The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Performance analysis of a stormwater green infrastructure model for flow and water quality predictions
Abstract
Nature-based solutions or Green infrastructure (GI) used for managing stormwater pollution are growing in popularity across the globe. Stormwater GI models are important tools to inform the planning of these systems (type, design, size), in the most efficient and cost-effective manner. MUSIC, an example of such a tool, uses regression and first order decay models. Studies validating MUSIC model performance are, however, scarce, hindering future model development and transferability of the model for systems operating under different design and climatic conditions. To close this gap, this paper evaluates MUSIC for a field scale bioretention system, stormwater wetland and vegetated swale operating under Singapore tropical climate. The treatment modules were able to simulate outflows and effluent pollutant concentrations reasonably well for cumulative event volumes (mostly within ±25%) and cumulative TP and TN loads (within ±30%). Outflow TSS loads were significantly under-estimated as a result of greater variability in measured TSS concentrations across events. The findings indicate that simple empirical models such as MUSIC can be transferred to different regions provided that management decisions are based on long-term modelling efforts. The modules generally simulated the outflow hydrographs and pollutographs of the different inflow and drying/wetting conditions relatively poorly.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
GSI has been installed to improve the quantity and quality of urban runoff.
“To mitigate the impact of stormwater on downstream water bodies, GSI has been installed to improve the quantity and quality of urban runoff (Fowdar et al., 2022; McFarland et al., 2019).”
From Review of emerging contaminants in green stormwater infrastructure: antibiotic resistance genes, microplastics, tire wear particles, PFAS, and temperature (2024) · cites this paper as Fowdar et al., 2022
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 31
- Ahiablame, 2012, Representation and evaluation of low impact development practices with L-THIA-LID: an example for site planning, Environ. Pollut., 1, 1, 10.5539/ep.v1n2p1 · DOI
- Alikhani, 2020, Modeling and design scenario analysis of long-term monitored bioretention system for rainfall-runoff reduction to combined sewer in Cincinnati, OH, Journal of sustainable water in the built environment, 6, 4019016, 10.1061/JSWBAY.0000903 · DOI
- Bertrand-Krajewski, 2003, Accounting for sensor calibration, data validation, measurement and sampling uncertainties in monitoring urban drainage systems, Water Sci. Technol., 47, 95, 10.2166/wst.2003.0094 · DOI
- Bratieres, 2008, Nutrient and sediment removal by stormwater biofilters: a large-scale design optimisation study, Water Res., 42, 3930, 10.1016/j.watres.2008.06.009 · DOI
- Brown, 2013, Calibration and validation of DRAINMOD to model bioretention hydrology, J. Hydrol., 486, 430, 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.02.017 · DOI
- Chandrasena, 2016, Biofiltration for stormwater harvesting: Comparison of Campylobacter spp. and Escherichia coli removal under normal and challenging operational conditions, J. Hydrol., 537, 248, 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.03.044 · DOI
- Charlesworth, 2010, A review of the adaptation and mitigation of global climate change using sustainable drainage in cities, J. Water Clim. Change, 1, 165, 10.2166/wcc.2010.035 · DOI
- Dotto, 2011, Performance and sensitivity analysis of stormwater models using a Bayesian approach and long-term high resolution data, Environ. Model. Software, 26, 1225, 10.1016/j.envsoft.2011.03.013 · DOI
- Eckart, 2017, vol. 607, 413
- Elliott, 2007, A review of models for low impact urban stormwater drainage, Environ. Model. Software, 22, 394, 10.1016/j.envsoft.2005.12.005 · DOI
- Fletcher, 2013, Understanding, management and modelling of urban hydrology and its consequences for receiving waters: a state of the art, Adv. Water Resour., 51, 261, 10.1016/j.advwatres.2012.09.001 · DOI · Paper page
- Fletcher, 2015, SUDS, LID, BMPs, WSUD and more–The evolution and application of terminology surrounding urban drainage, Urban Water J., 12, 525, 10.1080/1573062X.2014.916314 · DOI · Paper page
- Gilliom, 2020, Adequacy of linear models for estimating stormwater best management practice treatment performance, J. Sustain. Water Built Environ., 6, 4020016, 10.1061/JSWBAY.0000921 · DOI
- Hatt, 2009, Hydrologic and pollutant removal performance of stormwater biofiltration systems at the field scale, J. Hydrol., 365, 310, 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2008.12.001 · DOI
- Imteaz, 2013, Modelling stormwater treatment systems using MUSIC: Accuracy, Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 71, 15, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2012.11.007 · DOI
- Le Coustumer, 2009, Hydraulic performance of biofilter systems for stormwater management: influences of design and operation, J. Hydrol., 376, 16, 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.07.012 · DOI
- Lee, 2012, vol. 37, 6
- Massoudieh, 2017, vol. 92, 57
- McCarthy, 2011, Development and testing of a model for micro-organism prediction in urban stormwater (MOPUS), J. Hydrol., 409, 236, 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.08.023 · DOI
- McCarthy, 2008, Uncertainties in stormwater E. coli levels, Water Res., 42, 1812, 10.1016/j.watres.2007.11.009 · DOI
- Moriasi, 2007, Model evaluation guidelines for systematic quantification of accuracy in watershed simulations, Transact. ASABE, 50, 885, 10.13031/2013.23153 · DOI · Paper page
- Neo, 2022, Evaluation of active, beautiful, clean waters design features in tropical urban cities: a case study in Singapore, Water, 14, 468, 10.3390/w14030468 · DOI
- Obropta, 2007, Review of urban stormwater quality models: deterministic, stochastic, and hybrid approaches 1, JAWRA J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc., 43, 1508, 10.1111/j.1752-1688.2007.00124.x · DOI
- Park, 2011, Performance modeling of storm water best management practices with uncertainty analysis, J. Hydrol. Eng., 16, 332, 10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000323 · DOI
- Randelovic, 2016, Stormwater biofilter treatment model (MPiRe) for selected micro-pollutants, Water Res., 89, 180, 10.1016/j.watres.2015.11.046 · DOI
- Salvadore, 2015, Hydrological modelling of urbanized catchments: a review and future directions, J. Hydrol., 529, 62, 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.06.028 · DOI
- Shen, 2018, Stormwater biofilter treatment model for faecal microorganisms, Sci. Total Environ., 630, 992, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.02.193 · DOI
- Walsh, 2005, The urban stream syndrome: current knowledge and the search for a cure, J. North Am. Benthol. Soc., 24, 706, 10.1899/04-028.1 · DOI · Paper page
- Wong, 2006, Modelling urban stormwater treatment—a unified approach, Ecol. Eng., 27, 58, 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2005.10.014 · DOI
- Zhang, 2014, The validation of stormwater biofilters for micropollutant removal using in situ challenge tests, Ecol. Eng., 67, 1, 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2014.03.004 · DOI · Paper page
- Zoppou, 2001, Review of urban storm water models, Environ. Model. Software, 16, 195, 10.1016/S1364-8152(00)00084-0 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Bodus, B., O'Malley, K., Dieter, G., Gunawardana, C., & McDonald, W. (2024) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.167195 · Cited by 76
Metadata
- Authors
- Fowdar, H. S., Neo, T. H., Ong, S. L., Hu, J., & McCarthy, D. T.
- Affiliations
- Monash University (AU)
- National University of Singapore (SG)
- Corresponding author
- Fowdar, Harsha S
- Venue
- Journal of Environmental Management
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2022-08
- Volume
- 316
- Pages
- 115259
- ISSN
- 0301-4797 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4281383378
- Cited by
- 27
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 1
- FWCI
- 1.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Environmental Management (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Public Utilities Board - Singapore
- Singapore's National Water Agency (R-347-000-267-490)
- Tropical Marine Science Institute, National University of Singapore
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Urban Stormwater Management Solutions
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Urban Heat Island Mitigation
- Keywords
- MUSIC model, bioretention, stormwater wetlands, vegetated swales, nature-based solutions, water quality prediction, first-order decay model, total phosphorus, total nitrogen, total suspended solids, model transferability, tropical climate, Singapore, model validation
- MeSH terms
- Rain, Singapore, Water Movements, Water Quality
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review