of Adjustment
Huang, R., & Ritter, J. R. (2009) · Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis · doi:10.1017/s0022109009090152 · Cited by 901 · see citing works
Credit Ratings and Capital Structure
Kisgen, D. J. (2006) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.2006.00866.x · Cited by 846 · see citing works
Firms’ histories and their capital structures☆
Kayhan, A., & Titman, S. D. (2006) · Journal of Financial Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jfineco.2005.10.007 · Cited by 796 · see citing works
Initial Public Offerings: An Analysis of Theory and Practice
Brau, J. C., & Fawcett, S. E. (2006) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.2006.00840.x · Cited by 817 · see citing works
Financing Policy, Basis Risk, and Corporate Hedging: Evidence from Oil and Gas Producers
Haushalter, D. (2000) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/0022-1082.00202 · Cited by 745 · see citing works
Corporate Social Responsibility and Investment Efficiency
Benlemlih, M., & Bitar, M. (2015) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-016-3020-2 · Cited by 770 · see citing works
Taxes and Corporate Finance: A Review
Graham, J. R. (2003) · Review of Financial Studies · doi:10.1093/rfs/hhg033 · Cited by 786 · see citing works
International Evidence on Cash Holdings and Expected Managerial Agency Problems
Kalcheva, I., & Lins, K. V. (2006) · Review of Financial Studies · doi:10.1093/rfs/hhm023 · Cited by 820 · see citing works
Michaelas, N., Chittenden, F., & Poutziouris, P. Z. (1999) · Small Business Economics · doi:10.1023/a:1008010724051 · Cited by 741 · see citing works
Chittenden, F., Hall, G. C., & Hutchinson, P. J. (1996) · Small Business Economics · doi:10.1007/bf00391976 · Cited by 720 · see citing works
Do Asset Fire Sales Exist? An Empirical Investigation of Commercial Aircraft Transactions
Pulvino, T. C. (1998) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/0022-1082.00040 · Cited by 682 · see citing works
Does Asymmetric Information Drive Capital Structure Decisions?
Bharath, S. T., Pasquariello, P., & Wu, G. (2008) · Review of Financial Studies · doi:10.1093/rfs/hhn076 · Cited by 722 · see citing works
Proxies for the corporate marginal tax rate
Graham, J. R. (1996) · Journal of Financial Economics · doi:10.1016/0304-405x(96)00879-3 · Cited by 706 · see citing works
Share Issuance and Cross‐sectional Returns
Pontiff, J., & Woodgate, A. (2008) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.2008.01335.x · Cited by 639 · see citing works
Stulz, R. M., & Johnson, H. (1985) · Journal of Financial Economics · doi:10.1016/0304-405x(85)90024-8 · Cited by 675 · see citing works
Debt and the marginal tax rate
Graham, J. R. (n.d.) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · Cited by 680 · see citing works
Zhang, S., Wu, Z., Wang, Y., & Hao, Y. (2021) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113159 · Cited by 659 · see citing works
Capital structure decision making
Romano, C. A., Tanewski, G., & Smyrnios, K. X. (2001) · Journal of Business Venturing · doi:10.1016/s0883-9026(99)00053-1 · Cited by 650 · see citing works
Control Rights and Capital Structure: An Empirical Investigation
Roberts, M. R., & Sufi, A. (2009) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.2009.01476.x · Cited by 650 · see citing works
Accounting conservatism and firm investment efficiency
Lara, J. M. G., Osma, B. G., & Peñalva, F. (2015) · Journal of Accounting and Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jacceco.2015.07.003 · Cited by 658 · see citing works
The Method of Payment in Corporate Acquisitions, Investment Opportunities, and Management Ownership
Martin, K. J. (1996) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.1996.tb04068.x · Cited by 654 · see citing works
Why Do Firms Hold Cash? Evidence from EMU Countries
Ferreira, M. A., & Vilela, A. S. (2004) · European Financial Management · doi:10.1111/j.1354-7798.2004.00251.x · Cited by 856 · see citing works
Determinants of capital structure: new evidence from Spanish panel data
Miguel, A., & Pindado, J. (2001) · Journal of Corporate Finance · doi:10.1016/s0929-1199(00)00020-1 · Cited by 634 · see citing works
Kim, P. H., Aldrich, H. E., & Keister, L. A. (2006) · Small Business Economics · doi:10.1007/s11187-006-0007-x · Cited by 630 · see citing works
Debt Capacity and Tests of Capital Structure Theories
Lemmon, M. L., & Zender, J. F. (2010) · Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis · doi:10.1017/s0022109010000499 · Cited by 614 · see citing works
What drives corporate liquidity? An international survey of cash holdings and lines of credit☆
Lins, K. V., Servaes, H., & Tufano, P. (2010) · Journal of Financial Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jfineco.2010.04.006 · Cited by 627 · see citing works
Institutional determinants of capital structure adjustment speeds
Öztekin, Ö., & Flannery, M. J. (2011) · Journal of Financial Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jfineco.2011.08.014 · Cited by 620 · see citing works
Debt, Leases, Taxes, and the Endogeneity of Corporate Tax Status
Graham, J. R., Lemmon, M. L., & Schallheim, J. S. (1998) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/0022-1082.55404 · Cited by 608 · see citing works
He, L., Liu, R., Zhong, Z., Wang, D., & Xia, Y. (2019) · Renewable Energy · doi:10.1016/j.renene.2019.05.059 · Cited by 587 · see citing works
Debt Maturity and the Effects of Growth Opportunities and Liquidity Risk on Leverage
Johnson, S. A. (2003) · Review of Financial Studies · doi:10.1093/rfs/16.1.0209 · Cited by 548 · see citing works
Heider, F., & Ljungqvist, A. P. (2012) · Journal of Financial Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jfineco.2015.01.004 · Cited by 540 · see citing works
The pecking order, debt capacity, and information asymmetry
Leary, M. T., & Roberts, M. R. (2009) · Journal of Financial Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jfineco.2009.10.009 · Cited by 601 · see citing works
The impact of capital‐structure choice on firm performance: empirical evidence from Egypt
Ebaid, I. E. (2009) · The Journal of Risk Finance · doi:10.1108/15265940911001385 · Cited by 568 · see citing works
The mystery of zero-leverage firms
Strebulaev, I. A., & Yang, B. (2013) · Journal of Financial Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jfineco.2013.02.001 · Cited by 564 · see citing works
The determinants of corporate leverage and dividend policies
Barclay, M. J., Smith, C. W., & Watts, R. L. (1995) · Journal of applied corporate finance · doi:10.1111/j.1745-6622.1995.tb00259.x · Cited by 555 · see citing works
How Do Large Banking Organizations Manage Their Capital Ratios?
Berger, A. N., DeYoung, R. E., Flannery, M. J., Lee, D. K., & Öztekin, Ö. (2008) · Journal of Financial Services Research · doi:10.1007/s10693-008-0044-5 · Cited by 508 · see citing works
Determinants of the Capital Structures of European SMEs
Hall, G. C., Hutchinson, P. J., & Michaelas, N. (2004) · Journal of Business Finance & Accounting · doi:10.1111/j.0306-686x.2004.00554.x · Cited by 545 · see citing works
Back to the Beginning: Persistence and the Cross-Section of Corporate Capital StructurePreprint
Lemmon, M. L., Roberts, M. R., & Zender, J. F. (2006) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.881899 · Cited by 544 · see citing works
Valuation effects of corporate debt offerings
Eckbo, B. E. (1986) · Journal of Financial Economics · doi:10.1016/0304-405x(86)90052-8 · Cited by 496 · see citing works
A Test of the Agency Theory of Managerial Ownership, Corporate Leverage, and Corporate Dividends
Crutchley, C. E., & Hansen, R. S. (1989) · Financial Management · doi:10.2307/3665795 · Cited by 524 · see citing works
Reuer, J. J., & Koza, M. P. (2000) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/(sici)1097-0266(200001)21:1 · Cited by 271 · see citing works
Commercial banks in investment banking conflict of interest or certification role?
Puri, M. (1996) · Journal of Financial Economics · doi:10.1016/0304-405x(95)00855-9 · Cited by 486 · see citing works
Why Do Firms Hold Cash? Evidence from Emu CountriesPreprint
Ferreira, M. A. M. M., & Vilela, A. (2004) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.614002 · Cited by 500 · see citing works
- Authors
- MYERS, S. C.
- Affiliations
- National Bureau of Economic Research (US)
- Corresponding author
- MYERS, STEWART C.
- Venue
- The Journal of Finance
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1984-07
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 574-592
- ISSN
- 0022-1082 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-6261
- OpenAlex
- W2170790204
- Cited by
- 7,526
- References
- 43
- Citations by year
- 2026: 117 · 2025: 159 · 2024: 234 · 2023: 324 · 2022: 285 · 2021: 381 · 2020: 413 · 2019: 391 · 2018: 381 · 2017: 342 · 2016: 391 · 2015: 439 · 2014: 394 · 2013: 378 · 2012: 376
- FWCI
- 102.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- The Journal of Finance (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Accounting › Corporate Finance and Governance
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Accounting › Financial Analysis and Corporate Governance
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Financial Reporting and Valuation Research
- Keywords
- capital structure puzzle, managerial capitalism, separation of ownership and control, agency theory, corporate financing decisions, investment decision-making, Modigliani-Miller theorem
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-11.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-11.
Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review