Cited by 27Urban Stormwater Management SolutionsHydrology and Watershed Management StudiesUrban Heat Island Mitigation

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Performance analysis of a stormwater green infrastructure model for flow and water quality predictions

Fowdar, Harsha S, Neo, Teck Heng, Ong, Say Leong, Hu, Jiangyong, McCarthy, David T.·2022·Journal of Environmental Management

Abstract

Nature-based solutions or Green infrastructure (GI) used for managing stormwater pollution are growing in popularity across the globe. Stormwater GI models are important tools to inform the planning of these systems (type, design, size), in the most efficient and cost-effective manner. MUSIC, an example of such a tool, uses regression and first order decay models. Studies validating MUSIC model performance are, however, scarce, hindering future model development and transferability of the model for systems operating under different design and climatic conditions. To close this gap, this paper evaluates MUSIC for a field scale bioretention system, stormwater wetland and vegetated swale operating under Singapore tropical climate. The treatment modules were able to simulate outflows and effluent pollutant concentrations reasonably well for cumulative event volumes (mostly within ±25%) and cumulative TP and TN loads (within ±30%). Outflow TSS loads were significantly under-estimated as a result of greater variability in measured TSS concentrations across events. The findings indicate that simple empirical models such as MUSIC can be transferred to different regions provided that management decisions are based on long-term modelling efforts. The modules generally simulated the outflow hydrographs and pollutographs of the different inflow and drying/wetting conditions relatively poorly.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115259

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 31

  1. Ahiablame, 2012, Representation and evaluation of low impact development practices with L-THIA-LID: an example for site planning, Environ. Pollut., 1, 1, 10.5539/ep.v1n2p1 · DOI
  2. Alikhani, 2020, Modeling and design scenario analysis of long-term monitored bioretention system for rainfall-runoff reduction to combined sewer in Cincinnati, OH, Journal of sustainable water in the built environment, 6, 4019016, 10.1061/JSWBAY.0000903 · DOI
  3. Bertrand-Krajewski, 2003, Accounting for sensor calibration, data validation, measurement and sampling uncertainties in monitoring urban drainage systems, Water Sci. Technol., 47, 95, 10.2166/wst.2003.0094 · DOI
  4. Bratieres, 2008, Nutrient and sediment removal by stormwater biofilters: a large-scale design optimisation study, Water Res., 42, 3930, 10.1016/j.watres.2008.06.009 · DOI
  5. Brown, 2013, Calibration and validation of DRAINMOD to model bioretention hydrology, J. Hydrol., 486, 430, 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.02.017 · DOI
  6. Chandrasena, 2016, Biofiltration for stormwater harvesting: Comparison of Campylobacter spp. and Escherichia coli removal under normal and challenging operational conditions, J. Hydrol., 537, 248, 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.03.044 · DOI
  7. Charlesworth, 2010, A review of the adaptation and mitigation of global climate change using sustainable drainage in cities, J. Water Clim. Change, 1, 165, 10.2166/wcc.2010.035 · DOI
  8. Dotto, 2011, Performance and sensitivity analysis of stormwater models using a Bayesian approach and long-term high resolution data, Environ. Model. Software, 26, 1225, 10.1016/j.envsoft.2011.03.013 · DOI
  9. Eckart, 2017, vol. 607, 413
  10. Elliott, 2007, A review of models for low impact urban stormwater drainage, Environ. Model. Software, 22, 394, 10.1016/j.envsoft.2005.12.005 · DOI
  11. Fletcher, 2013, Understanding, management and modelling of urban hydrology and its consequences for receiving waters: a state of the art, Adv. Water Resour., 51, 261, 10.1016/j.advwatres.2012.09.001 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Fletcher, 2015, SUDS, LID, BMPs, WSUD and more–The evolution and application of terminology surrounding urban drainage, Urban Water J., 12, 525, 10.1080/1573062X.2014.916314 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Gilliom, 2020, Adequacy of linear models for estimating stormwater best management practice treatment performance, J. Sustain. Water Built Environ., 6, 4020016, 10.1061/JSWBAY.0000921 · DOI
  14. Hatt, 2009, Hydrologic and pollutant removal performance of stormwater biofiltration systems at the field scale, J. Hydrol., 365, 310, 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2008.12.001 · DOI
  15. Imteaz, 2013, Modelling stormwater treatment systems using MUSIC: Accuracy, Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 71, 15, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2012.11.007 · DOI
  16. Le Coustumer, 2009, Hydraulic performance of biofilter systems for stormwater management: influences of design and operation, J. Hydrol., 376, 16, 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.07.012 · DOI
  17. Lee, 2012, vol. 37, 6
  18. Massoudieh, 2017, vol. 92, 57
  19. McCarthy, 2011, Development and testing of a model for micro-organism prediction in urban stormwater (MOPUS), J. Hydrol., 409, 236, 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.08.023 · DOI
  20. McCarthy, 2008, Uncertainties in stormwater E. coli levels, Water Res., 42, 1812, 10.1016/j.watres.2007.11.009 · DOI
  21. Moriasi, 2007, Model evaluation guidelines for systematic quantification of accuracy in watershed simulations, Transact. ASABE, 50, 885, 10.13031/2013.23153 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Neo, 2022, Evaluation of active, beautiful, clean waters design features in tropical urban cities: a case study in Singapore, Water, 14, 468, 10.3390/w14030468 · DOI
  23. Obropta, 2007, Review of urban stormwater quality models: deterministic, stochastic, and hybrid approaches 1, JAWRA J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc., 43, 1508, 10.1111/j.1752-1688.2007.00124.x · DOI
  24. Park, 2011, Performance modeling of storm water best management practices with uncertainty analysis, J. Hydrol. Eng., 16, 332, 10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000323 · DOI
  25. Randelovic, 2016, Stormwater biofilter treatment model (MPiRe) for selected micro-pollutants, Water Res., 89, 180, 10.1016/j.watres.2015.11.046 · DOI
  26. Salvadore, 2015, Hydrological modelling of urbanized catchments: a review and future directions, J. Hydrol., 529, 62, 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.06.028 · DOI
  27. Shen, 2018, Stormwater biofilter treatment model for faecal microorganisms, Sci. Total Environ., 630, 992, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.02.193 · DOI
  28. Walsh, 2005, The urban stream syndrome: current knowledge and the search for a cure, J. North Am. Benthol. Soc., 24, 706, 10.1899/04-028.1 · DOI · Paper page
  29. Wong, 2006, Modelling urban stormwater treatment—a unified approach, Ecol. Eng., 27, 58, 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2005.10.014 · DOI
  30. Zhang, 2014, The validation of stormwater biofilters for micropollutant removal using in situ challenge tests, Ecol. Eng., 67, 1, 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2014.03.004 · DOI · Paper page
  31. Zoppou, 2001, Review of urban storm water models, Environ. Model. Software, 16, 195, 10.1016/S1364-8152(00)00084-0 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Fowdar, H. S., Neo, T. H., Ong, S. L., Hu, J., & McCarthy, D. T.
Affiliations
  • Monash University (AU)
  • National University of Singapore (SG)
Corresponding author
Fowdar, Harsha S
Venue
Journal of Environmental Management
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-08
Volume
316
Pages
115259
ISSN
0301-4797 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4281383378
Cited by
27
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 1
FWCI
1.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Environmental Management (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Public Utilities Board - Singapore
  • Singapore's National Water Agency (R-347-000-267-490)
  • Tropical Marine Science Institute, National University of Singapore
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Urban Stormwater Management Solutions
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Urban Heat Island Mitigation
Keywords
MUSIC model, bioretention, stormwater wetlands, vegetated swales, nature-based solutions, water quality prediction, first-order decay model, total phosphorus, total nitrogen, total suspended solids, model transferability, tropical climate, Singapore, model validation
MeSH terms
Rain, Singapore, Water Movements, Water Quality

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review